Google Cloud Firestore vs Neo4j AuraDB comparison

Google and Neo4j are both solutions in the Managed NoSQL Databases category. Google is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3, while Neo4j is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.9. Google holds a 6.7% mindshare in MND, compared to Neo4j’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Neo4j users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Firestore

Read 3 Google Cloud Firestore reviews

581 Views
418 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Neo4j AuraDB

Read 8 Neo4j AuraDB reviews

634 Views
634 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Firestore

Neo4j AuraDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 15, 2026

Neo4j AuraDB and Google Cloud Firestore are competing products in the cloud database space. Neo4j AuraDB seems to have an advantage in handling complex queries and analytics, whereas Google Cloud Firestore benefits from scalability and real-time data synchronization.

Features: Neo4j AuraDB is based on graph database technology, which supports complex data relationships and advanced analytics. It is ideal for deep link analysis and graph queries. Google Cloud Firestore provides real-time data synchronization, scalability, and consistent data handling, specifically useful for mobile and web applications needing constant updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Neo4j AuraDB offers a straightforward setup with automatic scaling and high reliability due to its cloud architecture. Google Cloud Firestore integrates smoothly within the Google Cloud ecosystem, supported by robust developer tools and customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Neo4j AuraDB offers pricing plans that support scaling needs efficiently, providing good ROI for graph-based workloads. Google Cloud Firestore may be more expensive but offers strong ROI by efficiently handling scalable environments with reduced overhead for applications requiring real-time synchronization and global distribution.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Firestore vs. Neo4j AuraDB Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Firestore vs. Neo4j AuraDB

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Firestore

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (13th)

Neo4j AuraDB

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Firestore is 6.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Neo4j AuraDB is 5.3%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Neo4j AuraDB	5.3%
Google Cloud Firestore	6.7%
Other	88.0%

Managed NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

PrathapSankar

engagement Manager at Capgemini

Has simplified backend development for moderate user applications and supports efficient real-time data updates

A simplified way of building a logical layer on top of Firebase is necessary. Currently, the only option is to use cloud functions or Cloud Run functions. If they come up with an easier way of handling the logical layer between the frontend and backend, that would be beneficial. The UI of Firebase is much better compared to AWS or other Azure, but there is still scope for improving the usability of the UI. Additionally, some more AI features for automation can be added. The security layer can be enhanced, as currently, for data handling, there is just rule-based security; they can add one more layer of data security.

Read full review

Jeff Dalgliesh

Founder at data2

Room for improvement in interface capabilities while rapidly solving domain-specific problems

Neo4j AuraDB is a great tool for understanding connections between things. The best features Neo4j AuraDB offers are that it is easy to quickly build a solution with their tooling. Regarding the tooling, I love how fast it is that you can use NeoDash to quickly mock up a UI, and it is really nice that you can build a GraphQL endpoint to connect it to third-party applications, such as Retool or custom applications that we build for clients. Neo4j AuraDB has impacted my organization positively as it has helped me solve problems much more quickly. A specific example of a problem I solved more quickly with Neo4j AuraDB is that I was able to work with an LLM to build graph data models for domain-specific problems. The collaboration with the LLM and Neo4j AuraDB sped up my process as I'm building a tool on top of Neo4j that allows me to control how I can access data in the graph, and Neo4j had a nice interface that allowed us to work with their underlying data model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are Firestore's query capabilities and its real-time syncing functionality."

"One of the main features of Google Cloud Firestore's document management is the real-time listener; whenever there are any changes in the data, all the documents and applications that are reading through that particular document get automatically notified that there was some change, and automatically all the data gets refreshed."

"I use the solution for maps, saving some locations, and chats."

"The most valuable features of Neo4j AuraDB include its flexible data model and broad language support."

"Integrating the front-end language with Neo4j AuraDB is a very easy process."

"I like the idea of graphs and nodes and the possibilities Neo4j AuraDB offers."

"The tool is easy to use."

"The most beneficial things in terms of AuraDB are its speed, its good pricing, the multi-cloud availability."

"From my experience, I particularly like the professional version. Initially, developers often start with the free variant. Once the project grows, we switch to the professional version, which offers multiple databases, expanded memory, and better scalability. This allows us to handle more data and use cloud scaling features."

"The best features Neo4j AuraDB offers are that it is easy to quickly build a solution with their tooling."

Cons

"For lower volumes, it works fine, but once the volume increases, for use cases where the total number of users is less than 100,000 a month, Firebase is cheaper. But once you go beyond that, it becomes very expensive."

"Firestore needs improvements in its querying capabilities, particularly the ability to join tables and merge data from different tables before sending it to the front end."

"I initially faced a problem creating groups in individual chats."

"During the product's initial setup phase, there were some issues due to disconnections in the tool's network."

"I would love to see a Retool type of interface builder with Neo4j AuraDB."

"I've experienced it crashing a few times, so stability could be better."

"In terms of AuraDB, the conversations have always been around scalability."

"Some features can help if they can visualize graphs better."

