No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise SAN (3rd)
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
26th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (36th), Cloud Storage (36th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 is 3.2%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is 1.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
HPE Alletra Storage MP B100003.2%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS1.3%
Other95.5%
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1309695 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure And Systems Manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
High‑availability block storage has protected critical research workloads and boosted VMware IOPS
It is difficult to provide specific areas for improvement at this time. We may realize approximately 20% gains in the future, but the previous SAN we used was not very time-consuming, so the improvement is not very significant. We anticipate gains of approximately 10 to 20%. The management interface could be simplified. The cloud console contains two main sections: one for hardware and one for logical volumes on the LUNs being managed. This split is understandable because the hardware console contains HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 for block storage and HPE Alletra for backup, both accessible in the same console. The separation of the SAN hardware console and the backup console is logical and understandable. We have four compute nodes, and the system was not designed to shut down gracefully with only two compute nodes remaining. Running with just one compute node functions properly, and the system continues to operate at reduced capacity. However, when we experienced a crash involving half of the system, HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 failed completely. This behavior is documented as normal in the documentation, but we hoped the block storage could manage to run with half the power. This capability will be available in a future release but is not included in the current version. Our testing before moving to production was not entirely successful, but this aligns with the documented specifications. When we perform failover and data center crash tests, the system performs very well. We have deliberately crashed all four compute nodes, and the secondary storage site manages the workload without any virtual machines malfunctioning. This level of reliability is excellent, and it demonstrates why we selected HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000. Improvements in this area would make the solution even stronger.
reviewer2039379 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at a university with 10,001+ employees
Great migrations, useful integrations, and offers good data replication
The local libraries from NetApp to NetApp are good. This way, we don't have to put the middleman in between to do the transition or conversion. The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful. In terms of the integration with AWS native services, I did not configure it by myself. There was another team who did it. That said, I presume they didn't run into any issues, which is why we are using it. While the solution did not help us reduce the amount of storage, it allowed us to have data replicated across on-premises and in the cloud, so that we have a backup in DR. While it did not reduce the footprint, it helped DR expansion. It increased redundancy. Since deploying the product, we have not been affected by ransomware or other external threats.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The features of HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 that I appreciate the most include the high RAM, which allows us to extract the data quickly, and the GUI, which is much more intuitive than the competitors."
"The feature I like is that I can create a template and apply it to multiple switches. I don't have to do the same task on every switch, and the same goes for access points. It's central management, with the features that come with central management."
"My customer is very happy about the throughput and IOPS provided by HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000."
"HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 is basically a high throughput, high bandwidth solution that provides millions of IOPS, very low latency, and a guarantee of 100% data availability, allowing me to run multiple VMs on that particular storage without any downtime."
"The features of HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 that I prefer most include its performance, which has benefited my organization by meeting our capacity requirements and enhancing operational efficiency as our data and capacity grow."
"The ability to scale capacity and performance independently has positively impacted my operations regarding performance and capacity."
"HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 reduces the time I spend on storage provisioning and management, saving about 50% of my time because by default I configure the host groups and host volumes, and if I need to add one more storage to the VMware environment, I put it in the group and it automatically presents to all of the hosts."
"HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 enables a line of business or DB admins to self-provision storage."
"The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful."
 

Cons

"I would appreciate improvements in performance monitoring to create custom reports."
"I see some areas that could still be improved."
"When the system first came out, it had some problems with the Data Center Cloud Console, which made implementation difficult."
"If the customer's requirement is pure NAS, in that environment, I cannot suggest HP solutions."
"There are areas for improvement in support, and they still have potential to be better."
"I would like to see HPE GreenLake for File Storage improved in terms of the program's speed, as the administration, creation of change orders, issuance of those orders, and shipping of products take a while."
"The marketplace should improve. There should be a more robust variety of vendors."
"You need two different boxes for block and file storage."
"We'd like the solution to be less expensive and offer lower latency."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
9%
Media Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise17
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake for Block Storage?
Until now, I have not faced any negative issues or disadvantages. I am happy to work with HPE storages. In our environment, we are using many different vendors, but for storage, we are only using H...
What is your primary use case for HPE GreenLake for Block Storage?
I am using HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 mostly for SAP systems. The latency and response time are very good, and the performance of the storage is excellent. I am very satisfied with the performan...
What advice do you have for others considering HPE GreenLake for Block Storage?
An integrator is recommended for implementation. I am not sure whether the storage admin is using certain features or not, as I am not a storage administrator. My overall review rating for HPE Alle...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

HPE GreenLake for Block Storage
Cloud Volumes Service for AWS, NetApp CVS for AWS, CVS for AWS
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Nutanix, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: October 2026.
919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.