Panasas ActiveStor and IBM FlashSystem are competing products in the enterprise storage market. Panasas ActiveStor stands out in pricing and customer support, while IBM FlashSystem offers superior features for those seeking advanced capabilities.
Features: Panasas ActiveStor is recognized for its scalability and ease of management, suitable for high-performance computing environments. Its object storage capabilities and hybrid configuration add flexibility. IBM FlashSystem is known for its flash-optimized architecture, delivering speed and efficiency, with comprehensive data protection and broad integration options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panasas ActiveStor offers a straightforward deployment process with minimal disruption and responsive customer service. IBM FlashSystem, although more complex to deploy due to its enhanced features, benefits from robust support services that assist during intricate setups.
Pricing and ROI: Panasas ActiveStor provides cost-effective entry points, appealing to organizations with budget constraints and favorable ROI. IBM FlashSystem requires a higher initial investment but is justified by long-term efficiency gains and performance enhancements, offering superior ROI for those utilizing advanced storage over time.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM FlashSystem | 11.0% |
| Panasas ActiveStor | 0.8% |
| Other | 88.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 47 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.
In our most recent product, the ActiveStor Ultra, Panasas has developed a new approach called Dynamic Data Acceleration Technology. It uses a carefully balanced set of HDDs, SATA SSD, NVMe SSD, NVDIMM, and DRAM to provide a combination of excellent performance and low cost per terabyte.
• HDDs will provide high bandwidth data storage if they are never asked to store anything small and only asked to do large sequential transfers. Therefore, we only store large Component Objects on our low-cost HDDs.
• SATA SSDs provide cost-effective and highbandwidth storage as a result of not having any seek times, so that’s where we keep our small Component Objects.
• NVMe SSDs are built for very low latency accesses, so we store all our metadata in a database and keep that database on an NVMe SSD. Metadata accesses are very sensitive to latency, whether it is POSIX metadata for the files being stored or metadata for the internal operations of the OSD.
• An NVDIMM (a storage class memory device) is the lowest latency type of persistent storage device available, and we use one to store our transaction logs: user data and metadata being written by the application to the OSD, plus our internal metadata. That allows PanFS to provide very low latency commits back to the application.
• We use the DRAM in each OSD as an extremely low latency cache of the most recently read or written data and metadata.
To gain the most benefit from the SATA SSD’s performance, we try to keep the SATA SSD about 80% full. If it falls below that, we will (transparently and in the background) pick the smallest Component Objects in the HDD pool and move them to the SSD until it is about 80% full. If the SSD is too full, we will move the largest Component Objects on the SSD to the HDD pool. Every ActiveStor Ultra Storage Node performs this optimization independently and continuously. It’s easy for an ActiveStor Ultra to pick which Component Objects to move, it just needs to look in its local NVMe-based database.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
