HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs HPE EVA [EOL] comparison

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE EVA [EOL] are both solutions in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category. Additionally, 94% of HPE 3PAR StoreServ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 60% of HPE EVA [EOL] users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

12,432 Views
2,984 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

HPE EVA [EOL]

Read 4 HPE EVA [EOL] reviews

60% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

HPE EVA [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 28, 2025

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE EVA compete in enterprise storage solutions. HPE 3PAR StoreServ is favored for its advanced technology and scalability.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers dynamic tiering, thin provisioning, and a robust management console, providing efficiency and agility. HPE EVA is known for simpler architecture and high availability.

Room for Improvement: HPE 3PAR could improve ease of learning and some interface aspects. Users noted the need for more streamlined migrations. Cost could be lowered further. HPE EVA faced limitations in scalability, was less upgradable, and lacked modern features like advanced tiering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is recognized for its refined deployment process and comprehensive support services. HPE EVA was known for a quicker setup but is discontinued, leading to reduced support availability.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ's advanced hardware results in a higher initial setup cost but offers better ROI through long-term savings. HPE EVA had lower upfront costs, yet its discontinuation may lead to higher expenses and diminished ROI due to lack of updates and support.

To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

NAS (8th), Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (11th)

HPE EVA [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Cyril Omatsola

Information Systems & Security Administrator at a government with 501-1,000 employees

Ease of use in data center boosts resilience and infrastructure efficiency

I find the HPE 3PAR StoreServ valuable for its ease of use and resilience, which is beneficial. The main benefits I have seen from having HPE 3PAR StoreServ include its use at a small branch I managed for about three years with around 60 users. It operates effectively because it is an HPE product we use there. I have not experienced any significant issues besides occasional IT-related ones, such as local database problems. Since handing over the administration of the system to someone else and moving to another department, there have not been any issues. There are many features that exist but I haven't needed to try. Before moving out of that role in my organization, I knew it was a product I enjoyed working with for infrastructure purposes. After completing my new role, I intend to return to infrastructure.

Read full review

reviewer2268315

Deputy General Manager & Enterprise Head at a security firm with 501-1,000 employees

Has the ability to automatically deal with faulty disks

In terms of the most beneficial features of the product, I would say that during the faulty disk replacement process, the tool automatically ungroups the faulty disk, so from the tool itself, anybody can identify which disk is faulty and then repair it. The data replication part is not enabled in the product that I use since the DRP feature is not enabled. I work with the product's high availability feature. Considering the size of the environment where the product is used, the product offers around 80 to 90 TB of storage space. I won't recommend the product to others who plan to use it. The implementation process of the product would be as per the standard of the organization where it is going to be used. Everyone should have their own organizational data structure as per the data orientation needs. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can deploy new servers and new solutions pretty quickly."

"I have a lot of applications that need higher IOPS, and 3PAR achieves this operation normally without any issues for the management."

"If there is a problem then the HPE facility will detect it and immediately contact me."

"3PAR's ease-of-use has really improved our functioning because it requires less administration and less tuning."

"The performance compared to other products, and over time having the product and using it for six years, has been tremendous and brought about positive things."

"The speed is very good."

"The main features are good pricing, very good options, and ease of use."

"This is a good, stable product, and management is pretty straightforward."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"We cannot stop this SAN array; it has never failed since it was started, and we have not had a problem with it at all."

"HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement."

"The solution's most valuable feature is storage provisioning, which allows me to easily provision the disk space on the servers."

"It's fast, reliable, and it's very good for the price."

"There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years."

"My most important criteria when selecting a vendor are price, dedupe, and compression."

"It is very stable."

Cons

"The thing that we're a little bit bummed about is they're not so quick to get it with the latest version of VMware and we're also using an older version of OneView; so to get to the newer/later releases, it seems like it's a two week process for two different data centers."

"It increased performance for a while, but then, as we grew, and we did not grow significantly, performance dropped down."

"3PAR has StoreOnce and replication. I would like it if they worked together. Or, if I had Nimble and put that either in DR or a primary cohesive management, but still use the cool features of 3PAR, that would be awesome."

"This product has come to the end of its lifecycle."

"We've started to see an issue with the older models that we have. We've had issues where facilities would have unscheduled power outages or scheduled power outages and the 3PARs weren't able to come up successfully."

"There is a slight difference between what we expected and what was delivered."

"The main problem for 3PAR right now is cost."

"I would like to see a little better integration with OneView and provisioning ESX Hosts."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."

"In general, my boss feels that HPE's prices are very high."

"It could be just this particular model, but the storage is not so stable."

"I faced some issues during the disk replacement process in HPE EVA."

"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit more expensive. IBM is cheaper than HPE in Turkey."

"Its price is a bit high for adding another tree, but when we purchased it, it was okay with us. We had compared it with EMC and other solutions, and it was okay at that point in time. Our storage has a lifespan of seven to eight years. When you purchase it, you need to keep a headroom of around 40% to 50%. After three to four years, you generally plan for an upgrade. The price is not so bad today for two years or so, and within a year, I might find that I have to upgrade or increase the storage. This usually happens when there is a radical change or a new application has come that is consuming a lot of data, but generally, there is a plan for the amount of data that we generate and the storage upgrade."

"Since the prices of the flash storage has gone down tremendously, I would definitely recommend going for the all-flash storage array or 3PAR. It is a big expensive even now, but it will be the future of all industries."

"The support for the solution is free for three years, then it is an additional cost. It is approximately $30,000 annually. The price includes a lot of equipment we have not only HPE 3PAR StoreServ."

"This is not an expensive product but every time you add capacity to it, you need to pay for re-balancing."

"They have added features, such as the compression and duplication, which have further increased our ROI."

"We purchased the total package for approximately $60,000."

"This solution is expensive. We pay every year for support. It's a lump sum because we pay for data center support services, and everything is included in one."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE EVA?

I use the solution for almost 36 servers since it has a huge storage capacity. In HPE EVA, my company has created two pools of different capacities in terms of disk sizes. In the different pools, m...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE EVA?

The solution's most valuable feature is storage provisioning, which allows me to easily provision the disk space on the servers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE EVA?

I don't want to make many improvements to the product because it is an entry-level storage product. There are a lot of storage products available on the market, such as Nimble Flash Array Storage. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Primera vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

HPE MSA vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

HPE MSA vs HPE EVA [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Dell Connectrix vs HPE EVA [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Dell PowerVault vs HPE EVA [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE EVA [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

More HPE EVA [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

May 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

April 2026

Download HPE EVA [EOL] product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

EVA P6000 series, HP EVA

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Lean IT budgets require more efficient ways of managing data. Driving business growth and agility requires simple yet flexible storage that reduces costs while maintaining application availability. With an installed base of over 100,000, mid-sized organizations count on HP EVA Storage. This fifth-generation, virtualized storage array provides availability while increasing productivity and capacity utilization.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

Bank Simpanan Nasional, EDF, Saint Mary's University, Thomson Reuters

Buyer's Guide

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.