GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.1%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	6.1%
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.1%
Other	92.8%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla

Software Engineer at Yext Inc

Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration

In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head of Digital Solutions at Wind Integrated Solutions

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."

"The product is easy to integrate."

"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."

"Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs."

"In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement."

"The most valuable skill and characteristic of GitHub CoPilot is that you can find any information in seconds."

"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."

"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."

More GitHub CoPilot pros

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"The tool is very easy to use."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

Cons

"The limitation is based on the training dataset and the number of repositories."

"It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."

"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."

"Sometimes it requires multiple iterations to get the code I need, like for creating a login page with specific buttons and logic."

"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."

"One drawback is that the solution sometimes suggests unwanted code, especially if I accidentally press the tab. This doesn't happen often. Sometimes it seems to understand my code, but other times it doesn't. This inconsistency is confusing."

"They could simplify the API integrations and allow us to automate certain tasks using our own server without just logging into the web page."

"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."

More GitHub CoPilot cons

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

"The tool has minor bugs."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a license but need another one for the GitHub CoPilot tool."

"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."

"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."

"A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."

"The solution is costly."

"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."

"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."

"The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."

More GitHub CoPilot pricing and cost advice

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...

What do you like most about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

The tool is very easy to use.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Comparisons

GitLab vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 26% of the time

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 8% of the time

Qodo Gen vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 25% of the time

OutSystems vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

GitHub CoPilot

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

GitHub CoPilot vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service