IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs Okta Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

IBM and Okta are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Additionally, 93% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Okta users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Read 29 IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] reviews

93% willing to recommend

Okta Platform

Read 126 Okta Platform reviews

29,125 Views
10,485 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Okta Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

IBM Tivoli Access Manager and Okta Platform compete in identity management solutions. Okta Platform appears superior due to its advanced features and cloud-based architecture offering greater flexibility and scalability.

Features: IBM Tivoli Access Manager provides robust access control, authentication, and authorization with strong enterprise-grade security. Okta Platform includes features like strong multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and adaptive security measures, offering a comprehensive suite for identity and access management.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli Access Manager could enhance its cloud integration and offer more straightforward deployment options. It can also improve the modernity of user interfaces and simplification of its configuration processes. Okta Platform could expand its offline functionalities, refine integration with legacy systems, and improve customization options for users seeking more tailored experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Tivoli Access Manager's on-premises deployment often requires more time and direct interactions with customer service. Okta Platform's cloud-based nature allows for faster deployment and offers extensive online support, providing more accessible customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli Access Manager has higher initial setup costs due to its on-premises nature but may offer stable ROI over time for existing users. Okta Platform, with a subscription-based model, generally offers lower upfront costs with quicker ROI due to easy deployment and regular updates.

To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Okta Platform

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Authentication Systems (3rd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (3rd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (2nd), Access Management (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (1st), AI IT Support (1st)

Featured Reviews

it_user711612

Senior Consultant at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reverse proxy provides central control over authentication and authorization.

It is a single product that caters for all the business needs throughout the organization. It provides a seamless integration that in turn encourages most of the applications to use the SSO features Reverse proxy is the most valuable feature as it provides central control over authentication and…

Read full review

Sravanakumar Nidamanooru

Identity and Access Management Specialist at a university with 10,001+ employees

Automated lifecycle management has cut onboarding times and now drives secure, clean access

Although I am a fan of Okta Platform overall, there are areas where it could improve security outcomes and reduce admin friction. My top improvement areas include the system log and analytics upgrade, which are great for point troubleshooting, but trending and root cause analysis across large tenants still require exporting to SIEM. Verbose queries and long-range retention costs can add up. Additionally, while certificate rotations are better than most, the process is still manual for busy portfolios, especially concerning multi-SP SAML certificate rotations and app metadata drift. Two more buckets of potential improvements for Okta Platform involve user experience and security. There is the issue of push fatigue and prompt sprawl, where users receive multiple prompts across different apps and sessions. I arrived at the rating of eight because the core controls are strong and reliable, but a few operational UX and UI gaps prevent it from being rated higher. The reasons for not giving it a nine or ten include ongoing issues concerning safety and change safety, the complexity of group rules and mappings, and the lack of robustness in policy management. Additionally, there remains a need for more manual involvement than necessary, especially for large portfolios and dual certificate rotation, along with proactive SP data metadata validation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a single product that caters for all the business needs throughout the organization."

"We have managed to automate the creation of all employees, and the company's clients and then assign the accounts/accesses according to business need."

"Some of the valuable features are: Reverse proxy Protected object space Ease of integration Multiple and robust AuthN and AuthZ mechanisms built-in No single point of failure (SPOF)"

"Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites."

"I like the primary function of this product allowing the administration of user/network accounts with a fair amount of ease."

"Flexibility to connect with different environments and product stability are the best features."

"It has helped them to improve and control web and mobile application security."

"The combination of TAM with IDM in IBM Tivoli Identity Manager helped us to realize robust and secure authentication infrastructure in accordance with industry regulations and laws."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] pros

"Okta Platform helped me secure access to cloud infrastructure, APIs, containerized workloads, and AI/GenAI services in my architecture, enhancing our security posture significantly."

"I like the tool's workflows, which is user-friendly. It can integrate with different applications. I particularly like that users are delighted to access their applications without the hassle of entering their username and password each time. It truly enhances user-friendliness."

"The product is easy to use."

"Valuable features include UD, SSO functionality, MFA and Adaptive MFA functionality, ability to link multiple Directory databases with UD."

"Okta Platform is the gold standard when it comes to identity providers and the single sign-on experience."

"What I found most valuable in Okta Workforce Identity is that it worked together with VMware Workspace One, so there was this device check at the same time. My company used the trusted device method that enabled you to define that only the trusted devices including the Workspace One agent were able to access the applications directly without an additional authentication step."

