IBM Rational Test Workbench vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

IBM and Inflectra are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. IBM is ranked #27, while Inflectra is ranked #32. IBM holds a 1.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to Inflectra’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

883 Views
486 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

1,115 Views
446 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

IBM Rational Test Workbench and Inflectra Rapise are competing software testing tools. IBM Rational Test Workbench seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive integration capabilities, while Inflectra Rapise is favored for flexible pricing.

Features: IBM Rational Test Workbench provides advanced performance and functional testing, seamless integration within IBM's ecosystem, and comprehensive support for API testing and service virtualization. Inflectra Rapise offers extensive test automation across web, desktop, and mobile platforms, easy scripting, and excellent cross-browser testing functionality.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Test Workbench could enhance usability to compete better with user-friendly tools and needs more adaptable pricing models for small teams. Inflectra Rapise could improve in scalability to handle larger enterprise environments and introduce more robust analytics features. Both products can further optimize their updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Test Workbench features a robust deployment model favored by large enterprises and provides comprehensive documentation with strong support. Inflectra Rapise offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, making it easier for teams to adopt quickly.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Test Workbench typically involves a higher initial investment, which is justified by expansive support and integration capabilities for long-term value. Inflectra Rapise provides a more appealing cost structure, delivering good ROI for businesses focused on cost-effective testing solutions with immediate return from lower initial expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Inflectra Rapise Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

27th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (19th), API Testing Tools (15th)

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

32nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (41st), AI Quality Assurance (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Rational Test Workbench	1.2%
Inflectra Rapise	0.9%
Other	97.9%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

Cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Non Profit

University

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Government

13%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 9% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 16% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 14% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 11% of the time

NICE Robotic Automation vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 9% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

February 2026

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

Rapise

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Inflectra Rapise

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Inflectra Rapise and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Inflectra Rapise report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.