

Nasuni and HPE Zerto Software compete in data management and disaster recovery solutions. Nasuni appears to have an edge in flexible file storage and NAS replacements, while HPE Zerto Software leads in robust disaster recovery and replication capabilities.
Features: Nasuni offers global file locking, seamless data recovery from the cloud, and an easy-to-use management dashboard for consistent data views and auditing. HPE Zerto Software provides near-synchronous replication, automated failovers, and seamless multi-cloud integration, crucial for minimizing data loss.
Room for Improvement: Nasuni could enhance user accessibility, monitoring, and cloud integration. Users also seek better data location visibility. For HPE Zerto Software, refining Hyper-V orchestration, improving support documentation, and simplifying the licensing model are suggested areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nasuni's straightforward deployment in hybrid clouds and responsive customer support receive praise. HPE Zerto Software enjoys positive feedback for solid customer service and smooth deployments across environments, though users feel the processes could be more user-friendly.
Pricing and ROI: Nasuni's subscription model based on storage capacity offers competitive pricing with strong ROI by minimizing on-prem infrastructure costs. HPE Zerto Software, though more expensive, is valued for its comprehensive disaster recovery features, offering justified costs with minimal downtime and data loss.
Before, it was a huge cost. It was several thousand dollars to do a DR test, whereas now, I click a button.
It saves us a lot of time and gives us the ability to perform other DR plans for other systems.
It's not only in the cloud; it's DR as a service, which means that the recovery operations are performed by a dedicated team specializing in this area.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
When I open a ticket, I usually get a call within an hour or two.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Customers need to follow good engineering practices for optimal product use.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
I rated the scalability as seven because even though the solution can scale, load balancing must be done manually, as it's not automated.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
The ease of use was so good with Zerto that they were able to migrate things much quicker.
It is very reliable.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
If the host has a lot of VMs on it, there may not always be enough time to relocate all of the VMs from a protection group standpoint to other hosts before the replication appliance that Zerto uses to manage that powers itself down.
If HPE Zerto Software has it built-in where we're going to vCenter and you click on it, it will build the VPG and indicate configuration requirements, that would be amazing.
I suggest Nasuni improve their syslog forwarders to support TCP protocol, as it's more secure than UDP, which is plain text and not protected at all.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
Zerto is easier to set up and use, and it's less expensive.
I prefer solutions with lower pricing.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
The features I find most valuable in Nasuni are the unlimited snapshots, antivirus capabilities, auditing, and ransomware protection.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE Zerto Software | 4.9% |
| Nasuni | 6.1% |
| Other | 89.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 92 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 94 |
| Large Enterprise | 202 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.
Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.
What are Nasuni's Key Features?Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.
We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.