Sectona Privileged Access Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Sectona and Broadcom are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Sectona is ranked #29, while Broadcom is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5. Sectona holds a 1.0% mindshare in PAM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sectona users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Read 4 Sectona Privileged Access Management reviews

1,014 Views
1,014 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Read 53 Symantec Privileged Access Manager reviews

4,047 Views
3,399 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Symantec Privileged Access Manager and Sectona Privileged Access Management are key players in the privileged access solutions market. Sectona seems to have an upper hand due to its integration capabilities and customization, despite Symantec's strong security protocols.

Features: Symantec Privileged Access Manager offers advanced security protocols, expandability, and reliable access controls. Sectona Privileged Access Management provides seamless integration with IT infrastructure, intuitive control processes, and flexible user access policies.

Room for Improvement: Symantec users see a need for better reporting and analytics, a more user-friendly interface, and easier updates. Sectona users desire improved scalability, more comprehensive training resources, and enhanced backup options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec has a detailed deployment process that is complex but benefits from robust and responsive customer support. Sectona's deployment is faster and simpler, though its customer service could be more proactive.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec has a higher initial setup cost but provides significant ROI with its comprehensive security. Sectona offers a more cost-effective upfront investment, with some users noting that faster integration reduces operational costs over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sectona Privileged Access M...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

29th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Symantec Privileged Access ...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Sectona Privileged Access Management is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Privileged Access Manager is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Symantec Privileged Access Manager	2.0%
Sectona Privileged Access Management	1.0%
Other	97.0%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Ameya Mahale

Technical Consultant at Netpoleon India

A PAM solution that helps to ensure data security and compliance

The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session recording feature is particularly noteworthy because it utilizes minimal storage. Instead of recording entire sessions, it captures activity only when necessary, optimizing storage space. The tool offers a unique feature called the plugin designer, which is distinct in the market. They don't charge for custom connectors; their plugin designer tool is user-friendly. End customers can use it to design the initial steps of connectors. The tool's session management significantly improves your security posture by completely isolating sessions from user devices. This means that even if a user's endpoint is vulnerable or infected, it will not compromise the server they are working on. The session runs on a secure, isolated PAM server; the user only interacts with it through a secure channel.

Read full review

Muzi Lubisi

Senior technical Consultant at CA Africa

Secure management of sensitive servers and seamless applications with direct linking

The credential injection feature is highly valued, particularly for RDP sessions. A majority of customers use it for RDP, and a couple for Linux servers. The broader capabilities, including access to multiple systems, web-based applications, and clustering, have never posed an issue. The threat analytics aspect is also a robust feature that analyzes all pertinent information.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A key factor for my company is support, and Sectona Privileged Access Management has good support. Another valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management is that it's easy to onboard."

"The most valuable feature of Sectona Privileged Access Management for protecting Privileged accounts is its built-in launcher. Additionally, the single sign-on capability is good. Sectona's session recording feature is particularly noteworthy because it utilizes minimal storage. Instead of recording entire sessions, it captures activity only when necessary, optimizing storage space."

"The most valuable features of Sectona Privileged Access Management include robust session monitoring for privileged users."

"The most valuable feature is the risk management. When a Privileged user performs a certain command, such as running a script, the system highlights it in the risk management section as high, critical, or medium risk."

"The possibility to control the remote activity and establish different policies, because it depends on the position of workers, how much access they needed, and in what platforms they connect, and the possibility to separate this in an easy way is very useful."

"For me, it is the robust API which is the most valuable feature. This allows for low maintenance costs and allows applications to automatically connect. This is great to automate security of the DevOps pipeline for shared secrets across environments. Also, being on Linux and a virtual appliance is great."

"The exposure of sensitive usernames and passwords has been limited in a massive way."

"CA PAM is working well for us."

"Transparent login for users of privileged IDs (Linux, Windows). This prevents sharing of the password because it is never seen."

"The access control component is solid, adding another layer of security beyond the basic OS security of Linux and Windows while keeping administration costs the same across different operating systems."

"According to the users who have actually used CyberArk and CA PAM, they have said that CA PAM is ten times easier to use and manage."

"If I remember correctly, it was the two factor authentication, and the single most important capability was it supported PIV and CAC as one of the two factors."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager pros

Cons

"As I don't have at least one to two years of experience with Sectona Privileged Access Management, I cannot share areas for improvement in the solution. To me, Sectona Privileged Access Management has reasonable pricing, but it could still be improved. I'm also unsure if Sectona Privileged Access Management could cover the requirements of large-sized companies, but for small-sized to medium-sized companies, I'd recommend the solution."

"Sectona Privileged Access Management needs to improve its stability. It needs to enhance the product's stability because of frequent updates. This is crucial for a solution like Privileged Access Management, as organizations rely on stability. When it becomes unstable, it causes panic."

"I would like to see future updates include robust support for cloud environments as organizations increasingly move towards cloud-based solutions."

"Sectona needs to think about SaaS solutions and cloud use cases. For example, we need to be able to integrate Sectona PAM with next-generation applications such as Docker and Lambda, as well as ITD pipelines that use privileged user data."

"To me, Sectona Privileged Access Management has reasonable pricing, but it could still be improved."

"There are currently other tools on the market which are much cheaper than PAM. They can do almost all of what PAM does, and even do it better."

"We experience stability issues after every patch upgrade. This is a place where CA needs to improve drastically."

"The response time for support could be faster. Some features should be added: cloud-based, VPN-less, more secure, and it should be adjusted in a hybrid environment."

