GroundWork Monitor vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications comparison

GroundWork and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. GroundWork is ranked #49, while Broadcom is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.8. GroundWork holds a 0.8% mindshare in CMS, compared to Broadcom’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GroundWork users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

GroundWork Monitor

Read 1 GroundWork Monitor review

1,769 Views
831 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Read 14 VMware Aria Operations for Applications reviews

6,376 Views
2,805 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GroundWork Monitor

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GroundWork Monitor and VMware Aria Operations for Applications based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Zabbix, New Relic and others in Cloud Monitoring Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Monitoring Software Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Monitoring Software

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,495 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GroundWork Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

76th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

49th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (101st), IT Operations Analytics (22nd)

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

17th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (16th), Container Monitoring (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of GroundWork Monitor is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Aria Operations for Applications	2.2%
GroundWork Monitor	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

it_user186582

Sr PC/Client Server Analyst II at a individual & family service with 10,001+ employees

It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write. When we need to, the threshold is easy to change.

It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write. When we need to, the threshold is easy to change It would be nice to have a centralized client-settings management. At the moment, the client settings have to be changed individually. I've used it since 2011. The deployment of the new server…

Read full review

Ajay Shukla

Consultant at HCLTech

Automation and insightful diagnostics elevate operations while improvements are welcome

The new version 8.18 has brought significant improvements. The main purpose of using this tool is having a single console to manage all entities. The cloud integration capabilities, including private, public, and hybrid, are already well-implemented. The ability to manage multiple vCenters across different geographical locations is very effective. The new Skyline health feature and certificate and licensing management are particularly useful improvements. The dashboard's overview tab provides comprehensive information about current vCenter status, resizable amounts, reclamation opportunities, anomalies, diagnostics, licensing, and certificates. However, there is room for improvement in application analysis. The current functionality lacks detailed monitoring at the kernel level, focusing mainly on CPU, memory, and storage matrices. Enhanced application monitoring capabilities, including tracking downtime for specific types of applications such as transactional or e-commerce applications, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to setup and the plugins are easy to write."

"The solution is great for virtualization and preparing the infrastructure in Tanzu to test products. It's very fast and has good visibility."

"The stability of Aria Operations for Applications has improved significantly over the years."

"I find VMware Aria Operations for Applications to be very stable, and I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"Scalability for VMware Aria Operations for Applications is easy to implement and manage."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation."

"VMware comes with a support team, and if you have trouble, you can easily create a ticket, and VMware will help you. Therefore, the best aspect is the support."

"VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers significant features such as real-time statistics, the ability to identify possible issues within the VM environment, and helpful heat maps."

"For us, the ease of deployment in combination with TMZ was the most important part because we don't have to manually deploy a complex monitoring solution. We can more or less do that with the click of a button, and we are not dependent on the developers to provide us with all the necessary features and functions to make that work. We can just deploy it on a workload cluster and monitor at least a good part of the workload. If we want to go into detail, we clearly need to make changes, but for a good part of application monitoring, it gives us good insights."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications pros

Cons

"Deploying an agent leaves much to be desired."

"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack."

"The initial setup should be easier and more seamless."

"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us."

"The main problem I have is that the license cost is very high."

"They just need more capability. A few areas still need more enhancements in the technology capability space."

"In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get."

"Its billing model is consumption-based. I understand the consumption-based model, but it is not necessarily easy to estimate and guess how many points or how much we are going to consume on a specific application up until we get to that point. So, for us, it would be helpful to have more insights or predictability into what we can expect from a cost perspective if we are starting to use specific features. This can potentially also drive our consumption a bit more."

"It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing costs are very high, particularly when you consider that we have to purchase a level 1 license for every integration, such as the load balancer, HAProxy, and the MSSP. And if you want to use vSAN, that's another license. Then, of course, Tanzu Observability has its own separate license."

"I would rate the pricing as three out of five."

"Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

"I don't have the details. In our case, there is a mixture in place. We have production usage, and we are also doing training for VMware. So, we also have a training instance. It is worth the money you would spend on it. That's because if you were to build all of this yourself by using some of the open source tools, then you would need a lot of time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

The solution includes cost drivers that can be configured according to your environment. You can input server-wise, CPU-wise, storage, and memory costs per hour or day. Once cost drivers are provid...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

I have been involved in several projects where I had to implement automation and monitoring alerting. I performed automation using VMware Aria Operations for Applications. There is an automation ta...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 16% of the time

Zabbix vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs GroundWork Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More GroundWork Monitor Competitors

Datadog vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 6% of the time

LogicMonitor vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

June 2026

Download GroundWork Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

June 2026

VMware Aria Operations for Applications report

Download VMware Aria Operations for Applications product report

Also Known As

GWOS

Tanzu Observability, Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability

Overview

GroundWork Monitor streamlines IT infrastructure management with its comprehensive monitoring tools, enhancing efficiency and ensuring system reliability. Designed for professionals, it offers robust insights and simplifies complex environments.

GroundWork Monitor offers a flexible, scalable solution adept at monitoring hybrid IT environments. It effectively combines performance tracking, availability data, and comprehensive reporting to address intricate network infrastructures. Its integration capabilities support seamless operation with existing systems, contributing to optimized IT performance.

What are the key features of GroundWork Monitor?

Hybrid Monitoring: Supports both physical and virtual environments for comprehensive oversight.
Integration: Easily integrates with existing IT systems, supporting diverse technology stacks.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides customizable visuals for a personalized monitoring experience.
Advanced Analytics: Offers deep insights with detailed analytics and reporting functionality.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines IT operations, leading to enhanced productivity.
Cost Reduction: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring.
Scalability: Supports organizational growth with flexible scaling options.
Enhanced Reliability: Minimizes operational risks by providing reliable infrastructure insights.

GroundWork Monitor is utilized across industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, where it supports critical operations through continuous monitoring. Its ability to adapt to sector-specific requirements makes it suitable for managing complex IT landscapes in specialized fields.

GroundWork

VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is a powerful tool for monitoring and analyzing the performance and availability of applications and infrastructure in real-time.

With its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, visualizing and analyzing data becomes effortless. The real-time alerting system ensures timely issue resolution, while scalability and a user-friendly interface provide a seamless experience for smooth operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Swiss Life, JBFCS, Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Databricks 4. DigitalOcean 5. Equinix 6. Fidelity Investments 7. Google 8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 9. Honeywell 10. IBM 11. Intel 12. JetBlue Airways 13. LinkedIn 14. Lyft 15. Mastercard 16. Microsoft 17. MongoDB 18. Netflix 19. Nvidia 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Pinterest 23. Qualcomm 24. Red Hat 25. Salesforce 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Square 29. TMobile 30. Twitter 31. Uber 32. VMware

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Monitoring Software

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Zabbix, New Relic and others in Cloud Monitoring Software. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.