Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Google and NetApp are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while NetApp is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.5. Google holds a 6.9% mindshare in PCSS, compared to NetApp’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Read 11 Google Cloud Storage Nearline reviews

3,204 Views
3,108 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 64 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

9,473 Views
2,747 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage Nearline and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP are prominent cloud storage solutions. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is favored for integration and flexibility, while Google Cloud Storage Nearline wins on cost-efficiency.

Features: Google Cloud Storage Nearline users value its seamless integration with other Google Cloud services, efficient cold storage capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is appreciated for robust data management, advanced features such as snapshots and cloning, and strong integration with various cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage Nearline needs better performance, improved scalability, and enhanced user interface. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP should simplify configuration, improve user documentation, and streamline user onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage Nearline is considered easy to deploy with satisfactory customer service. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers deployment flexibility but may require more initial configuration and has mixed reviews regarding customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage Nearline is recognized for cost-effectiveness and competitive pricing. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, while potentially higher in cost, provides strong ROI due to its comprehensive features and robust performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (3rd), Cloud Storage (9th), Cloud Backup (27th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is 6.9%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 6.2%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud Storage Nearline	6.9%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	6.2%
Other	86.9%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

reviewer2662839

Works

Seamless integration with cloud services improves workflows but documentation needs enhancement

One area that needs improvement is the documentation, which I find to be disorganized and not user-friendly. The lack of comprehensive walkthrough guides for specific use cases makes it difficult to follow. To enhance the experience, more detailed examples, guides, and tutorials from start to finish would be beneficial. Additionally, the cost compared to other providers like Amazon could be regarded as a downside.

Read full review

reviewer5948293

Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers performance control and cloud integration while supporting data management with granular flexibility

The scalability of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is interesting. We have thought about it, but we haven't used it. I think the scalability is something you scale up rather than respond to peak demand. It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios. We like the scalability; it's enough for what we're planning to use, but we haven't used any advanced features. The standard platform is NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which is their cloud service. In fact, that's probably the most experience I have with NetApp. I've experienced it on-premise, but kind of secondhand.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is its integration with the wider Google Cloud ecosystem."

"The best part of Nearline storage is the ability to take backups at optimal costs and its availability across multiple regions."

"I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution."

"We didn't face any downtime last year using the solution."

"Nearline is highly stable."

"Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month."

"The stability is excellent; I can't think of a better service that's provided in South America, and the infrastructure overall is very stable and reliable."

"It can isolate files and stop them from corrupting other files."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline pros

"CVO provides all the functionality any customer would need on cloud; it's a single solution that covers everything."

"One thing I have noticed is that it is very simple to move the data where we need to move it, delete it, or archive it if we need to archive it to StorageGRID."

"For the price, the quality of the hardware, the quality of the support, the features it offers, I'm thrilled with NetApp."

"The initial setup was straightforward. We started with a small pilot and we then moved to production with no downtime at all."

"This solution has helped us because it is easy to use."

"Snapshot copies and thin clones have made our recovery time a lot faster."

"It is a good system; it is very stable as far as what I've been using with it, and I find that support from it is really good as well."

"It gives a solution for storage one place to go across everything. So, the customer is very familiar with NetApp on-prem. It allows them to gain access to the file piece. It helps them with the training aspect of it, so they don't have to relearn something new. They already know this product. They just have to learn some widgets or what it's like in the cloud to operate and deploy it in different ways."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"From a storage standpoint, it would be beneficial if the retrieval cost could be optimized, as it is comparatively higher than storage costs in Nearline."

"Nearline security could be better. The solution could integrate better with SEIM tools."

"The suggestion for improvement primarily revolves around cost efficiency."

"One area that needs improvement is the documentation, which I find to be disorganized and not user-friendly."

"The solution needs to offer better System Information and Event Management (SEIM). I'd like to discover how we could implement something like that within Google's cloud."

"The pricing is quite high."

"They should provide more options or flexibility in terms of pricing."

"The pricing could be improved. It's completely non-competitive at this time."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline cons

"One difficulty is that it has no SAP HANA certification. The asset performance restrictions create challenges with the infrastructure underneath: The disks and stuff like that often have lower latencies than SAP HANA itself has to have."