"Be prepared to call tech support a lot because the documentation is almost worthless."

"The cons are that you are rarely (if ever) able to talk to a technician when calling support."

"So far, with the functionality of what we had, there has not been much improvement at this point of time."

"A better discovery interface of accounts. It does do discovery of accounts for Windows servers, and you could do UNIX servers as well, but it's kind of clunky how it does it."

"I would like this solution to be simpler. It should have a one-click access that works together with AWS."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sectona Privileged Access Management's pricing is relatively cheaper and aggressive. It is affordable, especially for the Indian market and globally. Compared to competitors, Sectona offers a very good price range."

"The licensing cost for Sectona Privileged Access Management is reasonable, though I cannot share the figure because that's confidential information. I'm not paying for additional costs because the current license covers my requirements. I'd rate the pricing for Sectona Privileged Access Management a three on a scale of one to five."

"Cost-wise, CA was better compared to others in the market. "

"I would prefer better licensing options for the 20-100 users we have at a given time."

"Don’t go with an agent model. Don’t go with a model that has you buying a thousand different parts. Go with PAM that gives you everything, or you’ll just be paying costs of implementing another tool that PAM would have just given you up front."

"It is more expensive than other solutions on the market."

"The licensing is simple and scalable."

"The prices are not low, but one can ask for a discount. It’s not the cheapest PAM solution."

"The version we are using is affordable compared to BeyondTrust, which is maybe three to four times as expensive, but it depends on the features."

"Appliances are relatively cheap, don’t skimp. Make sure you have redundancy, high availability, and enough appliances to manage the concurrent workload."

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

Due to the nature of the solution, it is hard to gauge, but compared to competitors, the pricing is very good. I would rate it as an eight and a half out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

Recent releases need improvement in webpage management. For instance, navigating through a webpage that acts like a wizard, where I proceed to the next page and enter more information, is not handl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Privileged Access Manager?

With the customers that I have so far, I help them broker RDP sessions to sensitive servers, particularly those that manage aspects like physical access. I have also done it for backend databases, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 20% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 12% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 9% of the time

Fudo PAM vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 8% of the time

Safeguard by One Identity vs Sectona Privileged Access Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Sectona Privileged Access Management Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 25% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Safeguard by One Identity vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sectona Privileged Access Management

October 2026

Sectona Privileged Access Management report

Download Sectona Privileged Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Privileged Access Manager

October 2026

Symantec Privileged Access Manager report

Download Symantec Privileged Access Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite, CA Privileged Access Manager

Overview

Sectona Privileged Access Management is designed to enhance security by efficiently managing privileged access and identities within organizations, providing session isolation and recording, password management, and security compliance.

Sectona Privileged Access Management offers a comprehensive suite to monitor and secure access to critical servers and enhance authorization. Features include single sign-on, video logging, and agentless technology, supporting compliance standards like PCI DSS. Challenges include stability due to frequent updates, the need for a more user-friendly interface, better scalability compared to SaaS platforms, and improved cloud support and management by location.

What are the key features of Sectona Privileged Access Management?

Built-in Launcher: Facilitates seamless access and operation.
Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access management.
Session Recording: Efficiently uses minimal storage for detailed activity logs.
Session Management: Provides comprehensive user activity insights.
Risk Management: Utilizes risk-based scoring and command restriction.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Onboarding: Smooth integration process for teams.
Effective Support: Reliable customer assistance enhances user experience.
Security Insights: Increased visibility into privileged user activities and potential risks.
Flexibility: Offers adaptable deployment options including on-premise and cloud.

Sectona Privileged Access Management is widely implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where securing sensitive data and managing privileged identities is critical. Organizations utilize its capabilities for monitoring critical systems, securing session access, and aligning with industry-specific compliance requirements.

Sectona

Symantec Privileged Access Manager provides enterprises with advanced capabilities in managing access and security compliance, emphasizing seamless integration and scalability. Organizations leverage it for simplified access control and proactive security management to enhance data privacy.

It's designed for managing privileged access across diverse IT environments, featuring easy deployment and configuration along with robust integration capabilities. Users benefit from its scalable architecture, transparent login procedures, and comprehensive password management. Despite its strengths, some challenges persist with the interface, policy management, and upgrade processes. Session recording limitations and documentation gaps are noted, impacting overall user satisfaction. Integration with specific systems, especially mainframes, and a restrictive pricing model present challenges. Nonetheless, its role in managing admin access and reducing security threats in Linux and Windows environments remains critical. Enhanced security is further achieved through integration with CA strong authentication.

What features does Symantec Privileged Access Manager offer?

Easy Deployment and Configuration: Quick setup process with intuitive functionality.
Password Management: Automated rotation of random, strong passwords.
Integration with Active Directory: Direct and seamless connectivity for user management.
Session Recording: Comprehensive logging of user activity for audit purposes.
Credential Injection: Secured access without revealing passwords to users.

What benefits should organizations look for?

Scalability: Supports growth and complex enterprise environments.
Security Compliance: Enhances data protection and regulatory adherence.
Transparency: Simplified login and access management for users.
Cost Efficiency: Potential reduction in security incidents and associated costs.

Organizations in the financial sector appreciate its effective management of privileged accounts across IT infrastructures, including servers and applications. It's valued for its role in RDP and SSH session facilitation and focus on enterprise-level security, crucial for identity governance and protecting high-stakes data.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft

Buyer's Guide

Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

September 2026

Free Report: Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sectona Privileged Access Management vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.