No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Google Cloud Bigtable vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Bigtable
Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Non-Relational Databases (3rd)
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced
Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (9th), NoSQL Databases (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Bigtable is 6.1%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is 10.3%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed NoSQL Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced10.3%
Google Cloud Bigtable6.1%
Other83.6%
Managed NoSQL Databases
 

Featured Reviews

AS
Team Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Consistent performance and seamless cloud integration enhance analytics capabilities while reducing management complexity
One point for improvement in Google Cloud Bigtable is that people have confusion in mapping. There are many similar products available, and Google has managed services for similar products as well. It would be easier if the journey of knowing when to use Google Cloud Bigtable versus other Cloud SQL and alternates such as Cloud Spanner is made clearer for users. Regarding additional functionality for Google Cloud Bigtable, I am uncertain if LLMs can be integrated or if Google Cloud Bigtable can act as a vector store for LLM-specific use cases where we are interacting or using generative AI capabilities.
Romel Jr Zerna - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at Pioneer Dev AI
Document data has streamlined prototyping and now supports secure cloud deployments
I use the cloud version of the product. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is from MongoDB, though I also use DigitalOcean as a third-party provider. Maybe it's all more about preferences. I think MongoDB Enterprise Advanced has weak support on the ORM side, particularly if you're using Prisma. I think mostly the focus now on the tools we have is PostgreSQL. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is not really used that much on our side for production. It's not really a weak point. It's more of a double-edged sword. If you like document-based management databases and you don't want any migrations, then you go to MongoDB Enterprise Advanced. If you want more secure databases, then you use SQL. On the account management and the way you secure the connection strings, I have utilized advanced security features with MongoDB Enterprise Advanced. I think it's very expensive on the Atlas enterprise side. But if you go to other providers of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, such as DigitalOcean, it may be harder to set up, but they can save you money.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If you have a lot of data, it's really scalable and it's competitive."
"The main benefit I receive from Google Cloud Bigtable is the managed service part."
"The solution is very stable; we've never experienced bugs or glitches, we haven't had crashes, and it works well and as expected 100% of the time."
"The solution is very convenient."
"This solution is much more scalable than more traditional databases - at least the ones we are aware of."
"The most valuable feature is the backup and replication service."
"Bigtable is very user-friendly where streaming data is required."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We capture more than 30 million records every week in IoT NS and MongoDB has been serving us well so far, making it easier to maintain the data with its document-based storage."
"I like the schemaless architecture that it follows. I also like the sharding that it provides."
"We've found the product to be scalable."
"Its flexibility, and cost. It is reasonably priced."
"We can define security rules at the database level or the cluster level to grant or deny access to particular users."
"Now we actually have some results which prove that the MongoDB way is a positive way and this is what we ended up using for other scenarios."
"I value the API integrations."
"It has visible benefits, actually, in terms of price of ownership if you compare it to, for example, Oracle."
 

Cons

"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved."
"Pricing-wise, I find GCP can be a little costly, so I would rate it a 3.5."
"I've used Bigtable for about three or four years."
"The program is rather expensive - it depends on the size of your data."
"The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"When it comes to complex queries, a user can't get any help from a drop-down box and pick columns. It would be great if some improvements could be made in the aforementioned area concerning the solution."
"It would be nice if the pay-as-you-go license were a little cheaper."
"The cost of this product is too expensive."
"I rate the support from MongoDB a four out of five."
"MongoDB should better support small and medium companies. There are a lot of clients out there that are interested, however, they need something lighter and less complex and something not so expensive upfront."
"MongoDB would be improved with more integration, particularly for cloud environments like Google BigQuery."
"So I would say our compatibility and performance are the two things that came up that I know in the project we had problems with."
"Its security features can be better. Sometimes, my higher authority says that we are not going to use MongoDB because it doesn't provide that much security for the RDBMS or relational data that we use for transactions."
"The performance of the solution could be improved."
"Sometimes, the tool goes down temporarily. There are some stability issues in the product."
"They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like to see better pricing. It is not too expensive, but it isn't cheap either."
"If you want support with the solution you will need to purchase a license and not use the open-source version. The license is a little expensive."
"MongoDB is an open-source product."
"I believe that MongoDB is free."
"You only have to pay for the paid version, not the open-source version."
"I currently use the solution's community edition which is free."
"I chose MongoDB because it is cost-effective compared to Oracle, which can be expensive. In addition, MongoDB has good performance and has not caused any issues while working with it. It has been a good choice for me."
"This is an open-source solution."
"The pricing is favorable if you opt to install MongoDB on an Amazon EC2 instance as you won't have to pay for the extra Atlas services and can instead manage the scaling yourself. This allows for a cost-effective solution and using MongoDB on a small scale, I have been able to utilize it for free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business36
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise39
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Bigtable?
One point for improvement in Google Cloud Bigtable is that people have confusion in mapping. There are many similar products available, and Google has managed services for similar products as well....
What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Bigtable?
My main use case for Google Cloud Bigtable is mainly for advertisement-related analytics-related use cases.
What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud Bigtable?
Regarding integration with Google Cloud Bigtable and other Google Cloud services such as Dataflow, Dataproc, and BigQuery, we have not done that integration, but there are connectors available. Som...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?
I think it depends on the provider. For example, on DigitalOcean, they have strict routing. You have to whitelist an IP address, or you risk getting DDoS. Then if you're going for the Atlas one tha...
What needs improvement with MongoDB?
I don't really have a deep dive into it, but I see that MongoDB Enterprise Advanced has RAG and Vertex support. However, we really didn't use it because I think one thing also is that Prisma, the O...
What is your primary use case for MongoDB?
A typical use case for MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is mostly for the database, storing our data.
 

Also Known As

Google BigTable, BigTable
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cognite, Dow Jones, Loblaw Digital
Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Bigtable vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.