IBM Storage Protect vs Iron Mountain Connect comparison

IBM and Iron Mountain are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.6, while Iron Mountain is ranked #61. IBM holds a 1.8% mindshare in BRS, compared to Iron Mountain’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Iron Mountain users who would recommend it.

IBM Storage Protect

Read 4 IBM Storage Protect reviews

5,686 Views
4,776 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Iron Mountain Connect

Read 2 Iron Mountain Connect reviews

1,103 Views
1,081 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Storage Protect

Iron Mountain Connect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Iron Mountain Connect and IBM Storage Protect compete in data management and protection. IBM Storage Protect holds an advantage with its comprehensive features, making it a preferable choice despite higher pricing.

Features: Iron Mountain Connect offers robust offsite storage, compliance capabilities, and enhanced security, meeting the needs of security-focused industries. IBM Storage Protect provides superior scalability, integrated data protection, and seamless backup solutions, addressing the demands of enterprises with large digital footprints.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Iron Mountain Connect ensures straightforward deployment and dedicated support for easy integration. IBM Storage Protect, though complex to deploy, delivers extensive documentation and support, suiting intricate IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: Iron Mountain Connect is affordable with a favorable ROI, suitable for budget-constrained businesses. IBM Storage Protect, albeit expensive, offers long-term cost-effectiveness, presenting strong ROI for large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Storage Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Storage Protect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Iron Mountain Connect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

61st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IBM Storage Protect is 1.8%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Iron Mountain Connect is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Storage Protect	1.8%
Iron Mountain Connect	0.7%
Other	97.5%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

reviewer2787573

Interim Head of Infrastructure at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Backup coverage has supported immutable protection and now needs a more modern, intuitive interface

IBM Storage Protect is from a previous generation of backup software. In those days, backup software was complex in setting up and complex to manage. The new software, such as Rubrik, is very easy to use and more relatable to younger engineers because its interface design is more similar to Office 365 and the newer controls and labels that we are accustomed to. The difficulty that we now have with IBM Storage Protect is that for this day and age, compared to other products that are out there, it seems complex. If we look back 15 years ago, all enterprise class backup software was complex, so IBM was not any different. However, many of these older systems, such as Commvault, still have the same complaint that they are very complex because they have tried to keep that same interface and the same way it works. This suits them, but it probably needed a complete overhaul to bring it into the ease of use that we have with modern software. However, that upgrade has not been done. IBM Storage Protect has not been upgraded into a modern platform. It still looks a legacy platform.

Read full review

Raj Bhaduri

Enterprise architect at Centrica

Good policies related to data

I primarily use it for various policies related to data, such as data retention, data deletion, and archiving policies. All policies can be set using this system The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities. I would like to see more integration with different platforms,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They have recently added support tickets specifically engineered around performance. This has been very useful for us when we run into issues where customers are looking to try to squeeze a lot more horsepower out of older system."

"Once setup, you do not need to touch it again. You just need to do a formal check on possibly batch updates."

"In the past, one of the most valuable features, and the biggest advantage, was the incremental forever feature. Not many other backup vendors provided that. In the pre-virtualization environment, it was very robust and simple technology, especially writing to tape."

"This solution has improved our organization through better file and database recovery."

"It is a very good and mature enterprise product. Once it is set up and everything is put in, you don't have to manage it. It actually runs automatically by itself."

"We are talking about a stable solution which boasts good performance and security."

"I have found that the most valuable feature is useful documentation and troubleshooting."

"It integrates well with Spectrum Scale."

More IBM Storage Protect pros

"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"

Cons

"We have run into some periods where we have found some tape issues which were causing us problems, but we resolved them. For some reason, we had a bunch of drives go offline on our disk storage (our virtual library)."

"It's difficult in terms of the configuration at set up. In our case, it required another admin, one person dedicated to the backup."

"We would like to see capabilities of long-term archiving and more support for hardware platforms."

"If you take Spectrum Protect into account, and you have it along with restrictions to Spectrum Archive by means of LTFS, this is also something which should be made better within the overall product's program."