"NetApp's support could improve"

"We have had issues with everything failing back 100 percent correctly."

"The automated deployment was a bit complex using the public APIs. When we had to deploy Cloud Volumes ONTAP on a regular basis using automation, It could be a bit of a challenge."

"I would want more visibility and data analytics where we can see anomalies within the shares within the GUI."

"I would like to see more information about Cloud Volumes ONTAP using Google Cloud Platform on NetApp's website."

"The product is more restricted with underlying cloud."

"I would like to see more aggressive management of the aggregate space. On the Cloud Volumes ONTAP that we use for offsite backup copies, most of the data sits in S3. There are also the EBS volumes on the Cloud Volumes ONTAP itself. Sometimes what happens is that the aggregate size just stays the same. If it allocates 8 terabytes initially, it just stays at 8 terabytes for a long time, even though we're only using 20 percent of that 8 terabytes. NetApp could undersize that more aggressively."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Google Cloud Storage Nearline is very inexpensive. It costs us less than $50 a month to store our files. We use approximately 10 terabytes. Overall, I would rate the product a five out of five for affordability."

"Right now, for the number of servers and the storage that I have, I would say I'm charged between $125 and $150 per month."

"Our licensing is based on a yearly subscription. That is an additional cost, but because of the storage efficiencies that the NetApp gives, even with the additional cost of the NetApp license, you still end up saving money versus straight Azure native for storage. It's definitely worth it."

"Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs."

"Some flexibility around the licensing model would help. The product is licensed based on capacity. Basically, the largest capacity license that you can buy is 368 terabytes. At this point, NetApp is addressing some people's concerns around this."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."

"It is not a cheap solution because we need to pay for the license and pay for Azure resources as well."

"The cost is quite high."

"I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs."

"They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

University

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

My experience with the licensing and cost of Google Cloud Storage Nearline has been positive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

Documentation is an area for improvement in Google Cloud Storage Nearline. Documentation might cause some issues during deployment in future updates of Google Cloud Storage Nearline. Other than tha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Storage Nearline?

I have integrated Google Cloud Storage Nearline with BigQuery for analytics.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

I use NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP mostly in customer companies.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 62% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Competitors

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage Nearline

August 2026

Download Google Cloud Storage Nearline product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

July 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

No data available

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Overview

Google Cloud Storage Nearline offers cost-effective storage for infrequently accessed data, providing seamless integration with Google Cloud services and flexible retrieval options.

Google Cloud Storage Nearline is designed for businesses that need reliable and secure storage for data that is not frequently accessed but still requires long-term retention. It integrates seamlessly with Google's suite of cloud services, providing adaptable storage solutions that handle data flow efficiently. Nearline ensures high availability and stable performance, backed by strong encryption for security. It supports diverse storage class options catering to different data retention needs and capabilities for data management across multiple regions. Its value is enhanced by robust monitoring and integration with Google Cloud's ecosystem.

What are the most important features?

Seamless API Integration: Integrates easily with existing workflows.
Excellent Security: Offers strong encryption to protect data.
Ease of Use: Provides an intuitive interface for managing storage.
Stable Performance: Ensures reliable access to stored data.
High Availability: Guarantees access to data whenever needed.
Data Longevity Options: Offers different classes for data retention.
Multi-Region Management: Manages data across regions seamlessly.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Offers a budget-friendly solution for data storage.
Flexibility: Adapts to fluctuating data storage and retrieval needs.
Integration: Works well with Google Cloud services for enhanced functionality.
Efficient Accessibility: Facilitates easy data access when required.
Enhanced Monitoring: Provides robust tools for tracking data usage.

Industries like tech and finance utilize Google Cloud Storage Nearline for storing large volumes of infrequently accessed data, leveraging its seamless integration with databases, infrastructure, and virtual machines. It is ideal for backup storage, application, and website data, and unstructured data handling. Companies use Nearline in cloud functions and for cost-effective performance optimization integrated with BigQuery analytics.

Google

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

June 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.