GitHub vs IBM Rational ClearCase comparison

GitHub and IBM are both solutions in the Version Control category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9, while IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.0. GitHub holds a 5.9% mindshare in VC, compared to IBM’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of IBM users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,060 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Rational ClearCase

Read 6 IBM Rational ClearCase reviews

666 Views
455 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

GitHub

IBM Rational ClearCase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Both IBM Rational ClearCase and GitHub compete in version control and collaboration. GitHub takes the lead with its user-friendly approach and extensive integration options that align with modern development needs.

Features: IBM Rational ClearCase offers robust configuration management, dynamic views, and file versioning, tailored for complex enterprise projects. GitHub provides streamlined collaboration, extensive open-source integrations, and social coding features, appealing to agile teams.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational ClearCase could enhance its modern usability and integration with newer tools. Improvements in user experience and deployment simplicity could also broaden its appeal. GitHub could benefit from offering more advanced enterprise features, enhanced offline capabilities, and improved management of large binary files.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational ClearCase requires extensive setup suitable for complex enterprise needs, with structured support reflecting a traditional approach. GitHub's cloud-based deployment is straightforward and fast, minimizing setup efforts. Its flexible support model is well-suited for dynamic teams.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational ClearCase involves significant initial costs and high operational expenses due to infrastructure demands. Its ROI is aligned with capabilities in managing large projects with strict change control. GitHub's tiered pricing is seen as more cost-effective, supporting diverse team sizes and budgets. The ROI is enhanced by promoting development efficiency and adaptability in agile projects.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

IBM Rational ClearCase

Ranking in Version Control

9th

Average Rating

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Configuration Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of GitHub is 5.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational ClearCase is 3.7%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Daniel Antonio Jimenez Quintana

IT Systems Architect at Banco Ripley

Difficult to use, not efficient, but stable

We are using IBM Rational ClearCase in Peru at two large banks for a code repository. However, it is not meant to be used as a repository I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly. I have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our code is secure."

"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

"GitHub is good for small companies and for personal use."

"If you want to share documents, you can create articles and diagrams with GitHub and share."

"The support team is good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"The code sharing and updated history are valuable features."

More GitHub pros

"ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment."

"The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, including some change management tools. The overall process was normal."

"IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."

Cons

"Github needs more storage."

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

"Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

"GitHub could add more security features. I am not sure how secure it is. If they provide more security features, then it can be used in more official applications."

"The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue."

"I would like a more graphical, user-friendly UI, to avoid writing so much code on cmd."

More GitHub cons

"I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly."

"The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool."

"The protection needs to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"This is a very expensive product."

"IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Rational ClearCase?

The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational ClearCase?

IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ClearCase?

The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Git vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 48% of the time

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 24% of the time

Bitbucket vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs IBM Rational ClearCase

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Rational ClearCase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

March 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Configuration Management

March 2025

Download IBM Rational ClearCase product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rational ClearCase

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

IBM Rational ClearCase is an enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets, including requirements, design documents, models, test plans and test results. It be can be integrated with other IBM solutions, including IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearQuest, IBM Rational Asset Manager and IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.

IBM

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Atos SE, FEI, STM

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

March 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.