OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Galen Framework compete in the developer-focused testing solutions category. Galen Framework has the upper hand in features due to its comprehensive offerings, while OpenText is preferred for its support.
Features: OpenText is notable for its extensive testing capabilities, access to vast libraries, and integration with popular development tools. Galen Framework is distinguished by its robust layout testing, simple scripting language, and extensive browser support. The key difference is Galen's focus on visual and responsive testing compared to OpenText's broader testing spectrum.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers streamlined deployment along with dedicated customer support, easing integration into existing systems. Galen Framework, despite lacking customer service, offers a straightforward standalone setup with extensive documentation. The contrast lies in OpenText's tailored support services versus Galen's reliance on community-driven assistance.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing for Developers involves a higher initial cost but provides a significant ROI through its comprehensive offerings and support. Galen Framework presents financial efficiency with a lower upfront cost and no support expenses, highlighting its cost-effective open-source model. The distinction is in OpenText's premium features and support versus Galen's economical approach.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| Galen Framework | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.
Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.
Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
