No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] vs Imperva Application Security Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Cloud CDN [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Imperva Application Securit...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
148
Ranking in other categories
CDN (2nd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (1st), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (3rd), Bot Management (1st), API Security (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user567870 - PeerSpot reviewer
Corporate Account Tech Manager at a tech company with 51-200 employees
It's a converged system resulting in fewer complications
It's a converged system; the storage. SAN switch is not required, that is the advantage of it. The interconnectivity is based on a single system. That is value. It means fewer complications and the cost will be reduced Productivity increases, in terms of speed of the application. And, of course,…
reviewer2818155 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Application protection has improved and reporting and dashboards still need refinement
I believe Imperva Application Security Platform should have a more interactive wizard. While the dashboard is good, it could be more eye-catching. Based on my perspective, I recommend modifying the dashboards, especially the main dashboard where I can see the traffic hit count, alerts, and other latest information. In terms of reporting, I find it challenging to create reports; in my earlier days, it was difficult. Over time, I have learned how to create reports, but it should be easier to do so. I have used other tools such as firewalls or SolarWinds, where creating a report is straightforward and does not take much time, unlike in Imperva, where I have to add many elements. Modifications in the integration aspects would also be beneficial.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Productivity increases, in terms of speed of the application, and of course the price is reduced compared to traditional solutions."
"It speeds up clients' workflow and productivity because deployment is faster, they can test and build applications, build virtual machines, test them, and have them deployed in a much shorter period of time, increasing the efficiency of IT operations and cutting costs because you pay for services only as and when you need them."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"I have had a positive experience with Imperva Web Application Firewall's tech support so far. They are knowledgeable and respond on time."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"Imperva Web Application Firewall is used for customers who are looking to secure their multiple applications and want to block threats such as DDoS and ransomware attacks, delivering data security, data availability, and access control."
"The features that are most valuable are the protection against denial-of-service attacks and all kinds of other internet attacks."
"For me, it is the best solution available."
"I suggest others looking into using Imperva Application Security Platform consider it as the best solution."
"Its inline transferring mode is the most valuable because it is 100% transparent. When you change the IP, there is no change on the network side. If you can't and want to try to reach an IP, you can reach the server IP. There are many other advanced security features in it. The smallest appliances of Imperva can handle the highest traffic at a customer site. For example, a smaller appliance from Imperva can provide you the same security as an F5 product."
 

Cons

"Extend the storage capacity. I think it's capable of only going up to 13TB, but sometimes customers require 30TB of storage."
"The weakest point of Imperva is their first level of support, which should be improved."
"The tool needs to improve CPU and storage memory."
"HTML minification could be improved. The actual HTML minification does not provide the maximum HTML minification nor provides the best result."
"There are times that we experienced downtime or crashes with Imperva Application Security Platform; there were times that it crashed, it did not load, and we had to wait until it was fine."
"There's always room for improvement. Occasionally, there might be false-positive alerts."
"The API is lackluster but especially for customers."
"The signature updates could be faster. Sometimes we have to upload signatures to the Imperva portal for checking and analysis before we can use them."
"They can provide an option to create reports, automatically import the entire report, and create rules again. In a real-life crisis, it would be helpful to be able to import a report and generate security rules from that report. I should be able to create a simple query and import the reports automatically. It can maybe also tell us the format of the report."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Imperva Web Application Firewall is expensive."
"​Although the pricing can be a little high, it is worth the protection and security that it offers.​"
"The price of Imperva Web Application Firewalls is expensive compared to others."
"The price is high compared to other solutions like FortiWeb."
"Imperva Web Application Firewall's pricing is expensive."
"Imperva’s pricing is a bit higher in the market since it offers a full-blown WAF."
"The price of this solution is a little bit high compared to competitors."
"There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features. Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CDN solutions are best for your needs.
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business88
Midsize Enterprise25
Large Enterprise71
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva DDoS?
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Imperva DDoS are reasonable for the amount of technical capabilities provided. I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap a...
What needs improvement with Imperva DDoS?
I would like to see improvements in the pooling of threats and attacks, possibly to enlarge the scale of indicators of compromise. For example, the initiation of an attack on the endpoint level cou...
 

Also Known As

HP Cloud CDN
Imperva Bot Management, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Imperva API Security
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Comline, NNIT
Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Imperva, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in CDN. Updated: October 2026.
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.