

Microsoft Power Apps and GitHub CoPilot compete in the area of software development and business process automation. Microsoft Power Apps holds an advantage in integration and ease of use, while GitHub CoPilot excels in AI-driven code generation.
Features: Microsoft Power Apps provides robust data connectivity, integration across Microsoft products, and user-friendly design for non-engineers, enabling swift business process automation. GitHub CoPilot offers AI-driven code generation and real-time coding assistance, significantly enhancing developer productivity with its capabilities in code suggestion and auto-completion.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Power Apps would benefit from improved integration with non-Microsoft tools and enhanced capabilities for large datasets as current record limits exist. Enhancements in documentation and debugging tools are also needed. GitHub CoPilot should focus on improving suggestion accuracy and broadening integration with various IDEs to enhance the user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Power Apps is versatile, supporting deployment across private, public, and hybrid clouds, though customer support consistency could be improved. GitHub CoPilot integrates effectively with GitHub Enterprise as a cloud service and provides generally responsive customer support, although quality may vary across different support channels.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Power Apps is competitively priced within Microsoft ecosystems, offering significant ROI through process automation and integration, though costs can increase with premium connectors. GitHub CoPilot is considered reasonably priced within GitHub Enterprise agreements, offering substantial time savings and enhanced coding efficiency, despite potential licensing costs.
A lot of time is saved using GitHub CoPilot because the PR review process used to take two to three days, but now it takes about two to three minutes to analyze the complete PR, get context, and give the rating.
Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs.
The connection between Power Apps and Power BI simplifies generating and presenting reports, alleviating the workload and enhancing productivity.
The aim is to create a cleaner interface to replace spreadsheets, thus standardizing processes and improving efficiency.
With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.
Whenever there's a downtime of GitHub CoPilot or any issue with login or plugins, customer support is good enough to solve those issues.
GitHub technical support is excellent.
They are probably adequate for pretty vanilla type of requirements or support tickets, but when it actually comes to something in-depth, I would not rate them more than six or seven, maximum seven.
Their assistance was crucial as we developed the solutions.
Community support is closer to an eight or nine since there's a big enough community that someone has likely faced the same problem and posted about it, improving the community overall.
It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention.
Multiple people using it get a lot of immediate and exact responses useful for fixing issues, debugging, automating, or enhancing features.
With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.
If it is flexible and includes premium connectors, scalability is easy.
It is quite scalable, though there are some limitations regarding the number of records.
In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.
At certain times, you may not get the required response and realize it's either down or not responding for other reasons.
I have not really seen any performance issues, slowness, or response time.
I would rate the stability of Microsoft Power Apps as a nine out of ten.
Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.
There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.
To understand our application better and learn from it would likely require access to the entire codebase, which a lot of companies may not allow.
This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
These tools should be intuitive for business users who will need at least a week of training to use them effectively.
In many use cases, applications might require importing data exceeding two thousand records, potentially reaching one hundred thousand.
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.
The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.
For small to medium enterprises, it is affordable, especially with Microsoft Enterprise licensing.
For more elaborate work, an upgrade to an enterprise license, costing around $35 per license, is needed.
It is in the middle range and considered reasonable given the current price.
It is certainly time-saving; we have seen upwards of around 30% plus of time savings using GitHub CoPilot.
Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour.
Context awareness, inline autocompletions, rapid code prototyping, Agentic mode, and availability in multiple language IDEs are the best features of GitHub CoPilot.
It integrates seamlessly with Power Automate for process automation and connects with email, SharePoint, Power BI, and MS Teams, facilitating everyday processes.
Canvas Apps provide complete user design flexibility with many connectors to integrate into Microsoft Power Apps, making it efficient to fetch and update information from various data sources such as Dataverse, Excel, SharePoint, and Azure.
I run a couple of SQL Servers, which are premium connectors in Microsoft Power Apps, and that requires a different licensing model than what a standard E5 license covers.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Power Apps | 9.9% |
| GitHub CoPilot | 4.7% |
| Other | 85.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 50 |
GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.
GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.
What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.
Microsoft Power Apps is a rapid application development software and low-code development platform. The solution consists of a suite of apps, services, connectors, and a data platform. It provides an environment for building custom apps which is suitable for different businesses.
Microsoft Power Apps allows users to not only build applications, but also connect them to Microsoft's other sources, including the underlying data platform Microsoft Dataverse, as well as online and on-premise sources such as SharePoint, Dynamics 365, and Microsoft 365. The applications built using Microsoft Power Apps have a responsive design that makes them suitable for work in browsers and on mobile applications on different devices.
The no-code side of the product makes it suitable for complete beginners to app building, allowing them to easily create fully functional applications with many features. The solution also has a specialized platform for developers where specialists can access data and metadata, create custom connectors, integrate with external data, and apply business logic. The solution allows users to create three types of apps: canvas, model-driven, and portal. They are made using:
Microsoft Power Apps Features
The three different design tools of the solution, Power Apps Studio, App Designer, and Power Apps Portals Studio, come with various features which allow users to utilize the tools. Some of these features include:
Microsoft Power Apps Benefits
The product brings various benefits to organizations and individuals who utilize it. Some of the biggest advantages of Microsoft Power Apps include:
Reviews from Real Users
An IT Specialist (INFOSEC) at a government appreciates this tool because it is low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower.
Rafael T., a data engineer at NTT Security, likes Microsoft Power Apps, because it is great for making apps quickly, has helpful support, and integrates with Power BI.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.