IBM Planning Analytics vs Infor dEPM comparison

IBM and Infor are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Infor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.0. IBM holds a 4.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to Infor’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Infor users who would recommend it.

IBM Planning Analytics

Read 28 IBM Planning Analytics reviews

3,771 Views
2,112 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Infor dEPM

Read 14 Infor dEPM reviews

1,391 Views
1,363 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

Infor dEPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Infor dEPM and IBM Planning Analytics are competing in the enterprise performance management sector, each offering unique benefits. Infor dEPM excels in pricing and customer support, whereas IBM Planning Analytics stands out for its robust features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Infor dEPM offers integrated financial performance management and analytics focused on simplicity and flexibility, providing tools for financial transparency and strategic planning. It includes user-friendly financial management tools for effective budgeting and reporting. IBM Planning Analytics provides strong modeling, forecasting, and multidimensional analysis capabilities. It supports complex financial scenarios with advanced analytics, offering excellent scalability suitable for large enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Infor dEPM could enhance its advanced analytics options and improve scalability to better suit large enterprise needs. The user interface could be modernized for improved navigation. IBM Planning Analytics may benefit from simplifying its deployment process to reduce the learning curve and increase ease of use. Enhancing integration capabilities with third-party applications could further expand its compatibility and functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infor dEPM is known for a more streamlined deployment process with responsive customer service, improving the user experience. Its setup is straightforward with frequent support interaction. IBM Planning Analytics focuses on a cloud-based deployment and provides strong post-deployment support, though users might encounter a steeper learning curve initially. The product's extensive integration options necessitate a more comprehensive setup process.

Pricing and ROI: Infor dEPM generally offers competitive pricing with substantial ROI due to its value-focused approach and affordability, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. IBM Planning Analytics represents a premium offering with higher initial costs but promises significant long-term value through its superior analytical capabilities and depth. Investment in IBM can lead to considerable returns through improved business intelligence and forecasting accuracy, which justifies the higher expenses over time.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Planning Analytics vs. Infor dEPM Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Infor dEPM

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infor dEPM

Ranking in Business Performance Management

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 4.4%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infor dEPM is 3.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Planning Analytics	4.4%
Infor dEPM	3.4%
Other	92.2%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Gladys Njeri

Key Account Manager at DHL

Data-driven planning has transformed financial decisions and now saves major reporting time

IBM Planning Analytics helps with collaboration between teams by allowing us to gather data from various departments, analyze it, and collaborate on the data to make data-driven decisions between different departments easily. As I mentioned previously, I mainly use IBM Planning Analytics to visualize the existing data to generate meaningful report dashboards and use it during stakeholder meetings to arrive at the right decision. The best features IBM Planning Analytics offers include budgeting, forecasting, and what-if scenario analysis. The scenario modeling feature in IBM Planning Analytics is probably the most robust planning and forecasting solution we use, especially for what-if scenarios, where we are able to forecast using Watson Studio, which helps in better prediction. I really appreciate the Excel integration in IBM Planning Analytics because it keeps things familiar and adds more power.

Read full review

Dietmar Müller

Key Account Manager at Cronon GmbH

Customizable features streamline installation and integration challenges remain

Our company is a partner of Infor in Germany. We mainly use Infor DEPM for finance solutions Infor DEPM has features that are well-prepared by Infor. I do not need to have my own tools; I only need to customize many elements. This makes it easier to install and work with. With the prepared…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The flexibility of IBM Planning Analytics is a great feature of this solution. The design flexibility with data rules and defining calculations The ability to combine online and offline calculations are a benefit. Additionally, the forecasting features and predictive analytics is very good."

"Navigating through the data to make analysis is really quick."

"This level of stability is crucial for a product like Cognos TM1, as using an unstable platform would result in loss of time."

"The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you can't do with spreadsheets"

"It's a very stable, robust product."

"I would strongly recommend to go with TM1 Enterprise in terms of stability, scalability and performance."

"IBM Planning Analytics can help us build scenarios through a sandbox environment, allowing us to test multiple variables and assess their impact on our budget and planning."

"I would recommend Planning Analytics to other users as it's user-friendly, accessible, and flexible."

More IBM Planning Analytics pros

"I do not need to have my own tools; I only need to customize many elements."

"Budgeting and consolidation are the most valuable features in Infor dEPM, and the budgeting process and consolidation features prove very valuable when businesses work with the system."

"For planning and consolidation this is a perfect choice."

"The Excel integration is great."

"The robustness of the Infocubes, and the possibility of integrating both strong data analysis characteristics with pleasant aesthetic features."

"Our customers have the solution deployed on the cloud or on-premises. The deployment took about a month."

"The planning capability is the most valuable feature."

"All our customers have experienced a return on investment, as they have been included on the list of calls."

More Infor dEPM pros

Cons

"The CAFE Excel plug-in needs to be improved to handle all the features of older TM1 Perspectives plug-in for Excel."

"It would have been better if the solution was not just a tool kit. They did not embed some functionalities already developed, we are having to develop them ourselves."

"It is a bit expensive, but it does the job."

"The local authentication part is difficult to manage in the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

"IBM comes out with new versions too often, and it has an impact on quality."

"IBM Planning Analytics could be improved by simplifying the learning curve, as it requires a lot of time to learn and master it."

"The tool's transport layer could be improved when promoting development between environments."

"I think the software front-end on Cognos Contributor should be developed further to provide the final user with a better and clear design."

