Fudo PAM vs Sectona Privileged Access Management comparison

Fudo Security and Sectona are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #21, while Sectona is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. Fudo Security holds a 2.8% mindshare in PAM, compared to Sectona’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sectona users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

1,080 Views
1,069 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Read 4 Sectona Privileged Access Management reviews

529 Views
529 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Fudo PAM and Sectona Privileged Access Management are competitors in the privileged access management category. Users lean towards Fudo PAM for its competitive pricing and effective support, while Sectona stands out with its broad feature set that justifies the investment.

Features: Fudo PAM is noted for its intuitive workflow, comprehensive session monitoring, and user-friendly interface. Sectona is known for granular policy controls, detailed auditing capabilities, and a high degree of customizability for users seeking specific policy configurations.

Room for Improvement: Fudo PAM could enhance its scalability options, integration capabilities with third-party services, and expand its feature set. Sectona users suggest improvements in user-friendly reporting tools, better integration processes, and streamlined setup procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fudo PAM offers a straightforward deployment experience and strong customer support. Sectona also delivers a relatively seamless deployment process, with customers noting that its support is thorough yet occasionally slow in responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Fudo PAM is praised for affordability and solid ROI, making it appealing to budget-conscious users. Sectona, despite higher initial costs, is seen as offering significant long-term value and ROI when utilizing its wide range of features to meet varied organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sectona Privileged Access Management is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sectona Privileged Access Management	0.9%
Fudo PAM	2.8%
Other	96.3%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Taras Dubrova

BDM at Oberig-it

Works with SCTP, STTPS, SQL, and MySQL protocols

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from different countries, including Ukraine, Kaloxetine, Uzbekistan, and others. We closed projects in different areas with customers of different sizes. When we talk about enterprise customers, we should consider that they have different use cases and desires for Fudo PAM. We compared our options for customers to choose their vendors, and we discovered Fudo PAM has few scaling options. In Fudo PAM, there should be additional features for scaling and organizing remote sessions for remote systems in remote networks.

Read full review

Pankaj-Mishra

Senior IT Security Engineer at Mahindra Group

Effective risk management, feature of recording all privileged user activities in a compressed format but limited SaaS capability

There are some areas where the GUI could be improved to make it easier to find and update privileged settings and policies. For example, when creating a PAM policy for Privileged, some of the scroll boxes are difficult to navigate. It would be easier if there were one-click options for checking and unchecking boxes rather than having to scroll down and select individual items. This would make the GUI more user-friendly for administrators and SOC teams. So, I would like to see the GUI made more user-friendly, especially for administrators and SOC teams. In future releases, I would like to be able to manage Sectona PAM by location. For example, I'm the global headquarters lead in India, and we have 200 locations around the world. I would like to be able to create sub-locations, so that when I click on support for a location, the configuration is separate. However, the monitoring should still be at the parent level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"The most valuable feature is the risk management. When a Privileged user performs a certain command, such as running a script, the system highlights it in the risk management section as high, critical, or medium risk."

"The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session recording feature is particularly noteworthy because it utilizes minimal storage. Instead of recording entire sessions, it captures activity only when necessary, optimizing storage space."

"A key factor for my company is support, and Sectona Privileged Access Management has good support. Another valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management is that it's easy to onboard."

"The most valuable features of Sectona Privileged Access Management include robust session monitoring for privileged users."

Cons

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"The stability is not very good."

"The configuration is difficult."

"I would like to see future updates include robust support for cloud environments as organizations increasingly move towards cloud-based solutions."

"Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access Management, as organizations rely on stability. When it becomes unstable, it causes panic."

"As I don't have at least one to two years of experience with Sectona Privileged Access Management, I cannot share areas for improvement in the solution. To me, Sectona Privileged Access Management has reasonable pricing, but it could still be improved. I'm also unsure if Sectona Privileged Access Management could cover the requirements of large-sized companies, but for small-sized to medium-sized companies, I'd recommend the solution."

"Sectona needs to think about SaaS solutions and cloud use cases. For example, we need to be able to integrate Sectona PAM with next-generation applications such as Docker and Lambda, as well as ITD pipelines that use privileged user data."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"The licensing cost for Sectona Privileged Access Management is reasonable, though I cannot share the figure because that's confidential information. I'm not paying for additional costs because the current license covers my requirements. I'd rate the pricing for Sectona Privileged Access Management a three on a scale of one to five."

"Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very good price range."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Sectona Privileged Access Management?

The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access M...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 17% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 10% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 8% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 7% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 49% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 29% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 22% of the time

More Sectona Privileged Access Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

January 2026

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

Sectona Privileged Access Management

January 2026

Sectona Privileged Access Management report

Download Sectona Privileged Access Management product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

No data available

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Fudo Security

Sectona is a Privileged Access Management company that helps enterprises mitigate risk of targeted attacks to privileged accounts spread across data centers and cloud. Sectona delivers integrated privilege management components for securing dynamic remote workforce access across on-premises or cloud workloads, endpoints and machine to machine communication.

Sectona with its light, integrated approach provides a single console for securing passwords & secrets in embedded vault, secure access with cross-platform access technology & manage privileges over endpoints.

Sectona

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

December 2025

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. Sectona Privileged Access Management report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.