Google Cloud Firestore vs Redis comparison

Read 23 Redis reviews

5,427 Views
1,085 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Firestore

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Redis and Google Cloud Firestore compete in the database market. Firestore seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive cloud integration and feature set.

Features: Redis offers in-memory architecture that ensures exceptional speed, making it suitable for data caching, session storage, and real-time analytics. Firestore provides robust query capabilities, real-time database syncing, and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Redis deployment is straightforward with various hosting options, benefiting from flexible support through its open-source community and commercial plans. Firestore benefits from Google's infrastructure for smoother integration within the Google Cloud ecosystem and extensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: Redis offers competitive pricing, especially for its open-source version, delivering ROI through performance enhancements. Firestore, while potentially more expensive, offers ROI with automatic scaling and reduced management overhead, justifying its costs through efficiency and productivity benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Firestore vs. Redis Report (Updated: January 2026).

Google Cloud Firestore vs. Redis

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Firestore

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

14th

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Redis

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

5th

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

In-Memory Data Store Services (1st), Vector Databases (3rd), AI Software Development (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Firestore is 2.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redis is 9.1%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Redis	9.1%
Google Cloud Firestore	2.9%
Other	88.0%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

PrathapSankar

engagement Manager at Capgemini

Has simplified backend development for moderate user applications and supports efficient real-time data updates

A simplified way of building a logical layer on top of Firebase is necessary. Currently, the only option is to use cloud functions or Cloud Run functions. If they come up with an easier way of handling the logical layer between the frontend and backend, that would be beneficial. The UI of Firebase is much better compared to AWS or other Azure, but there is still scope for improving the usability of the UI. Additionally, some more AI features for automation can be added. The security layer can be enhanced, as currently, for data handling, there is just rule-based security; they can add one more layer of data security.

Read full review

KarimGarchi

Database Admin and Architect at D-EDGE Hospitality Solutions

Performance shines with seamless session caching and minimal configuration

The best features of Redis, from my personal perspective, are the performance, which is very quick, and it's very simple to implement. Since I started using Redis, I feel that the product is saving me some performance tuning time. It's very easy, I have few parameters to tune, and it seems to have performance without a lot of working on the performance, compared to Cassandra, where you have to configure the memory and many other settings. The integration capability of Redis is excellent. Redis is very affordable because it's free.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the main features of Google Cloud Firestore's document management is the real-time listener; whenever there are any changes in the data, all the documents and applications that are reading through that particular document get automatically notified that there was some change, and automatically all the data gets refreshed."

"The most valuable features are Firestore's query capabilities and its real-time syncing functionality."

"I use the solution for maps, saving some locations, and chats."

"The ability to fetch and save data quickly is valuable."

"Redis is a simple service that does what it promises."

"Redis has multiple valuable features such as being a free and reliable open-source tool."

"I use Redis mostly to cache repeated data that is required."

"Redis provides an easy setup and operation process, allowing users to quickly connect and use it without hassle."

"The most valuable features of Redis are its ease of use and speed. It does not have access to the disc and it is fast."

"I find Redis valuable primarily for its caching capabilities, particularly in handling cache requests effectively. Its simplicity in managing key-value pairs for caching is one of its strengths, making it a preferred choice over more complex databases like MongoDB for specific use cases. However, I haven't explored Redis extensively for managing complex data structures beyond caching, as MongoDB might be more suitable for such scenarios."

"The product offers fast access to my database."

More Redis pros

Cons

"For lower volumes, it works fine, but once the volume increases, for use cases where the total number of users is less than 100,000 a month, Firebase is cheaper. But once you go beyond that, it becomes very expensive."

"I initially faced a problem creating groups in individual chats."

"Firestore needs improvements in its querying capabilities, particularly the ability to join tables and merge data from different tables before sending it to the front end."

"If we use a lot of data, it will eventually cost us a lot."

"For the PubSub feature, we had to create our own tools to monitor the events."

"The tool should improve by increasing its size limits and handling dynamic data better. We use the client ID or associate it with a key for static content. The solution will not be easy for a beginner. Unless you understand SQL data, it will be difficult to understand and use Redis. It also needs to be user-friendly."

"Sometimes, we use Redis as a cluster, and the clusters can sometimes suffer some issues and bring some downtime to your application."

"The initial setup took some time as our technical team needed to familiarize themselves with Redis."

"The only thing is the lack of a GUI application. There was a time when we needed to resolve an issue in production. If we had a GUI, it would have been easier."

"Redis presents a single point of failure and lacks fault tolerance."

