Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Gigamon and Zenoss are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Gigamon is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5, while Zenoss is ranked #13. Gigamon holds a 2.9% mindshare in EM, compared to Zenoss’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gigamon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Read 9 Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline reviews

6,561 Views
262 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

4,409 Views
529 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Zenoss Cloud and Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline compete in the IT monitoring and network insights domain. Zenoss Cloud has an edge in scalability and seamless cloud service integration.

Features: Zenoss Cloud offers real-time analytics, cloud service integration, and a flexible discovery mechanism. It supports multiple clouds like Azure and AWS. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline provides advanced network visibility, packet filtering capability, and encryption management, enhancing network analysis and performance.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could enhance its integration with non-cloud services, improve user-friendliness for non-technical users, and expand its analytics suite. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline might benefit from simplifying its setup, improving intelligence on traffic flow analysis, and offering more robust built-in security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud's deployment is straightforward and cloud-based, with effective customer support aiding onboarding. Gigamon requires a more complex deployment model needing skilled technical support but offers extensive network coverage.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud presents a cost-effective setup ideal for cloud-focused organizations, offering significant ROI by reducing overheads. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline involves upfront costs, with higher ROI through detailed network analysis valuable for enterprises with extensive monitoring needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Zenoss Cloud

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (43rd), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (32nd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (44th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (33rd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (26th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (1st), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (16th)

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Event Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (21st), Network Monitoring Software (70th), Server Monitoring (26th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (54th), Container Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (42nd), AIOps (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is 2.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 5.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zenoss Cloud	5.1%
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline	2.9%
Other	92.0%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

TuanNguyen13

Senior Relationship Banker at Joint stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of V

Experience boosts operational efficiency while performance sees room for improvement

I don't have specific information on whether it was purchased on the AWS marketplace or somewhere else. I am working with Dynatrace Operator. I am also working with Algosec, Alluvio, CrowdStrike, Firemon, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, and other solutions. I think it's a good tool, and I am satisfied with it. We have not stored cloud workloads with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline yet; we are still on-premises. The technical support takes about one to two hours to respond, which is acceptable. I am satisfied with the scalability of the product. The interface is good.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good product, it provides network visibility, which is important, Gigamon can bring some optimizations to my network, it is helpful for security inspection, and it makes my firewall work fast because my firewall doesn't have to do the inspection of the SSL connections, for example."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the encryption feature. From a security perspective, the solution hasn't significantly strengthened our security posture. However, it has greatly improved performance by streamlining encryption processes and avoiding encryption at multiple layers. This has also simplified troubleshooting, as we can whitelist certain processes."

"We use Gigamon for network visibility."

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"It offers straightforward integration."

"The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability."

"The Pipeline's Comprehensive Insights into data flows have helped improve operational efficiency and security."

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline pros

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"With this solution, they can have one million users at the same time with no crashes."

"Zenoss is more complex than LogicMonitor, but scalable and hugely customizable."

"It is the most flexible solution of this type, but it takes time to adapt."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

More Zenoss Cloud pros

Cons

"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic."

"The security should be improved."

"They should increase the solution's cluster capacity."

"The Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline should have a feature showing the traffic flow within its platform. Currently, customers have to use separate tools for monitoring, which is inconvenient. If it had its visibility feature, it would make monitoring easier and more complete without needing extra tools."

"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic. There should be different kinds of use cases."

"Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good."

"In terms of improvement, while the initial setup is not overly complicated, we did encounter a few issues."

"The security should be improved."

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline cons

"This solution is complex for beginners so it takes some time to learn."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. The administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

More Zenoss Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"I would rate the solution as expensive, around an eight or nine out of ten. There are other competitive solutions available."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good. They need to improve their performance.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

I am working with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Firemon, and I have been working with it for a year.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

Niagara Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 3% of the time

Grafana vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 3% of the time

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios Core vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Event Monitoring

May 2026

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline report

Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

April 2026

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

Gigamon, GigaSecure

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline boosts network visibility and performance through features like NetFlow and deduplication, facilitating data flow insights and improved security. It supports traffic monitoring and management across various infrastructures.

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline enhances network management by offering features such as NetFlow, deduplication, header stripping, and packet filtering. These capabilities are instrumental in optimizing performance, offering users stability and improved encryption processes. Despite its robust hardware capabilities, it requires enhancements in security, filtering, and delivery time for hardware. Users note challenges with monitoring cloud networks and insufficient cluster capacity. There is also a call for improved interface design and internal traffic flow visualization.

What are the essential features of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

NetFlow: Provides comprehensive visibility into network traffic for informed decision-making.
Deduplication: Reduces unnecessary data replication, enhancing performance and efficiency.
Header Stripping: Streamlines data packets by removing unnecessary headers, improving speed.
Packet Filtering: Enables selective traffic analysis for targeted network insights.
Traffic Aggregation: Consolidates and transforms network data, aiding detailed packet analysis.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Enhanced Security: Improves data integrity and threat detection capabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines traffic monitoring and performance processes.
Improved Data Insights: Offers comprehensive data flow analysis for better decision-making.
Hardware Stability: Provides reliable performance with robust hardware support.
Encryption Optimization: Simplifies the encryption process for secure data handling.

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline finds application across industries for network visibility and management. It is used extensively for traffic monitoring, SSL inspection, mobile network oversight, and data center operations. Organizations leverage its capabilities to address network issues, enhance security, and streamline performance monitoring processes. Its ability to group traffic aids significantly in problem-solving and SSL detection.

Gigamon

Zenoss Cloud provides a comprehensive overview of IT environments, supporting cross-cloud functionality, scalability, and robust integrations. It offers dynamic monitoring through its intuitive dashboard and supports hybrid deployments across cloud and on-premises infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud enables users to monitor network infrastructure and operator platforms efficiently. With features like agentless monitoring and real-time alerts, Zenoss Cloud integrates seamlessly with external systems such as ITSM tools. Its flexible functionality allows for the management of both on-premises and cloud infrastructures like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from easy setup and strong technical support, although they seek enhancements in AI capabilities and simpler installation. The pricing model and complexity for beginners and storage monitoring are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of Zenoss Cloud?

Dynamic Monitoring: Enhances user experience with real-time insights.
Cross-Cloud Functionality: Supports hybrid deployments across AWS and Azure.
Agentless Monitoring: Simplifies deployment with minimal overhead.
Scalability: Grows with your network's demands.
Custom Integration: Supports notifications and alerts tailored to user requirements.

What benefits should users expect from Zenoss Cloud?

Time Efficiency: Quick setup and operation save resources.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive documentation streamlines troubleshooting.
Cost-effective Monitoring: Prevents multiple charges in server monitoring.
Enhanced User Experience: Offers seamless integration with existing IT infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud is widely used in monitoring solutions for industries including technology and data centers. It supports direct monitoring of systems like vSphere and NetApp, making it ideal for IT operations and managed services. Integration with tools such as ServiceNow and SolarWinds aligns it with diverse IT environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Amica Insurance, College of William & Mary, Gamma, IntercontinentalExchange, OppenheimerFunds

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Zenoss Cloud

April 2026

Free Report: Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.