"The software is very complicated. You have to do a lot of configurations to build a server, and you would need to backup and restore."

"The Hyper-V and SQL Server backup could be improved. In the 2016 version there was a significant improvement, but I think IBM has a big challenge with these technologies."

"I would like to see a way to have "always on" implemented."

"Restoring massive files is a very time-consuming process."

More IBM Storage Protect cons

"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is fairly reasonable as compared to other solutions in the market."

"The licensing fees are on a yearly basis, which for us it is about R400,000 (approximately $27,000 USD)."

"You need to put it in a PoC and test it out if you can."

"Its licensing is complex, and its price is not really reasonable. It is on the expensive side. IBM, in general, is slightly expensive, but with IBM Spectrum for the virtual environment, they are looking into the aspect of helping customers with the cost and providing a cost-effective solution."

"The solution has a capacity based licensing, front and back-end license."

"We worked our licensing into a capacity model, which is nice. Now, everything is much simpler to manage from a licensing perspective."

"The product is low cost. It is very cool when we design it to using licensing based on post capacity."

"We have been at our size for a few years. We are not really looking to battle the licensing costs, as this is our primary system."

More IBM Storage Protect pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Retailer

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	95

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Storage Protect?

The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Storage Protect?

I do not know the current licensing cost for IBM Storage Protect and how we get our support because our licensing model is not quite standard. We do not buy IBM Storage Protect direct from IBM. We ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Storage Protect?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 8% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 8% of the time

HPE StoreOnce vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Storage Protect Competitors

Igneous DataProtect vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 10% of the time

MSP360 Backup vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 9% of the time

Bacula Enterprise vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 5% of the time

More Iron Mountain Connect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect

January 2026

Download IBM Storage Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

January 2026

Download Iron Mountain Connect product report

Also Known As

IBM Spectrum Discover

No data available

Overview

IBM Storage Protect offers data protection and management to secure critical business information efficiently. It's designed to be a scalable and flexible solution for data backup, recovery, and archive needs in complex IT environments.

IBM Storage Protect delivers comprehensive data protection by integrating backup, recovery, and archiving functionalities. It supports a range of workloads and infrastructures, from on-premises to cloud environments, facilitating efficient data management. Its platform provides seamless scalability to meet evolving business needs, underpinned by reliable security measures. Organizations leverage its capabilities to ensure business continuity and minimize data loss risks, making it vital in a data-driven world.

What are the key features of IBM Storage Protect?

Advanced Data Protection: Offers robust encryption and data integrity for secure backup processes.
Scalability: Grows with your data demands, supporting large data volumes without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly integrates with cloud platforms, enhancing backup strategies with hybrid options.
Automated Operations: Simplifies management tasks with automation, reducing manual intervention and errors.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating IBM Storage Protect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage costs by optimizing backup processes and data retention strategies.
Data Safety: Ensures data accessibility and integrity during recovery efforts, building trust in data protection strategies.
Operational Efficiency: Boosts productivity through streamlined and automated backup management workflows.
Compliance Readiness: Helps maintain compliance with data protection regulations by providing thorough reporting and audit trails.

Industries like finance and healthcare implement IBM Storage Protect to safeguard sensitive information against threats. In financial services, it's crucial for maintaining client data confidentiality, while healthcare institutions use it to protect patient records, ensuring both accessibility and compliance with regulations.

IBM

Connected Accounting&ERP is a mid-range accounting program with single user and network editions for Macintosh and Windows operating systems. Connected can be shared concurrently by both Mac OS and Windows users on a single data file. Connected "Core Accounting" consists of the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable modules. Connected "Enterprise" builds on the Core Accounting aspects by adding powerful inventory, job costing, and currency additions. Pricing starts at $399.00.

Iron Mountain

Sample Customers

CEMEX

University of La Verne

Buyer's Guide

IBM Storage Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect

February 2026

Free Report: IBM Storage Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Storage Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Storage Protect vs. Iron Mountain Connect report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.