"Redis should have an option to operate without Docker on a local PC."

More Redis cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We saw an ROI. It made the processing of our transactions faster."

"The tool is open-source. There are no additional costs."

"Redis is not an overpriced solution."

"Redis is an open-source product."

"Redis is an open-source solution. There are not any hidden fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

University

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Firestore?

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Firestore?

Firebase is our main backend, so for managing authentications, for managing the backend database, and building cloud functions, it is all through Firebase. In the case of Google Cloud Firestore, th...

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud Firestore?

I have experience with Firebase, especially Firebase, then Google Cloud Computing Engine, and then Google Firebase Studio. Google Cloud Firestore is one of the offerings in Firebase, which is basic...

What do you like most about Redis?

Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you u...

What needs improvement with Redis?

The disadvantage of Redis is that it's a little bit hard to have too many clusters or too many nodes and create the clusters. The sync between the nodes is easier to implement with Couchbase, for e...

What is your primary use case for Redis?

Redis is used for a part of a booking engine for travel, specifically for the front part to get some sessions and information about the sessions. If a customer or user is using the sites in differe...

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud Firestore

Comparisons

Compared 28% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 12% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Firestore

Compared 11% of the time

More Google Cloud Firestore Competitors

Upstash vs Redis

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Coherence vs Redis

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Data Grid vs Redis

Compared 6% of the time

Chroma vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

Hazelcast Platform vs Redis

Compared 5% of the time

More Redis Competitors

Product Reports

Download Google Cloud Firestore product report

NoSQL Databases

February 2026

Download Redis product report

January 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Redis Enterprise

Overview

Google Cloud Firestore is a scalable, real-time NoSQL cloud database that provides document-oriented data storage and synchronizes data seamlessly across devices.

Designed for mobile, web, and server development, Firestore allows developers to store and sync data quickly. It supports real-time updates which enable your applications to reflect changes instantly. Firestore is based on a managed infrastructure, relieving developers from server-side maintenance and scalability concerns. It integrates with other Google Cloud services making it a convenient choice for modern app development.

What are the key features?

Real-Time Updates: Firestore automatically synchronizes data across all connected clients in real-time.
Scaling: Dynamically scales to accommodate growing data and user demands.
Offline Persistence: Stores data locally so that applications remain usable in offline mode.
Database Queries: Supports sophisticated queries to filter and retrieve data efficiently.
Security: Provides robust rules-based security for data control.

What benefits and ROI considerations should users review?

Improved Development Speed: Simplifies syncing and storing data, saving development time.
Cost-Effective: Pay-as-you-go pricing model ensures costs align with usage.
Efficiency: Reduced need for backend development enhances productivity.
Reliability: Rest assured with dependable infrastructure that ensures availability.

Firestore is widely used in industries like retail, where apps require real-time inventory tracking and customer insights. In health tech, it's utilized for patient data management, ensuring real-time updates across platforms while adhering to security protocols. Educational tech companies implement the database to provide an interactive learning experience with live collaboration features.

Google

Redis offers high-speed, in-memory storage, renowned for real-time performance. It supports quick data retrieval and is used commonly in applications like analytics and gaming.

Renowned for real-time performance, Redis delivers high-speed in-memory storage, making it a favorite for applications needing quick data retrieval. Its diverse data structures and caching capabilities support a broad array of use cases, including analytics and gaming. Redis ensures robust scalability with master-slave replication and clustering, while its publish/subscribe pattern renders it reliable for event-driven applications. The solution integrates smoothly with existing systems, minimizing performance tuning needs. Although documentation on scalability and security could be improved, Redis remains cost-effective and stable, commonly utilized in cloud environments. Enhancing integration with cloud services like AWS and Google Cloud and refining GUI may improve usability.

What are the key features of Redis?

High Speed: In-memory data storage for swift access.
Scalability: Master-slave replication and clustering for growth.
Data Structures: Supports diverse types for varied uses.
Persistence: RDB snapshots and AOF logs ensure durability.
Integration: Seamless integration reduces tuning efforts.

What should users look for in Redis reviews?

Performance: Real-time data retrieval boosts efficiency.
Cost-Effectiveness: Stable, budget-friendly implementation.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse environments and platforms.
Reliability: Ensures data persistence and high availability.

Redis finds application across industries for tasks like caching to improve application performance and speed, minimizing database load. It enables real-time processing for session storage, push notifications, and analytics. As a messaging platform, Redis handles high traffic and supports replication and clustering for cross-platform scalability.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips