OpenText ALM Octane and GitLab are competitive products in the Agile management and DevOps markets. GitLab holds an advantage due to its superior CI/CD pipeline capabilities and ease of use.
Features: OpenText ALM Octane offers comprehensive Agile management capabilities, seamless DevOps integrations, and end-to-end traceability in testing processes. GitLab provides robust CI/CD pipeline capabilities, ease of use, and strong version control management.
Room for Improvement: OpenText ALM Octane could improve in managing different methodologies and administrative functions. It also faces challenges with some missing features like task comments. GitLab could enhance integration beyond Kubernetes, provide better documentation, and reduce pricing for advanced tiers.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM Octane offers on-premises deployment with robust support, including direct R&D involvement. GitLab leverages public cloud deployment, providing straightforward support but sometimes faces delays in problem resolution.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM Octane is expensive, with its comprehensive features justifying its cost. GitLab, starting as open-source, can become costly with scale but offers flexible licensing that users find valuable.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
Roadmaps and Gantt charts in GitLab are not as advanced as in Jira, and changing start and end dates is more laborious in GitLab.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The feature I appreciate the most about GitLab is its ease of use and compatibility, which allows for straightforward building and deployment processes.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
OpenText ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. OpenText fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.
ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
