HPE Intelligent Management Center vs IBM Tivoli NetCool comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Network Management Applications category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.7. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.6% mindshare in NMA, compared to IBM’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE Intelligent Management ...

Read 7 HPE Intelligent Management Center reviews

1,148 Views
1,068 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli NetCool

Read 13 IBM Tivoli NetCool reviews

1,022 Views
797 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

HPE Intelligent Management ...

IBM Tivoli NetCool

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

IBM Tivoli NetCool and HPE Intelligent Management Center are competitive products in network management and monitoring. IBM Tivoli NetCool appears to have an advantage in terms of flexibility and customization options, but HPE Intelligent Management Center shows strength in integration capabilities, making it a comprehensive solution for organizations seeking robust performance monitoring.

Features: IBM Tivoli NetCool provides advanced event management and correlation features, allowing for detailed monitoring and real-time problem detection. Its adaptability for complex IT environments stands out. HPE Intelligent Management Center offers a unified platform with extensive network management capabilities and ease of integration with various network devices to enhance operational efficiency. The primary difference lies in IBM's focus on event management, while HPE emphasizes comprehensive network oversight.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli NetCool could enhance user interface intuitiveness, streamline integration with emerging technologies, and improve deployment processes. HPE Intelligent Management Center might benefit from expanding cross-vendor equipment support, increasing scalability for larger networks, and reducing setup complexities in multi-vendor environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli NetCool's deployment requires a tailored approach depending on the IT ecosystem, supported by strong technical customer service. HPE Intelligent Management Center benefits from a more straightforward and scalable deployment process that aligns well with diverse infrastructures while offering accessible customer support. The main distinction is IBM's need for personalized deployments versus HPE's streamlined approach.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli NetCool involves a higher setup cost due to its customizability, providing significant ROI for businesses needing detailed network insights. Conversely, HPE Intelligent Management Center offers a more cost-effective setup with a rapid return on investment, appealing to organizations prioritizing budget-friendly solutions. The difference highlights IBM's higher initial investment for extensive features against HPE's affordability and quick ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Intelligent Management ...

Ranking in Network Management Applications

8th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Tivoli NetCool

Ranking in Network Management Applications

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of HPE Intelligent Management Center is 4.6%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Management Applications Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Intelligent Management Center	4.6%
IBM Tivoli NetCool	2.7%
Other	92.7%

Network Management Applications

Featured Reviews

Muhammad_Faisal

Manager ITSM at Lucky Cement Limited

Achieve seamless network and link monitoring with comprehensive device management

The most valuable function is that the IMC takes an entire backup of my network devices, and I can also redeploy them. The really beneficial feature is the link monitoring. I had checked Check Point's product, however, my requirements are better fulfilled by IMC. The main feature is that IMC automatically configures the device for my use. I have over 200 features in my network, and IMC manages the complete environment. Automation is good, but I mainly use it for monitoring. I am too satisfied with this product.

Read full review

Petar Ganev

Senior Enterprise Monitoring Engineer at Commerzbank

Reliable for enterprise monitoring but no longer actively developed

There are problems with the latest security requirements because many things have changed in recent years, and now the security audits are very strict. And we need to switch to something else. We need to patch it constantly. Moreover, it is a very old tool and a little bit difficult to support. Otherwise, they work okay.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable function is that the IMC takes an entire backup of my network devices, and I can also redeploy them."

"The most useful feature is infrastructure monitoring including switches and servers."

"The most valuable feature is the interface and its ease of use."

"It's a very complete product with a lot of functionality."

"One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations."

"Tivoli NetCool allows us to grasp a lot of data that can be applied toward predictive analytics and auto-remediation."

"NetCool has a huge database that can collect and process about one million alarms a day."

"It's very easy to use."

"The tool is much easier to manage than running scripts and figuring out how many endpoints have been exceeded."

"Anything is possible with Tivoli. It's quite a robust system."

"The tool had many built-in automation capabilities."

"The feature I have found most valuable with NetCool is how it collaborates all the alarms, and then it does a predictive analysis, providing a consolidated alarm view and management."

"The solution has very good integration capabilities."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool pros

Cons

"The integration with other network devices needs improvement."

"I would like to see additional modules included."

"One notable deficiency is the lack of online support for the product."

"HPE Intelligent Management Center is a bit slow."

"I face the issue with the integration with links on Fortinet Firewall."

"The solution does not have any AI capabilities."

"Tivoli NetCool's has medium scalability - there are some problems with its replications not being mature."

"The installation could be simplified, and technical support could be faster."

"UI is outdated, very old legacy."

"The solution is not user-friendly."

"Customization and integration that you need to do to make the product fit your needs is very complex. It is not a product that somebody could easily pick up without any prior training or experience."

"The solution is too expensive."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution is not at all cheap, but it's reasonable compared to SolarWinds."

"There are licensing costs and they are quite expensive."

"It costs around 100k for every ten servers, which is lower than similar products from other vendors."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The price of the product is too expensive."

"Customers are required to pay a licensing fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE Intelligent Management Center?

I face the issue with the integration with links on Fortinet Firewall. This will be sorted out with the help of IMC, and now I have a modem dialing as per my needs.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Intelligent Management Center?

I am using this solution for network monitoring, links monitoring, and complete monitoring of my infrastructure. I also deploy FortiVAF, FortiAnalyzer, and FortiManager as part of a complete securi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE Intelligent Management Center?

I rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have worked from 1973 with all kind of systems in large enterprises across the world. And have experience with all kind of software in monitoring from infra to end to end, it depends on the funct...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Tivoli NetCool?

The tool had many built-in automation capabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool?

The main challenge is its licensing model, which is very complicated.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 28% of the time

Aruba Airwave vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 14% of the time

H3C intelligent Management Center vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiManager vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE Intelligent Management Center Competitors

OpenText Network Node Manager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 16% of the time

DataMiner vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiManager vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds Network Topology Mapper vs IBM Tivoli NetCool

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

January 2026

HPE Intelligent Management Center report

Download HPE Intelligent Management Center product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool

January 2026

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool product report

Also Known As

HPE IMC

Tivoli NetCool

Overview

HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) is a comprehensive management platform that was built from the ground up to support the Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security (FCAPS) model. It provides features and functions that are designed for comprehensive management of the network infrastructure. IMC was designed to provide the following functions:

Supports the ITIL operational center of excellence IT practices model.
Uses a single-pane management paradigm to enable end-to-end business management of IT services

Provides scalability by supporting distributed and hierarchical system architectures, through additional operating system and database support.

Uses an SOA model to provide full resource, service, and user management.
Enables integration of traditionally separate management tools using a modular design.
Enables enterprises to expand their infrastructure management in scale and to seamlessly accommodate new technologies at the same time.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

IBM Tivoli Netcool delivers near real-time, consolidated event management across business infrastructure, data centers, complex networks and IT domains. The software provides full management and automation to help you deliver continuous uptime of business services and applications.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Claranet, Consolidated Communications, Telus, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Telekom Srbija, Bendigo Community Telco, Capgemini, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB)

Buyer's Guide

HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool

December 2025

Free Report: HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. IBM Tivoli NetCool report.

See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.