Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Google Cloud Firestore Logo

Top 10 Google Cloud Firestore Alternatives

Vendor: Google
4.3 out of 5
Start review

Top Google Cloud Firestore Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Google Cloud Firestore based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Redis, MongoDB, and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Google Cloud Firestore surpasses its competitors by offering seamless real-time synchronization, robust offline support, and effortless scalability, ensuring efficient data handling and superior user experiences for developers in web, mobile, and server applications.

Google Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Google, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Google Cloud Firestore Logo
Redis
4.4 out of 5
Google Cloud Firestore Logo
Redis
4.4 out of 5
Redis is favored for its exceptional speed ideal for real-time applications. In comparison, Google Cloud Firestore offers cloud integration and scalability suitable for modern applications. Redis benefits budget-sensitive projects, while Firestore provides greater value through enhanced features and scalability for cloud-based deployments.
Download Google Cloud Firestore vs. Redis Report
Redis has no initial setup cost, making it cost-effective for startups, while Google Cloud Firestore imposes initial setup fees, potentially impacting the budget for smaller projects.
View comparison
Pricing
Redis has no initial setup cost, making it cost-effective for startups, while Google Cloud Firestore imposes initial setup fees, potentially impacting the budget for smaller projects.
Google Cloud Firestore Logo
MongoDB
4.1 out of 5
Google Cloud Firestore Logo
MongoDB
4.1 out of 5
MongoDB offers open-source flexibility and extensive customization for diverse environments. In comparison, Google Cloud Firestore provides seamless Google Cloud integration and efficient scalability. MongoDB suits those needing adaptability, while Firestore attracts users seeking integrated cloud services and scalable infrastructure.
Download Google Cloud Firestore vs. MongoDB Report
MongoDB setup costs are generally lower, providing more cost-effective options for small to medium deployments, while Google Cloud Firestore incurs higher expenses due to its scalability and integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
MongoDB setup costs are generally lower, providing more cost-effective options for small to medium deployments, while Google Cloud Firestore incurs higher expenses due to its scalability and integration capabilities.
Google Cloud Firestore Logo
Google Cloud Firestore Logo
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution and multi-model support ideal for enterprise-level needs. In comparison, Google Cloud Firestore's integration with Firebase simplifies deployment for real-time applications, appealing to developers prioritizing serverless architecture. Cosmos DB's features suit comprehensive models, while Firestore benefits cost-effective, streamlined projects.
Download Google Cloud Firestore vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's setup costs can be higher due to its comprehensive feature set, whereas Google Cloud Firestore offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's setup costs can be higher due to its comprehensive feature set, whereas Google Cloud Firestore offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup.

Related categories

NoSQL Databases
Managed NoSQL Databases
In-Memory Data Store Services