More IBM Planning Analytics cons

"A web-based version would provide greater usability and I believe is still in the development pipeline."

"However, I found it buggy, clunky, and very stiff."

"The usability could be better."

"We'd like to see improvement in the reporting feature. The usability could be better."

"The bigger the database with accelerators the more unstable it is, but without accelerators the model would not run."

"Flexibility to modify an existing Infocube, and better integration with other ETL tools on the market."

"The latest version has been cloud-enabled, but it requires a deeper understanding of programming skills compared to the previous versions, which were more user-friendly."

"There are questions about how Infor DEPM can be used with other solutions and the difficulties in connecting it with other software solutions. Integration is a concern."

More Infor dEPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."

"The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."

"Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

"IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."

"IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."

"It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."

"The pricing is competitive."

"It's a very expensive product, and I would rate it at nine out of ten, with ten being the most expensive. There are yearly licensing costs."

"While the licensing cost of Infor dEPM may be costly, it is still more affordable than SAP BusinessObjects EPM, for example."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?

The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IBM Planning Analytics is that the pricing and licensing cost can be somewhat on the higher side, especially for small organizations. Howev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

IBM Planning Analytics could be improved by simplifying the learning curve, as it requires a lot of time to learn and master it. The advanced features are somewhat complex to understand, and if the...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor dEPM?

Infor DEPM is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor dEPM?

From my perspective, I think Infor dEPM is a good solution for clients who want to deep dive into data analysis in finance, but it may be complicated. The user cannot make decisions independently a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor dEPM?

With Infor dEPM, I usually recommend it for finance, insurance companies, oil and gas companies, and hospitality industries. I have one client in education who currently wants to deploy Infor dEPM ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Business Data Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

Adaptive Insights vs Infor dEPM

Compared 20% of the time

Oracle Hyperion vs Infor dEPM

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud vs Infor dEPM

Compared 6% of the time

Domo vs Infor dEPM

Compared 6% of the time

Software AG ARIS Process Mining vs Infor dEPM

Compared 5% of the time

More Infor dEPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics

May 2026

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Infor dEPM

May 2026

Download Infor dEPM product report

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

Infor Dynamic Enterprise Performance Management, Infor PM

Overview

IBM Planning Analytics offers a robust planning, budgeting, and forecasting platform powered by TM1 technologies, integrating with Excel while offering real-time calculations, data governance, and security.

Supporting flexible scenario modeling and forecasting, IBM Planning Analytics enhances planning processes via machine learning, real-time data calculations, and meaningful collaboration. In-memory processing and data slicing boost automation, reduces errors, and increase performance, while the centralized database facilitates secure and governed data management. Sandbox environments assist users in testing scenarios, and integration with Excel is crucial for financial planning and resource allocation.

What are the key features of IBM Planning Analytics?

TM1 Perspective Client: Integrated Excel-like interface for a familiar user experience.
Centralized Database: Provides robust and secure data management capabilities.
Sandbox Environments: Enables scenario testing without impacting live data.
Real-Time Calculations: Offers immediate data processing and analysis.
Excel Integration: Provides seamless transition and collaboration for planning tasks.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Collaboration: Enhances teamwork in decision-making processes.
Automation: Streamlines processes, reduces errors, and accelerates tasks.
Data Governance: Ensures data security and compliance.
Performance: Faster processing through in-memory technology.
Scenario Modeling: Allows comprehensive comparisons for effective planning.

In multiple industries, IBM Planning Analytics is key in supporting budgeting, planning, and forecasting efforts. Financial services use it for cash flow modeling and resource allocation, while manufacturing sectors benefit from its dashboard-driven data visualization capabilities. Businesses utilize its robust reporting and real-time analysis functionalities to manage resources and assess future risks effectively.

IBM

Infor dEPM delivers comprehensive features like OLAP cube creation and user-friendly reporting, enhancing business intelligence and management reporting.

Infor dEPM integrates seamlessly with other applications, offering robust management reporting, multi-currency support, and flexible planning. Its transparent budgeting and consolidation functionalities are critical for sectors requiring refined decision-making tools. Despite its advantages, improvements in web-server performance and integration with ETL tools are necessary for smoother operation. Customization by consulting firms enables precise analytics and finance solutions.

What are the noteworthy features of Infor dEPM?

Import Master: Simplifies data import across applications.
Application Studio: Powers customization with ease.
Excel Integration: Seamless integration for enhanced reporting.
Infocubes: Provides robust structures for data management.
Multi-Currency Support: Facilitates international transactions.
Q&A XL and Executive Functions: Enables flexible Excel-driven reporting.

What benefits can users expect from adopting Infor dEPM?

Enhanced Decision Making: Facilitates data-driven management strategies.
Comprehensive Financial Planning: Supports budgeting and forecasting activities.
Streamlined Reporting: Offers efficient reporting tools for management.
User Actions and Write-Back: Supports interactive data manipulation.

Infor dEPM is widely implemented across education, hospitality, oil and gas, and insurance sectors. It assists in management reporting, budgeting, and analytical reporting, empowering top management to make informed decisions. Consulting firms customize the platform for reporting needs, offering performance tracking and finance solutions effectively.

Infor

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

DAB Group

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics vs. Infor dEPM

April 2026

Free Report: IBM Planning Analytics vs. Infor dEPM

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Planning Analytics vs. Infor dEPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Planning Analytics vs. Infor dEPM report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.