Google Kubernetes Engine vs HPE Ezmeral Container Platform comparison

"The initial setup was very easy because it's like a Google platform as a service. It's just one button to set it up. The deployment took only a few minutes."

"The most beneficial feature is the ability to separate each project and manage permissions more effectively."

"The most valuable aspect of Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is its managed nature, which significantly reduces the burden on our platform team."

"The initial setup process is simpler and more user-friendly than other cloud providers."

"Stability-wise, this solution is really good."

"The solution is available across AWS, GCP and Azure and is seamless."

"I rate Google Kubernetes Engine a ten out of ten."

"I highly recommend it to others due to its comprehensive features and cost-effectiveness for various company sizes."

"The stability of the HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is good, and I rate it an eight out of ten."

"If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."

"One of the things I missed a bit is the visibility and availability of solutions. If I compare it to a different solution, it is a bit behind."

"t is not very stable."

"There are some security issues, but it might just be because we are not up to speed yet as much as we should be and so we haven't found it in the documentation yet. That's why I don't want to confuse this. Still, it could be a little bit easier to understand and implement."

"The management UI could be improved. When looking at the web interface, it feels kind of slow due to the many features involved."

"The management UI could be improved."

"Log observability could be made easier so someone from high school can use it without having technological expertise."

"Our critique is that we have to do too much work to get the cluster production-ready."

"The product's integration with third-party vendors needs improvement."

"HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is not user-friendly and has many parts that are more difficult than Cloudera. It is also a complex solution and has low features for data management."

"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."

"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price. The product is competitively priced."

"This is an open source solution, so there is no pricing or licensing."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"Pricing is a bit expensive compared to some other products, but it's acceptable."

"The price for Google Kubernetes Engine could be lower - I'd rate its pricing at three out of five."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"I would rate Kubernetes' pricing four out of five."

"The pricing for GKE is dependent on the type of machine or virtual machine (VM) that is selected for the nodes in the cluster. There is a degree of flexibility in choosing the specifications of the machine, such as the number of CPUs, GPUs, and so on. Google provides a variety of options, allowing the user to create the desired cluster composition. However, the cost can be quite steep when it comes to regional clusters, which are necessary for high availability and failover. This redundancy is crucial for businesses and is required to handle an increase in requests in case of any issues in one region, such as jumping to a different region in case of a failure in the Toronto region. While it may be tempting to choose the cheapest type of machines, this may result in a limited capacity and user numbers, requiring over-provisioning to handle additional requests, such as those for a web application."