GitHub vs IBM Rational ClearCase comparison

GitHub and IBM are both solutions in the Version Control category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.0. GitHub holds a 7.6% mindshare in VC, compared to IBM’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of IBM users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,586 Views
1,434 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Rational ClearCase

Read 6 IBM Rational ClearCase reviews

837 Views
552 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

GitHub

IBM Rational ClearCase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

IBM Rational ClearCase and GitHub compete in the version control and software development domain. GitHub often holds the advantage due to its features tailored for modern development practices and widespread integration capabilities, which many deem worth the investment.

Features: IBM Rational ClearCase offers advanced version control, dynamic views, and build auditing, adhering to robust compliance standards, ideal for enterprise environments. GitHub provides strong community support, easy collaboration, and seamless integration with development tools like Jira and Jenkins, enhancing team productivity and facilitating open-source contributions.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational ClearCase could enhance its user interface and reduce the complexity of deployment while improving support for modern development processes. It may also benefit from further enhancement of integration capabilities with current DevOps tools. GitHub can improve its support for more extensive enterprise-scale workflows, streamline its administrative features, and enhance offline capabilities for regions with limited connectivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational ClearCase is traditionally more complex to deploy, requiring higher technical expertise and dedicated resources but benefits from robust customer support tailored to enterprise needs. GitHub, with its cloud-based deployment, offers easier setup processes and extensive online resources, significantly simplifying onboarding for development teams.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational ClearCase typically involves significant initial setup costs, reflecting its comprehensive features suited to larger enterprises, showing ROI in scenarios demanding stringent version control. GitHub's pricing model is more accessible, particularly for smaller teams or open-source projects, providing a compelling ROI through reduced costs and increased team efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

IBM Rational ClearCase

Ranking in Version Control

9th

Average Rating

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of GitHub is 7.6%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational ClearCase is 6.3%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Daniel Antonio Jimenez Quintana

IT Systems Architect at Banco Ripley

Difficult to use, not efficient, but stable

We are using IBM Rational ClearCase in Peru at two large banks for a code repository. However, it is not meant to be used as a repository I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly. I have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."

"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"The technical support of the solution is good, and our company has used it for GitHub upgrades."

"Our code is secure."

More GitHub pros

"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment."

"The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, including some change management tools. The overall process was normal."

"IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."

Cons

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

"The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"While using the solution when merging two code branches the code becomes a bit messy. This should be improved in the future."

"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

More GitHub cons

"The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool."

"The protection needs to be improved."

"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"This is a very expensive product."

"IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Rational ClearCase?

The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational ClearCase?

IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ClearCase?

The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs GitHub

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Git vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 40% of the time

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 20% of the time

Bitbucket vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 13% of the time

Apache Subversion vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Rational ClearCase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

August 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

August 2025

Download IBM Rational ClearCase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rational ClearCase

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

IBM Rational ClearCase is an enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets, including requirements, design documents, models, test plans and test results. It be can be integrated with other IBM solutions, including IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearQuest, IBM Rational Asset Manager and IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.

IBM

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Atos SE, FEI, STM

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

July 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.