No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GitHub Dependabot vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Dependabot
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (7th), Patch Management (5th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of GitHub Dependabot is 3.3%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 3.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Supply Chain Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management3.1%
GitHub Dependabot3.3%
Other93.6%
Software Supply Chain Security
 

Featured Reviews

BB
Full Stack Developer at Accenture India Pvt. Ltd.
Automated security checks have streamlined dependency updates and reduce manual review work
The best features in GitHub Dependabot include its use for vulnerabilities, and most of the things we use it for involve creating pull requests for those dependencies, which is why it is so appealing for customers. The configuration options in GitHub Dependabot have greatly helped me tailor operations to meet my project's needs. We used the YAML file to configure everything, and we use what is called the actions environment, a GitHub environment. We use GitHub environment to configure the confidential data.
Nicki Møller - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Enables automation and quick access to necessary information
One of the significant challenges Qualys is discovery, which I know Microsoft excels at. I can't recall how well Qualys performs this function; it seems I might be missing some details. However, if there's one key aspect to focus on, it's discovery—the ability to identify assets that you are not aware of, even when you can see they are present. Understanding what those assets are is crucial. With Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, it was very difficult to extract detections from the system. The features within Qualys are limited to what they have developed. Sometimes a complete overview is needed to push to a Power BI dashboard, Splunk, ServiceNow, or other platforms. The export process is incredibly challenging. We needed a developer to write a hundred-line Python script that would loop over certain assets due to export limitations. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could improve its integration capabilities. While it generates substantial data, correlating it with other data sources can be challenging. The export process is difficult, and pre-built integrations with other tools could be enhanced for better process implementation.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
7%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GitHub Dependabot?
I do not think there is anything that could be improved about the solution.
What is your primary use case for GitHub Dependabot?
My overall experience with GitHub Dependabot has been positive. When GitHub Dependabot was introduced in 2017, we did not consider it much at that time. However, in 2021, we started working with it...
What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Dependabot?
I do not use GitHub Dependabot compatibility testing; I do not use this feature. My overall review rating for this product is eight.
What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...
What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?
I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker, Qualys, JFrog and others in Software Supply Chain Security. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.