GoCD vs Planview AgilePlace comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Thoughtworks and Planview are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Thoughtworks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while Planview is ranked #19. Thoughtworks holds a 1.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to Planview’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Thoughtworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planview users who would recommend it.

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

3,718 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Planview AgilePlace

Read 11 Planview AgilePlace reviews

2,237 Views
1,946 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GoCD

Planview AgilePlace

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

GoCD and Planview AgilePlace are contenders in agile project management and continuous delivery. GoCD is advantageous in automation, while Planview AgilePlace excels in team collaboration and workflow management.

Features: GoCD's pipeline management and version control integrations automate code deployment, providing efficiency in development operations. Its plugin architecture supports extensions but can be limited due to the availability of plugins. Planview AgilePlace offers customizable Kanban boards for task visualization, flexible board layout editing, and advanced reporting features that enhance project management through visual interfaces.

Room for Improvement: GoCD could enhance plugin availability and improve user interface customization for broader adaptability. Simplifying the initial setup process would also benefit new users. Planview AgilePlace could improve by adding more customizable reporting options and streamline the integration process with external data sources. User feedback handling could be accelerated to better align with agile methodologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD provides straightforward deployment suited for CI/CD-focused environments, supported by community efforts. Its transparency in pipeline management aids in team collaboration. Planview AgilePlace's cloud-based solution offers scalable deployment, with robust support channels that ensure assistance is readily available, making it adaptable to organizations of varying sizes.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD being open-source minimizes setup costs, offering high ROI for cost-effective CI/CD implementations. Planview AgilePlace, while having a higher initial cost due to its extensive features, delivers ROI through improved productivity and workflow optimization, benefitting environments focused on strategic project management.

To learn more, read our detailed GoCD vs. Planview AgilePlace Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. Planview AgilePlace

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GoCD

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (18th), Release Automation (14th)

Planview AgilePlace

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

19th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of GoCD is 1.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview AgilePlace is 1.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GoCD	1.5%
Planview AgilePlace	1.9%
Other	96.6%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Nishant Narayan Singh

DevOps Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Simplifies the pipeline process, but the access control system needs enhancement

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified. The folder structure is another aspect that could be enhanced, as all jobs are displayed on a single page without the clear organization seen in Jenkins. Implementing a more structured approach to organizing jobs would improve user experience. AI could simplify job creation. For example, instead of manually editing pipelines as code, an AI tool could allow users to input variables and automatically generate the required jobs. It would help reduce human errors, such as issues that arise from incorrect edits in large code files.

Read full review

it_user1684173

PM Systems Analyst at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Simple and intuitive, useful for agile management, and helpful for planning based on our capacity and meeting our deadlines

Every feature is valuable. LeanKit is a Kanban-based tool where you have a visual interface that you can use to create various cards and to create boards to house those cards. You can create a board for managing project work. You can create a board to do PI planning. It is pretty close to the agile way of doing business. The Board Layout Editor is excellent in terms of flexibility. They have been improving its usability. Their development is very much agile, so for any feedback that we give them, they let us know if and when they would act on our request for enhancements or change, and then they make those changes. They are responsive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"After we switched to GO, each team can set-up their own delivery pipeline and run it themselves."

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"The UI is colorful."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"It has a user-friendly interface, which for free and open-source tools, the UI is really amazing and simple."

"In terms of value added it has more than achieved everything we wanted from it and more."

"I think we tripled our outputs roughly with half the resources."

"LeanKit has also reduced our cycle times."

"People found the ability to set up different lanes and the ability to see where they're within the progress most valuable. They can use different colored cards or sticky notes, and then they can separate out which cards belong to a department or the initiative they're working on. They can filter who's working on it, and I've got good feedback about that."

"Our cycle times have reduced by 50%; they are now half as long as they used to be."

"Adoption across stakeholders and visibility have been the biggest success for us with LeanKit."

"The transparency that it brings is valuable. I like to look at things from all angles, and sometimes, flip chart paper on a wall and sticky notes are better than something on a screen, but the way they've made it accessible from all points for anyone within an organization is great. As a project management guy, sometimes, you have to force people into new environments where they have to see what you're talking about. Any screen is a barrier, and people got to get into the screen. How do you know they do? You don't necessarily know, but you are getting around that barrier with a countermeasure of making it accessible to as many as possible. So, everyone can jump in there and see everything. It is fully transparent, and I like that. This is one thing that helps."

"It makes work visible, so everybody knows where everything is. It uses Kanban, and that makes work visible."

"My team specifically uses our board for all of our Remedy tickets that come in. We had a card for every ticket that we get, and we're able to add the link to that specific ticket there.If I'm out of office, for example, and someone else needs to work a ticket or someone is being contacted to work on a ticket, I don't have to sign on it. Someone else can easily access that ticket because I put the link in there. It's nice. It has a lot of great functionality in there."

More Planview AgilePlace pros

Cons

"User management, Documentation, Advanced GUI functionality."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"GO doesn't come with a lot of out of the box features like other tools, don't expect that you can get it to work by clicking the NEXT button."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"I do not know what it can do in the area of scrum. Maybe it has that functionality. I have never tried to set it up. You think of LeanKit from the perspective of Kanban. I don't know if there is a template for scrum, a scaled agile framework, or any of those scaling frameworks."

"The first one is that Instant Coffee does not save your work very well in terms of saving it in formats that you can then go back and edit as Visio would."

"The biggest improvement would be the API and data connections and making the data more accessible or quicker to access."

"Being able to track actual time on cards or sprints, instead of using just the planned start and stop date, would also be useful. I would like to see something like JIRA has with actual sprint starts and stops."

"Sometimes, we use it for project management lessons learned, and it would be helpful if there was a template set up for something like that because we code different cards based on the category."

