IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

IBM and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. IBM is ranked #49 with an average rating of 5.0, while Tenable is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8. IBM holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

Read 4 IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment reviews

929 Views
901 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Read 45 Tenable Vulnerability Management reviews

7,052 Views
6,135 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Tenable Vulnerability Management and IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment are competitors in the vulnerability assessment category. Tenable often maintains an edge due to its accessible pricing and support, whereas IBM Guardium stands out with powerful features that may justify its higher cost.

Features: Tenable Vulnerability Management offers extensive integrations, proactive threat detection capabilities, and flexible security management. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment focuses on database vulnerability scanning, data-centric protection, and a comprehensive security approach.

Room for Improvement: Tenable could improve its reporting customization, scalability for larger enterprises, and advanced analytics. IBM Guardium might enhance its user interface, streamline deployment processes, and broaden its non-database integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable provides straightforward deployment with high-quality customer support aimed at simplifying the user experience. In contrast, IBM Guardium involves a more complex deployment process but offers robust professional support services to assist with implementation challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Vulnerability Management is known for its competitive pricing structure and favorable return on investment, making it cost-effective for many scenarios. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant ROI in environments prioritizing deep database security.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

49th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (11th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 3.2%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tenable Vulnerability Management	3.2%
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment	0.7%
Other	96.1%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Dr. Sajid Latif

Guardium Administrator at Interactive Group

Improvements sought in database optimization while benefiting from robust security monitoring

We use the analytical functionality of Guardium, but the analytical functionality is not so powerful or flexible because it does not include the application user ID. It only includes the database user ID. To identify risky users, it does not support end users, so IBM must incorporate this feature into the built-in analytical engine of the Guardium. There is only one problem I experienced while using Guardium: the internal database of the collector is MySQL, which is not so powerful or flexible. When you make a query in a MySQL database, it takes too much time to respond. IBM should replace this MySQL database with a more powerful internal database for the logging mechanism so that Guardium can collect logging data flexibly and ensure optimization. My overall experience with Guardium is good. The only problem is that IBM must replace the internal DB, MySQL, with a more powerful enterprise-level database because enterprises use it at an enterprise level, and MySQL does not support optimally.

Read full review

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers

Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Vulnerability Assessment feature is quite stable and helps identify numerous vulnerabilities in databases."

"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."

"It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."

"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."

"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."

"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."

"The integration of Tenable into our security ecosystem was very good."

"It is a very, very user-friendly tool...The setup is easy"

"You can customize each point in new scans."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"

"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."

"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."

"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."

"There is only one problem I experienced while using Guardium: the internal database of the collector is MySQL, which is not so powerful or flexible."

"The product is a bit expensive."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

"AI integration for reporting in Tenable would be beneficial."

"I would evaluate Tenable Vulnerability Management's customer service and technical support as average."

"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."

"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One thing not advantageous for it was that it was a little bit more expensive. I would rate it one out of five in terms of pricing."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

We are still using IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment. We only use IBM Guardium Data Protection and monitoring, data protection and monitoring, classical Guardium. We only use classical Guardium...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

We do not use IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment for data encryption or any other tool for analytics, or identity and governance. We do not use any other solution except for protection and monit...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I don't think that there is any very specific area where enhancements need to happen in Tenable Vulnerability Management's feature sets. The only area which possibly is not a part of the feature, b...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qualys VMDR vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 29% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 20% of the time

Tanium vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 11% of the time

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

January 2026

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment report

Download IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

January 2026

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.io

Overview

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment scans data infrastructures (databases, data warehouses and big data environments) to detect vulnerabilities, and suggests remedial actions. The solution identifies exposures such as missing patches, weak passwords, unauthorized changes and misconfigured privileges.

IBM

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.