IBM ECM vs Nuxeo comparison

IBM and Hyland are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. IBM is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Hyland is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 2.2% mindshare in ECM, compared to Hyland’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

IBM ECM

Read 16 IBM ECM reviews

639 Views
518 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Nuxeo

Read 2 Nuxeo reviews

332 Views
274 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM ECM

Nuxeo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM ECM and Nuxeo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM ECM vs. Nuxeo Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM ECM vs. Nuxeo

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM ECM

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nuxeo

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of IBM ECM is 2.2%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nuxeo is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Omar_Ismail

ECM, Archives and Digital Preservation Consultant at DataServe

A stable solution for automation with high availability

Moving to the cloud with IBM ECM is not allowed. In Saudi Arabia, the cloud infrastructure is still non-operational, potentially for the next two to three months. Static clouds are prevalent among foundational enterprises such as IBM and Oracle. IBM offers its cloud insights, maintaining its cloud ecosystem. IBM's efforts to enhance the user experience within its ECM platform are lacking compared to competitors like OpenText. Progress in implementing new technologies and features seems sluggish. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2650419

Customer Success Manager at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Powerful data model building enables comprehensive document management for government sectors

The learning curve in Nuxeo is not easy, and it requires additional time. It's challenging to onboard new users or new developers. The resources on Hyland are good but lack exercises and use cases to apply by oneself during learning. There is not much practice to apply that knowledge directly on Nuxeo and get further details into the platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The content management is all about you as you can make the same content for minimal purpose solutions applications."

"The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, etc."

"The vertical scalability, as we can use it across some of our applications."

"The scalability is a valuable feature, that we're able to display our documents to so many people."

"Nuxeo is very powerful in terms of building up the data model and the context model."

Cons

"I would like to see seamless application integration."

"I think it's already getting away from Java applets. A lot of our users struggle with keeping up to date with Java versioning, so a lot of the functions they're doing, like printing, emailing, and even some of the viewing, they're struggling with."

"I would recommend not going with ECM 8 and going with FileNet instead. It seems like that is the future of the lower-volume repository. It seems like they are moving away from ECM 8.5 so I think we're going to have some challenges coming up, getting off of that technology."

"The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days."

"The learning curve in Nuxeo is not easy, and it requires additional time. It's challenging to onboard new users or new developers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Reach out to local IBM partners."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

35%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Insurance Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM ECM?

The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Mic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM ECM?

The product is expensive and has a perpetual license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM ECM?

The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nuxeo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nuxeo?

We are mainly using Nuxeo for the government sector, and we are providing document management for those government sectors and universities. So, the main use cases are for government and universities.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nuxeo?

The overall rating for Nuxeo is eight out of ten. My advice would be to consider sector and customer requirements carefully when choosing a platform.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM FileNet vs IBM ECM

Compared 31% of the time

Alfresco vs IBM ECM

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs IBM ECM

Compared 12% of the time

SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management vs IBM ECM

Compared 11% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs IBM ECM

Compared 10% of the time

More IBM ECM Competitors

Alfresco vs Nuxeo

Compared 50% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Nuxeo

Compared 23% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs Nuxeo

Compared 15% of the time

SharePoint vs Nuxeo

Compared 12% of the time

More Nuxeo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM ECM

May 2025

Download IBM ECM product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

May 2025

Download Nuxeo product report

Overview

IBM Content Foundation on Cloud

IBM Content Foundation on Cloud allows organizations to deliver extensive enterprise content management capabilities to their users very quickly. IBM Content Foundation is powered by the FileNet content and process platform and IBM Content Navigator user experience. This cloud offering can be leveraged for a variety of use cases including collaborative document management, imaging solutions, social content management, archiving, and more. It also offers a platform for developing Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions in the cloud.

IBM Case Manager on Cloud

IBM Case Manager on Cloud is a solution platform that engages people with business content, provides contextual insight through real-time analytics, and enhances teamwork through collaboration tools and flexible workflow. Enables Business and IT to work together to create solutions across the enterprise that enables an organization to make smarter decisions for better business outcomes, while balancing the need for security and compliance in a world of heightened risk.

IBM

Nuxeo, now part of Hyland, makes it easy to build smart content applications that enhance customer experiences, improve decision making, and accelerate products to market. Common use cases for the Nuxeo Platform include digital asset management (DAM), enterprise content management (ECM), product asset management (PAM), document management, case management, and knowledge management. The Nuxeo Platform has been architected to take full advantage of the cloud and uses a modular architecture to deliver elastic scalability and performance. The platform provides critical content management capabilities with advanced functionality in search, collaboration, workflow, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), renditions, a configurable user interface, and the industry's most advanced metadata modeling. Leading organizations use Nuxeo to modernize their information management systems or accelerate ideas to market by connecting data and digital assets.

Hyland

Sample Customers

KeyBank, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank, Sistema Tecnol‹gico de Monterrey, Illinois Department of Human Services, UnitedHealth Group

Electronic Arts, Jeppesen, U.S. Navy, Orange, GSD&M, Sirona Dental, Skyscanner, Verizon, Unizin, Enernoc, NHS

Buyer's Guide

IBM ECM vs. Nuxeo

May 2025

Free Report: IBM ECM vs. Nuxeo

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM ECM vs. Nuxeo and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM ECM vs. Nuxeo report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.