SAP S4HANA on AWS and Google Cloud compete in cloud-based enterprise solutions. SAP S4HANA on AWS seems to have the upper hand in enterprise resource planning due to its robust integration and performance benefits, while Google Cloud is praised for usability and flexible pricing.
Features: SAP S4HANA on AWS distinguishes itself with financial capabilities and process automation, using the HANA database for enhanced speed and efficiency. It offers AI and machine learning capabilities and provides comprehensive module coverage. Google Cloud is known for its ease of use, flexible hosting, and scalability, offering managed services that simplify infrastructure management with a familiar interface.
Room for Improvement: SAP S4HANA on AWS is complex and resource-intensive, with high on-premises hardware costs and integration difficulties. Enhanced technical support and pricing transparency are sought by users. Google Cloud could improve analytics capabilities, multilingual support, and offer more intuitive training resources and smoother integration with external devices.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP S4HANA on AWS offers deployment across various environments but faces slow support response times. Google Cloud is mainly used in public cloud deployments with a straightforward implementation process. While its support is effective, improvements in technical documentation and response clarity would be beneficial.
Pricing and ROI: SAP S4HANA on AWS requires strategic financial planning due to high licensing and hardware costs but delivers robust ROI through operational efficiencies. Google Cloud is recognized for competitive, scalable pricing, appealing to small and medium businesses with flexible pay-as-you-go models, though clearer pricing transparency is desirable.
On a very good implementation, usually, if the scale of the business is large, the implementation can give a payback within six, seven, or eight months of implementation.
Although our investment was higher compared to the previous ERP system, we are able to derive ROI from SAP S4HANA on AWS.
I consider them good partners when it comes to support.
We have consulted Google support several times, and we received a quick response.
Google's technical support is highly expert and proficient.
They have a support model available, with first-level support handling initial issues when I integrate the system.
We received the right support during our implementation and continue to benefit from it.
If I had to rate scalability from one to ten, I would rate it a nine as we have never faced any issues with scalability.
Google Cloud is highly scalable, and we have not faced any issues with its scalability.
This solution is suitable for enterprise-level organizations, particularly in finance and healthcare domains where there is substantial data volume.
AWS has been running probably 96% of Fortune 500 companies across the globe, so scalability is not an issue.
The product is versatile and can manage complexity beyond expectations.
For scalability and the ability to expand, I would also rate it an eight.
As a finance controller, we have seen improvements in finance deliverables, SLAs in payables, and reconciliation timelines.
I would rate the stability of SAP S4HANA on AWS an eight out of ten.
If the hierarchy or similarities were the same, that would help developers more conveniently migrate from a traditional SQL server to BigQuery.
Providing more hypervisors would be beneficial.
The logging could be improved; there's currently no intuitive way to filter logs on the Google console, especially for individuals who are not familiar with query languages.
The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training.
SAP introduced flexible workflows, which are even better if I want customized workflows for my documentation within the procurement domain.
Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.
As far as I know, it is a little more expensive compared to other cloud options.
Compared to buying new hardware, Google Cloud offers flexible options for scaling up or down, making it more convenient.
SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation.
The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.
The main issue is the pricing, which is typically too high for small companies.
The most valuable features of Google Cloud for us are the integration with Kubernetes, IAM, Istio integration, and Terraform capabilities.
If customers use different technologies within their environment, GCP cannot offer a full performance analysis covering all the disclosures.
I find Google Cloud to be more manageable and cost-effective compared to other solutions.
The costing and personnel planning integration are among the strongest areas of this solution.
From the finance side, we have enhanced our internal controls and reduced the timeline for closing the month from a year to just two days.
In terms of usage and automation, SAP S4HANA on AWS is very good at automation, where instead of manually punching entry by entry as with Tally, Zoho, or NetSuite, you can do a bulk upload and close it from one GL to another GL entry from one T-code to another T-code.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Cloud | 4.0% |
| SAP S4HANA on AWS | 2.3% |
| Other | 93.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Google Cloud offers a comprehensive platform renowned for cost-effectiveness, scalability, robust security, and seamless integration with tools such as Kubernetes, making it suitable for various business functions.
Google Cloud stands out for its ease of setup, stable infrastructure, and user-friendly interface. It provides essential features for AI, data analytics, and reliable storage, supporting multi-regional deployments for diverse applications. While maintaining minimal operational costs, it ensures simplified deployment and comprehensive application capabilities. However, improvements are needed in monitoring tools, customer support, documentation, and pricing options. Enhancements in stability, integration, and workload management are also required.
What are the essential features of Google Cloud?Industries leverage Google Cloud for infrastructure management, analytics, application hosting, and development environments. Entities utilize its cloud network, machine learning support, disaster recovery solutions, and big data handling. Many rely on Workspace tools for communication and virtual machine applications for efficient IT infrastructure deployment.
SAP S4HANA on AWS integrates seamlessly for users, offering robust real-time analytics and AI features. It excels in performance, security, and scalability with AWS, optimizing infrastructure costs and enhancing complex business functions.
SAP S4HANA on AWS is valued for its automation and integration across devices with Fiori, providing users with a strong database, real-time analytics, and AI enablement. It offers high performance, security, and scalability, making it suitable for complex business processes in finance, manufacturing, and data management. Users benefit from predictive analysis and advanced analytics, ensuring stability and efficiency for business operations on AWS's robust cloud infrastructure.
What are the key features of SAP S4HANA on AWS?SAP S4HANA on AWS supports diverse industries such as finance, procurement, sales, and HR. Enterprises leverage its comprehensive ERP functionalities for real-time data management and streamlined processes. AWS's strong cloud infrastructure makes it ideal for large-scale operations, enabling integration and flexibility for technical adaptability across business processes.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
