GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

GitHub and Oracle are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. GitHub is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while Oracle is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. GitHub holds a 4.7% mindshare in RADS, compared to Oracle’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

GitHub CoPilot

Read 31 GitHub CoPilot reviews

4,494 Views
2,921 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 6 Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service reviews

1,267 Views
798 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and GitHub CoPilot compete in the application development and AI coding assistance space. GitHub CoPilot is perceived to have the upper hand due to its AI-driven code completion features, which significantly enhance developer productivity.

Features:Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service facilitates application creation with its drag-and-drop interface, integrates seamlessly with Oracle Cloud, and enhances both web and mobile app development. GitHub CoPilot offers real-time code suggestions, multi-language support, and AI-generated code solutions to assist developers, increasing their coding productivity.

Room for Improvement:Oracle Visual Builder could improve by offering more customizable options and enhancing its user interface to attract developers familiar with coding. It could also offer better support for non-Oracle platforms. GitHub CoPilot could improve by enhancing support for more complex coding scenarios, providing better tuning for enterprise environments, and offering more robust integration with other development tools beyond popular IDEs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Oracle Visual Builder presents an easy deployment model with strong integration within the Oracle ecosystem and offers comprehensive customer service. GitHub CoPilot integrates effortlessly with platforms like Visual Studio Code, requiring minimal setup but offers less traditional customer service, relying more on community and online resources.

Pricing and ROI:Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service has a usage-based pricing model suitable for large-scale deployments within the Oracle ecosystem, providing good ROI for organizations heavily invested in Oracle services. GitHub CoPilot uses a subscription model, appealing to developers focused on immediate productivity gains through its advanced AI features. This model provides a dynamic ROI more centered on individual developer enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	4.7%
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.3%
Other	94.0%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages

Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head of Digital Solutions at Wind Integrated Solutions

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The product is easy to integrate."

"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."

"The initial setup of the product is easy."

"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."

"Copilot enhanced our productivity through its AI capabilities."

"The most valuable skill and characteristic of GitHub CoPilot is that you can find any information in seconds."

"I use it almost like a search engine, but it goes a step beyond."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"The tool is very easy to use."

"The initial setup is easy."

Cons

"Sometimes, if it is a bigger piece of code, it breaks in between."

"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."

"It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."

"Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for creating a login page with specific buttons and logic."

"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."

"Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs."

"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"They could simplify the API integrations and allow us to automate certain tasks using our own server without just logging into the web page."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"The tool has minor bugs."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."

"The pricing is reasonable. I think it is 10 USD per user."

"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."

"It's affordable."

"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

For now, I think it is okay. It is not that expensive. The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

The tool is very easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 19% of the time

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Java Cloud Service vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot

January 2026

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

January 2026

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Buyer's Guide

GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.