"Some aspects of the reporting and dashboard could be improved."

"Our overall impression of Leankit has been very positive, however, our experience with the JIRA integration into our Leankit boards was much harder than we anticipated and that could be improved by simplifying it somehow."

"It is a pretty good product. It is really hard to think of things that I'd want to be improved. Sometimes, we use it for project management lessons learned. So, we have three columns, such as Could be Improved, Keep Doing, and Works Really Well. It would be helpful if there was a template set up for something like that because we code different cards based on the category. For example, if something belongs to the Could be Improved category, we may have those cards as yellow, but then I have to change the color of them and put a header. It is not as smooth, but it still works fine. To be honest, I don't have a lot of complaints about it."

More Planview AgilePlace cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"As far as I understand, it is not an expensive application."

"In general, Planview's cost structure is reasonable. You get quite a lot of functionality for the license cost that you get."

"I don't know what it would be on its own. It was basically included with what we were already paying or using. So, it was a no-brainer. It wasn't like we had to sell the company on making a purchase or anything like that. There weren't any costs that came in after implementing it."

"I don't believe there are any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GoCD?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GoCD?

The solution helps us deploy microservices across multiple environments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GoCD?

We integrate the solution with Git, where we store our code. We use Maven to build the code and tools like SonarQube and Checkmarx for code quality checks. We deploy our services in a Kubernetes-ba...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs GoCD

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GoCD

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 5% of the time

Jira vs GoCD

Compared 5% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 16% of the time

Jira Align vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 15% of the time

Rally Software vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 6% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview AgilePlace Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

August 2026

Download GoCD product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview AgilePlace

September 2026

Download Planview AgilePlace product report

Also Known As

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

Planview LeanKit, LeanKit

Overview

GoCD is an open-source tool under Apache License 2.0, offering hackability and a user-friendly interface. It provides detailed visualization of pipelines, seamless LDAP integration, and efficient management of pipeline groups and roles.

GoCD is widely recognized for its open-source accessibility, offering a robust visual representation of deployment pipelines. Its core features include pipeline as code, allowing streamlined creation and management, and real-time progress monitoring which ensures transparency. Integration with tools like Jenkins and Team City, combined with its infrastructure adaptability to platforms such as Kubernetes and AWS EC2, makes it an essential tool for continuous delivery. While it provides substantial value, enhancements are desired in user management and graphical interface functionalities, making it an attractive choice for tech-savvy teams seeking efficiency in deploying microservices.

What distinguishes GoCD's features?

Hackability: Open to custom solutions under Apache 2.0.
User-Friendly Interface: Intuitive design for seamless operation.
Pipeline Visualization: Detailed visual tracking for deployments.
LDAP Integration: Smooth authentication and access management.
Pipeline as Code: Simplifies pipeline creation and updates.
Role Management: Efficient handling of permissions and groups.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Transparency: Real-time monitoring allows easy progress tracking.
Flexibility: Adapts across deployment platforms like Kubernetes.
Efficiency: Streamline deployment with detailed visualizations.
Cost-Effective: Open-source nature reduces licensing expenses.

In industries such as IT and software, GoCD is deployed as a cornerstone tool for continuous delivery, particularly with microservices across diverse environments. Teams frequently use its plug-in architectures, integrating seamlessly with existing infrastructures like Jenkins, enhancing pipeline management efficacy. Its compatibility with Infrastructure as Code bolsters deployment efficiency, while permissions flexibility aids in securing and managing access in various production and delivery contexts.

Thoughtworks

Planview AgilePlace provides an intuitive platform for managing and visualizing work, supporting task tracking, Kanban boards, and agile management while enhancing collaboration and transparency.

Planview AgilePlace is a tool for tracking and optimizing team workflows through visual boards and advanced features like swim lanes and lean methodologies. It integrates with Power BI, facilitates strategic planning through its card status updates and Scrum integration, and improves project prioritization with resource management and financial tracking. It stands out due to its intuitive design and ease of use. While effective, the platform could enhance integration with Enterprise One and JIRA, improve customization, and offer better time-tracking functionalities. Enhanced reporting, dashboard capabilities, and API access are also anticipated upgrades. Users desire further enhancements in AgilePlace's recurring card functionalities and industry-specific agile project management features.

What are the key features of Planview AgilePlace?

Customizable Kanban Boards: Design boards with swim lanes and dependencies for efficient task management.
Visible Work Tracking: Improve transparency with clear visual workflows and defined card status.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless connectivity with tools like Power BI for improved data analysis.
Efficient Reporting: Generate comprehensive reports to support strategic decisions.
LeanKit's Interface: Navigate tasks easily with an intuitive layout and agile features.

What benefits should users look for in Planview AgilePlace reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Foster teamwork through shared visual management tools.
Strategic Planning: Utilize Scrum integration and resource management for effective planning.
Improved Task Management: Streamline workflows with tailored Kanban boards and visible progress tracking.
Enterprise-wide Integration: Connect with systems like JIRA for comprehensive project oversight.
Usability and Visibility: Benefit from an intuitive platform that simplifies project tracking and execution.

Planview AgilePlace finds application in industries requiring agile management and task visualization, such as technology and finance. It supports project management from initial requests to closure, aligning team priorities and enhancing workflow management. Teams leverage its capabilities for planning, resource allocation, and capital project tracking, integrating seamlessly with enterprise systems to deliver outcomes efficiently.

Planview

Sample Customers

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

REA Group, Thompson Reuters

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. Planview AgilePlace

September 2026

Free Report: GoCD vs. Planview AgilePlace

Find out what your peers are saying about GoCD vs. Planview AgilePlace and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoCD vs. Planview AgilePlace report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.