"There’s room for improvement in Neo4j AuraDB, especially on the developer side. The learning curve can be steep, and the interface for developing and pushing code can be unnecessarily complex. It might be beneficial to simplify this process to help developers ramp up more quickly. Working with graph databases like Neo4j can be more challenging than standard databases, particularly for juniors and those new to graph technology. Streamlining the development process could make it easier for new users to get up to speed. This would be particularly useful for teams with less experience in graph databases. If I could add a feature to Neo4j AuraDB, I’d focus on improving the Bloom interface. It’s excellent for visualizing smaller datasets, but navigating through it becomes challenging as the data grows—say, past 100,000nodes. The interface works well for beginners but doesn’t scale effectively for more advanced users of large datasets. I want a UI that bridges the gap between the easy-to-use Bloom interface and more complex, text-based tools. This would help manage larger datasets more efficiently and improve performance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I used the free tier."

"The tool's enterprise edition is very expensive."

"Neo4j AuraDB is reasonably priced, especially considering it removes the need for cloud administration and associated costs. It's a good deal for the professional version, as it includes managed services, which reduces the overhead compared to setting up your own infrastructure. The cost can be higher for enterprise-scale projects, but that's often due to the scale and complexity of the project rather than the product itself. Startups sometimes overestimate their needs and jump to enterprise pricing too quickly, leading to higher costs than necessary."

"I am using an open-source version of Neo4j AuraDB."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

13%

Government

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

33%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Firestore?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Firestore?

Firebase is our main backend, so for managing authentications, for managing the backend database, and building cloud functions, it is all through Firebase. In the case of Google Cloud Firestore, th...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud Firestore?

I have experience with Firebase, especially Firebase, then Google Cloud Computing Engine, and then Google Firebase Studio. Google Cloud Firestore is one of the offerings in Firebase, which is basic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Neo4j AuraDB?

It has fair pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neo4j AuraDB?

My main use case for Neo4j AuraDB is solving water optimization problems for oil and gas operations. Neo4j AuraDB helps us resolve those water optimization problems by allowing us to store knowledg...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Neo4j AuraDB?

My advice to others looking into using Neo4j AuraDB is to consider how many graphs you can create as quickly as needed. I think Neo4j AuraDB is doing some amazing things. On a scale of 1-5, I rate ...

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 27% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 12% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud Firestore Competitors

Amazon Neptune vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 31% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 21% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 5% of the time

More Neo4j AuraDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

January 2026

Download Google Cloud Firestore product report

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j AuraDB

January 2026

Download Neo4j AuraDB product report

Also Known As

No data available

Neo4j Aura

Overview

Google Cloud Firestore is a scalable, real-time NoSQL cloud database that provides document-oriented data storage and synchronizes data seamlessly across devices.

Designed for mobile, web, and server development, Firestore allows developers to store and sync data quickly. It supports real-time updates which enable your applications to reflect changes instantly. Firestore is based on a managed infrastructure, relieving developers from server-side maintenance and scalability concerns. It integrates with other Google Cloud services making it a convenient choice for modern app development.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Updates: Firestore automatically synchronizes data across all connected clients in real-time.
Scaling: Dynamically scales to accommodate growing data and user demands.
Offline Persistence: Stores data locally so that applications remain usable in offline mode.
Database Queries: Supports sophisticated queries to filter and retrieve data efficiently.
Security: Provides robust rules-based security for data control.

What benefits and ROI considerations should users review?

Improved Development Speed: Simplifies syncing and storing data, saving development time.
Cost-Effective: Pay-as-you-go pricing model ensures costs align with usage.
Efficiency: Reduced need for backend development enhances productivity.
Reliability: Rest assured with dependable infrastructure that ensures availability.

Firestore is widely used in industries like retail, where apps require real-time inventory tracking and customer insights. In health tech, it's utilized for patient data management, ensuring real-time updates across platforms while adhering to security protocols. Educational tech companies implement the database to provide an interactive learning experience with live collaboration features.

Google

Neo4j AuraDB offers a flexible data model with extensive language integration and seamless multi-cloud accessibility. Known for scalability and performance, it supports efficient graph-based data handling across diverse applications.

Neo4j AuraDB is recognized for its comprehensive graph database capabilities, providing scalability, speed, and integration with multiple programming languages and tools. Its dedicated query language and AWS Cloud hosting enhance reliability and performance. While improvements in stability and GUI are necessary, its ability to handle graph data effectively aids in AI-driven projects and relationship-centric modeling. Researchers utilize it for cipher language studies and scalable databases, tackling diverse industry challenges.

What are the key features of Neo4j AuraDB?

Flexible Data Model: Adapts to varied workloads and requirements.
Broad Language Integration: Supports multiple programming languages for development versatility.
Multi-cloud Availability: Provides seamless deployment across different cloud platforms.
Graph-based Data Handling: Efficiently manages complex data relationships.
NeoDash Support: Facilitates quick application development with comprehensive tools.
Dedicated Query Language: Optimized for performance and reliability for graph queries.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Neo4j AuraDB?

Scalability: Suitable for both small and large-scale graph database projects.
Performance: High-speed data processing for efficient application performance.
Reliability: AWS Cloud hosting ensures consistent uptime and security.
AI Integration: Provides contextual insights beneficial for data-driven initiatives.
Development Versatility: Supports a range of programming languages for diverse development needs.

Neo4j AuraDB is employed in industries like oil and gas, where companies address water optimization and construct knowledge graphs. It excels in relationship-centric modeling, handling structured and unstructured data for comprehensive insights, proving essential for graph-based reasoning in diverse applications.

Neo4j

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Firestore vs. Neo4j AuraDB

December 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Firestore vs. Neo4j AuraDB

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Firestore vs. Neo4j AuraDB and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Firestore vs. Neo4j AuraDB report.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.