Gloo Platform vs Postman Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Solo.io and Postman are both solutions in the API Management category. Solo.io is ranked #23 with an average rating of 10.0, while Postman is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8. Solo.io holds a 0.8% mindshare in APIM, compared to Postman’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Solo.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Postman users who would recommend it.

Gloo Platform

Read 3 Gloo Platform reviews

1,310 Views
1,310 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Postman Enterprise

Read 71 Postman Enterprise reviews

9,094 Views
3,729 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Gloo Platform

Postman Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Postman Enterprise and Gloo Platform are products in the API management and microservices infrastructure category. Postman Enterprise holds an edge in pricing, while Gloo Platform presents significant value through its extensive features.

Features: Postman Enterprise provides easy API testing, intuitive collaboration tools, and comprehensive analytics. Gloo Platform offers efficient traffic management, service mesh capabilities, and extensive security integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Gloo Platform ensures streamlined deployment for microservice architectures with proactive customer support. Postman Enterprise focuses on usability with straightforward deployment and responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Postman Enterprise is an economical choice with low initial setup costs, offering viable ROI through accessible pricing. Gloo Platform has a higher cost structure, with substantial ROI from its extensive features, appealing to enterprises looking for comprehensive service mesh solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Gloo Platform vs. Postman Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform vs. Postman Enterprise

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gloo Platform

Ranking in API Management

23rd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Postman Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), AI Software Development (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Gloo Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Postman Enterprise is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Postman Enterprise	2.0%
Gloo Platform	0.8%
Other	97.2%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Hiten Nandasana

Angular developer at Flourish software

Centralized traffic control has improved monitoring and simplified our Kubernetes API management

Gloo Platform features include Kubernetes-native API gateways, routing control, API routing, and seamless integration with various environments. It supports multi-clusters and hybrid cloud deployments, which are the most valuable features for Gloo Platform. Our requirements in our organization are fully satisfied by these features, so we really appreciate using Gloo Platform. Since I have been using Gloo Platform, I have noticed benefits from implementing API Gateway capabilities and controlling traffic routing. I can say that we are saving time, especially regarding control traffic routing, data monitoring, and improving observability of Kubernetes applications. These are the most valuable assets for our organization.

Read full review

RituRaj

SDE 2 at Virtusa

Centralized collaboration has transformed API testing and documentation across multiple teams

In terms of improvement, the UI can sometimes feel heavy for larger collections in the workspaces. Additionally, performance may slow down with complex API projects, and pricing can be expensive for smaller teams. However, it is quite suitable for bigger teams. Other areas for improvement include better reporting and analytics dashboards, and more advanced native test environment features could enhance workflow, with smoother offline support and sync handling. Additionally, better performance for very large collections would be helpful, along with more intuitive navigation for enterprise-scale workspaces, stronger reporting analytics, easier management of permissions across large teams, and more flexible automation and testing report options would be beneficial. Small usability and performance improvements would make Postman Enterprise even more efficient for larger organizations. Postman Enterprise needs better performance optimization for large enterprises, more detailed analytics user reporting, improved API governance and audit visibility, simpler permissions and access control management, faster sync and loading times for larger collections, and more advanced built-in testing and reporting capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You don't need many frameworks or other things to run Glue."

"Gloo Platform's features are optimal for my use case because I have numerous applications and microservices running, requiring rate limiting and traffic management integrated into one platform, which proves very beneficial."

"Organizations are highly recommended to use Gloo Platform because it will have a great impact on their organization."

"In Postman, we have an option to directly import a call, make it a Postman collection, and execute it in a batch. This feature is very useful. It saves a lot of time. The manual effort is also reduced when we can just pick it in a Postman collection and then run and execute it to get the results."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution is stable and provides a good user experience."

"Postman helps us to automate the API testing in the team."

"The solution is simple to use and you can easily store your projects."

"With Postman you can do automation, automation has increased efficiency by more than 30% or 40%, and because the speed has increased, it's also possible for us to do in-sprint automation testing."

"It's easy to see different versions of responses."

"The scripting capabilities in Postman are excellent."

Cons

"I sometimes face issues with integration."

"The management of endpoints' headers sometimes conflicts with APIs that require information in the body, leading to difficulties."

"It would be better if we could integrate programming languages like .NET, Java, and JavaScript. It could also be more user-friendly."

"They can lower the pricing because small teams cannot afford it."

"I don't think there is any need for comments on improvements."

"Initially, the setup is a little bit complex"

"The product lacks a good console."

"The solution can be confusing for first-time users so it could be made a little more user friendly."

"I have recently noticed that, for some reason, I am not able to import collections in JSON. It is weird because I was able to do it before. When you create a new collection and documentation, in tests, you usually have to click Save. If you don't click Save, your collections don't sync with other devices, which is something I don't like. It is not clear for the users in a shared workspace, and I usually forget to click Save and end up losing all the collections that I created. I create a lot of routes, and clicking Save all the time isn't efficient. Instead of clicking Save all the time, there should be an option to save everything in one go."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I am using the free option."

"Postman is a free service."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"The solution has moderate pricing."

"We are using its free version."

"This is an open source solution."

"The solution has a licensing fee which might be prohibitive."

More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	45

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Gloo Platform?

Since I have been using Gloo Platform, our features and functionality fully satisfy our needs, so I do not think there are any improvements needed for this platform. It is fully compatible with our...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gloo Platform?

I primarily use Gloo Platform to manage APIs and implement API Gateway capabilities, control traffic routing, and improve observability across Kubernetes applications. These are the main use cases ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Gloo Platform?

My advice to others is that any user using Kubernetes API gateways and API management will see improvements in traffic control. Organizations are highly recommended to use Gloo Platform because it ...

See all answers

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?

Almost 30% of our time has been saved when it comes to complete regression testing of one feature. That is the rough estimate I can provide.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Postman?

One area for improvement is that sometimes performance is slightly slow when we are handling large collections. Also, we need better integrations with CI/CD tools so that automation would be smooth...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Gloo Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Coralogix vs Gloo Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Gloo Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Gravitee vs Gloo Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Gloo Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Gloo Platform Competitors

Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Apigee vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform

October 2026

Download Gloo Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Postman Enterprise

October 2026

Download Postman Enterprise product report

Overview

Gloo Platform is a versatile API and microservices management tool known for its robust security, seamless integration, and advanced traffic handling capabilities. It effectively bolsters organizational efficiency by improving workflows and reducing manual tasks through automation. Users value its support for multiple languages, comprehensive analytics, and its ability to enhance service mesh implementations for better network management.

Solo.io

Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.

What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?

Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

Postman

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform vs. Postman Enterprise

September 2026

Free Report: Gloo Platform vs. Postman Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Gloo Platform vs. Postman Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gloo Platform vs. Postman Enterprise report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.