"The initial setup is easy."

"What it's done for our clients is it's reduced the number of staff they need in order to manage their campus and their partner community services."

More Okta Platform pros

Cons

"I have not tested the stability yet."

"Web Portal Manager does not implement the full set of functions found in the command line"

"The product has not been updated with emerging technologies over the years specifically around AJAX, REST and Mobile app integration."

"Yes, because there are so many moving parts it can often be difficult getting it right first time."

"What I don’t particularly like is the flow duration."

"The self-service portal needs improvement."

"Administration of the product can be improved a lot."

"Older TAM versions are not compatible for connecting to a DB."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] cons

"The ability or the options in the solution for changing the look and feel are not good enough because in our partner portal, essentially what they have is an ugly admin interface."

"I think the setup in the beginning can be a bit of a learning curve."

"Okta Platform is a bit expensive compared to other solutions. Okta Platform is a bit expensive, and in fact, I am using the managed services from Okta Platform; they too are a bit expensive for us, but we are using them because we are happy to go with this solution."

"A room for improvement in Okta Workforce Identity is its price. It could be cheaper."

"Okta Platform, especially in Europe where we are based, could improve the level of service; in some situations, I think it's not at the same level of the quality of the platform."

"The product does not offer enough integration capabilities."

"Some limitations in scalability. Each application we work with can be completely different, resulting in highly variable implementation processes."

"We faced some challenges during the Okta Identity Workforce deployment. Integrating with AWS and other cloud services posed some limitations with federated options. For instance, features like automatic user addition from AWS to the tool were missing, requiring manual intervention. The API is limited compared to the manual configuration possible through the UI."

More Okta Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."

"Price-wise, Okta Workforce Identity is a cheap solution. The overall cost depends on the license since you can negotiate with Okta or any of Okta's partners only if you opt for many licenses."

"The solution’s pricing needs to be reasonable. You are dealing with a lot of components and the pricing is component-based."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Okta's pricing is right where it needs to be and right in the middle of the market."

"Workforce Identity is well-priced."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"This solution is costly. Pricing is decent if you have less users, but it significantly goes up the more users you have, with its cost not justified."

"The licensing is per user per month and includes full technical support."

More Okta Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?

Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?

Currently, in Okta Workforce Identity we get the two-digit authentication code. Instead of getting the two-digit authentication code, if we had an option to do fingerprint verification, that would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Okta Workforce Identity?

I don't have many details about Okta Workforce Identity. I use the tool just to sign in to different applications that we have. We basically set up Okta Workforce Identity in our mobile phone. We d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Idira Identity vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Okta Platform

Compared 3% of the time

OneLogin by One Identity vs Okta Platform

Compared 2% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Okta Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Okta Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL]

September 2026

Download IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Okta Platform

September 2026

Download Okta Platform product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager

Okta Customer Identity, Workforce Identity

Overview

IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.

IBM

Okta Platform provides comprehensive identity and access management, featuring Active Directory Sync, user management, and app auto-provisioning. It ensures security through single sign-on and adaptive multi-factor authentication.

Okta Platform offers advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connection with in-house and cloud applications. Security features are robust, incorporating multi-factor authentication and SSO to prevent unauthorized access. Users benefit from its ease of use and the ability to integrate and manage numerous applications effectively. While generally praised, users note areas for improvement, such as high costs and complex setups. Better integrations with on-premises systems and third-party tools are desired along with enhanced error logging and reporting features.

What are Okta's key features?

Active Directory Sync: Simplifies app management by synchronizing user directories.
Single Sign-On: Provides desktop SSO for easier access to multiple apps.
Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust security options for different scenarios.
Universal Directory: Supports flexible identity management and configuration.
Integration Capability: Enables connections with both in-house and SaaS applications.

What benefits do organizations find in Okta?

Enhanced Security: Multi-layered authentication to prevent unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines user provisioning and app assignments.
Increased Compliance: Ensures secure access management aligning with IT policies.
Seamless Integration: Facilitates connections with various applications enhancing operational workflows.

Companies across industries implement Okta to secure user authentication and streamline onboarding processes. It supports access management for both on-premises and cloud applications, synchronizing directories and facilitating SaaS services. Organizations benefit from reduced credential management complexity and improved IT infrastructure compliance.

Okta

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc.

FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.

Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Cisco and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.