Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

IBM and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. IBM is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.5, while WSO2 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. IBM holds a 0.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews
  • 1,293 Views
  • 621 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 API Manager
Read 41 WSO2 API Manager reviews
  • 5,442 Views
  • 5,442 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

WSO2 API Manager and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration are competitive products in the API management and integration space. WSO2 API Manager appeals for its cost-effectiveness whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration stands out for its comprehensive features.

Features:WSO2 API Manager offers seamless API lifecycle management, strong analytics, and scalability, primarily due to its open-source flexibility. It provides robust support services and a simple user interface. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration boasts end-to-end integration capabilities, hybrid cloud flexibility, and AI-driven automation. It offers advanced integration and broad functionality, distinguishing it with comprehensive features suitable for complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement:WSO2 API Manager could enhance its integration capacity to match broader enterprise needs, expand support for advanced security features, and improve the documentation of new functionalities. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration could streamline its setup process to simplify deployment, reduce overall complexity, and provide more cost-effective pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:WSO2 API Manager is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive support, making it user-friendly. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration involves more intricate setups due to its comprehensive nature, but its robust documentation and superior customer service assist in mitigating complexities. WSO2 provides a more direct approach, whereas IBM delivers a stable deployment environment for complex needs.

Pricing and ROI:WSO2 API Manager is attractive for its lower setup costs and agile ROI, making it appealing for cost-efficient solutions. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration requires a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI through extensive integration capabilities and efficiency improvements. The primary contrast lies in affordability versus comprehensive return value, where WSO2 offers cost savings, and IBM offers high returns for strategic investments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Ranking in API Management
27th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (16th)
WSO2 API Manager
Ranking in API Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 5.0%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla - PeerSpot reviewer
A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation
I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.
Read full review
VishalSingh14 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration
I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."
"It is a stable solution."
"We use the vanilla version of the WSO2 API Manager and integrate additional features ourselves. The basic features of the API Manager, such as blacklisting and whitelisting, are very helpful. We also created dashboards."
"The most interesting feature is its Mac-based function."
"As far as I am aware this solution is the first API Publisher that allows you to create and publish API and to manage the API lifecycle."
"The product is easy to use."
"The user interface is easy to navigate, and the documentation is extensive. It's open-source, so everything is available, and we can create what we need. That's not necessarily a feature, but it's an advantage."
"WSO2 is very stable."
"The flexibility is definitely a highlight. We have flexible mapping capabilities, allowing us to provide common mappings or create custom ones as needed."
"The scalability is fine for our purposes."
More WSO2 API Manager pros
 

Cons

"The initial setup is not easy."
"The pricing can be improved."
"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The solution’s interface should be more user-friendly."
"They don't have different URLs for administrators."
"For fresh graduates and engineers, the setup process can be very difficult."
"I think they could greatly improve the general UX with their solutions."
"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."
"I would like to see improvements in the speed of the solution as it can be a bit slow compared to other platforms along with addressing memory issues would be beneficial."
"WSO2 API Manager could improve the API approval system."
"Integration is an area that needs to be improved."
More WSO2 API Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."
"It is an expensive solution."
"We use the open-source version of WSO2 API Manager, there is no cost."
"It is costly, around ten thousand per year, per instance"
"WSO2 API Manager is quite an expensive tool. I rate the product's pricing a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."
"WSO2 API Manager is an open-source solution."
"For our projects, we found the pricing to be a little high."
"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."
"The challenge is the increasing pricing, which has led some customers to consider alternatives, like using Spring Boot solutions instead. The rising costs, especially as cores and usage increase, have been a concern, prompting some to migrate to other products."
"I think the other competitors that are providing the same solution are quite expensive. WSO2 API Manager is quite cheap."
More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?
It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...
See all answers
What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?
It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?
We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing. It is uncertain whethe...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?
We use WSO2 API Manager ( /products/wso2-api-manager-reviews ) to integrate our telecom products with third-party REST APIs. We are orchestrating services where our business process defines the int...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 37% of the time
IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 13% of the time
IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 8% of the time
webMethods.io vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Logo
webMethods.io vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration
Compared 8% of the time
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 19% of the time
Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 19% of the time
Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 14% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 10% of the time
More WSO2 API Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
API Management
July 2025
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reportDownload IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report
Buyer's Guide
WSO2 API Manager
July 2025
WSO2 API Manager reportDownload WSO2 API Manager product report
 

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs. 

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics. 

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2
 

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation
1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
July 2025
Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.