Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Planning Analytics vs Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
IBM Planning Analytics boosts budgeting productivity but faces challenges from rising costs, prompting some companies to explore alternatives.
Sentiment score
4.8
Oracle Planning Cloud reduces costs and errors, enhances reporting, but full AI potential is untapped; ROI in 2.5 years.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
IBM Planning Analytics support is positive, yet response times vary; documentation, training, and multi-level support are valued.
Sentiment score
5.6
Oracle's customer service experiences vary, with mixed reviews on responsiveness, expertise, and consistency, especially in overseas support.
Instead, we rely on third-party partners recognized by IBM, who provide cost-effective support.
We have a multi-level support system, with the initial level handled by the company we bought the license from and subsequent support from IBM.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
IBM Planning Analytics excels in scalability and real-time data, though complexity and pricing pose challenges for some users.
Sentiment score
6.9
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is praised for its scalability, high performance, and adaptability, despite some dynamic calculation limitations.
Scalability is quite hard to implement in TM1, largely since the on-premise installation chosen back in 2014.
Scalability is straightforward but it is pricey since it's a SaaS model priced per user.
With proper integration and mappings in place, we definitely get a good planning and bursting model for the whole group.
The scalability of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is high.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
IBM Planning Analytics is stable and reliable, praised for robustness, supporting budgeting in various industries with few issues.
Sentiment score
6.5
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is stable and reliable, preferred over on-premises, despite occasional user setup issues or bugs.
A stable platform prevents loss of time during this process.
The system takes more time currently since we may not have professionals available to handle the issues, making it more time-consuming.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Planning Analytics needs improved integration, pricing, visualization, user interface, functionality, automation, design, speed, and predictive analytics support.
Users seek better performance, integration, user-friendliness, and enhanced features in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud for large-scale applications.
The abundance of features results in complexity, requiring strict guidelines for developers to ensure simplistic approaches are adhered to.
IBM's visualization needs significant improvement.
The total processing time should be enhanced with the help of proper commands, specifically regarding the execution time of existing rules.
There were significant issues that led to discontinuing use of the product.
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve by creating a more visual and user-friendly interface similar to the old ABC analytics.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise IBM Planning Analytics has setup costs from consulting fees and varied licensing, offering market-standard ROI and compatibility.
Oracle Planning Cloud pricing varies; large organizations benefit from cost structure, while smaller businesses face challenges with minimum licenses.
Given the product's old architecture and interface, they need to make it more affordable.
While IBM's solutions were costly before, the introduction of SaaS models has reduced prices significantly.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Planning Analytics enhances planning with flexible design, Excel integration, sandbox testing, machine learning, and user-friendly interface.
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud offers efficient, customizable planning with cloud deployment, AI, streamlined workflows, and real-time capabilities.
It also integrates machine learning and AI engines, enabling us to use algorithms for inventory forecasting which optimizes our inventory and replenishment rates.
Its stability helps controllers win time in their planning processes.
It's a really good tool for integration and creating consolidated reports.
The most helpful and useful features that Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud provides are real-time reports, narrative reports, and real-time bursting forecasting for business functions.
The tool's scalability is noteworthy, as seen through its ability to upgrade, link to other systems, and adapt to new applications over the years.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Planning Analytics
Ranking in Business Performance Management
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Planning and Budgeti...
Ranking in Business Performance Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Financial Performance and Strategy Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 6.3%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is 5.0%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud5.0%
IBM Planning Analytics6.3%
Other88.7%
Business Performance Management
 

Featured Reviews

Gnanavel-Chakkarapani - PeerSpot reviewer
Can easily create dashboards and helps businesses improve forecasting accuracy
The product has improved our company's forecasting accuracy since it serves as a very useful tool for our sales and controller teams as they easily get to enter the inputs using views in TM1, which gets loaded into our main database. If there are sales team members in different parts of the world, like in Hong Kong and Singapore, they may prefer to use IBM Planning Analytics, which is easy to use when compared to the Excel tool. Speaking about planning analytics and data analysis, I would say that our company used to use IBM Cognos Analytics for reporting, where we used to use Cognos Dynamic Cubes so that users can easily use its drag and drop features while getting to see the data for which the users had to wait for two to three minutes prior to its use. In our company, tons of data are loaded into the memory, and users can use Cognos Dynamic Cubes to analyze data and understand it. The AI capabilities of IBM have benefited our planning strategy as they are very useful for business. The tool allows the easy creation of dashboard reports using AI capabilities. No technical knowledge is required for business use cases. It is possible to integrate the product in scenarios where some new integrations are available. I remember that my company used Azure Data Factory to connect Azure, Oracle, and IBM WebSphere Application Server. When it comes to IBM Planning Analytics, it is complex to integrate it with LDAP and or any other authentication tool offered by Microsoft. In our company, some users like to integrate IBM Planning Analytics with the common LDAP or Microsoft AD, which we currently use for all our applications. The authentication part is difficult to configure with IBM Planning Analytics. The maintenance of the product is easy. My company has scheduled maintenance on the product every week, especially during forecast times, so that memories automatically lapse and users can freely access their servers. The use of the tool has had an impact on collaboration within our company's planning team since everyone knows how to easily access the data and publish the results. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
Ashutosh Abhishek - PeerSpot reviewer
Real-time reporting streamlines decision-making but technical support could improve
Integrating narrative reporting helps the whole organization, allowing each person in the department to understand the flow. I was fortunate to get initiated in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud first, as that was the first project where I was placed during campus placement from college. It is the best solution currently in the market, though it is mostly designed for bigger organizations. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud a 10.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Retailer
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Retailer
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?
The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?
While IBM's solutions were costly before, the introduction of SaaS models has reduced prices significantly. Comparatively, IBM rates may be better than those of competitors, such as Hyperion ( /pro...
What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?
IBM is behind competitors like Tableau ( /products/tableau-reviews ) and Power BI in terms of visualization. Their visuals are less innovative and practical with fewer varieties. IBM's visualizatio...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
While cloud pricing may initially appear more expensive due to the absence of infrastructure expenses, it is fair. There's no need for physical servers or infrastructure management. The licensing i...
What needs improvement with Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
The interface presents some challenges, particularly in connecting to other systems. The product itself was somewhat expensive. There were significant issues that led to discontinuing use of the pr...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud?
As an end user, it took just a few minutes to get started, though the definition of implementation can vary depending on whether you're running the cloud or just installing the application. It's a ...
 

Also Known As

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1
Oracle PBCS, Oracle Enterprise Business Planning
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services
Australian Finance Group Ltd., Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., TBS Group, Delaware Life Insurance, Shelf Drilling Ltd., Abu Dhabi Department of Finance, Fugro Norway AS, Drake & Scull International PJSC (DSI), Racepoint Global, Edgewater Technology Inc., King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Communications Test Design Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.