Icinga vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Icinga and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #42, while NETSCOUT is ranked #72. Icinga holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,642 Views
5,579 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

2,735 Views
2,598 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Icinga

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Icinga and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG are competing network monitoring solutions. Icinga has an edge in cost-effectiveness and easy deployment, while NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is favored for its robust feature set, making it ideal for enterprises requiring advanced analytics.

Features: Icinga offers extensive customization capabilities, flexible API integrations, and efficient alerting features. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG stands out with advanced analytics, deep-packet inspection, and real-time monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could enhance its analytics depth, real-time monitoring, and detailed packet inspection capabilities. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG may improve in ease of deployment, simplifying interface configuration, and reducing setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga is known for straightforward deployment and responsive support, simplifying setup and maintenance. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG, though more complex to deploy due to advanced functionalities, benefits from in-depth technical support and thorough documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga offers lower setup costs and faster ROI, appealing to smaller operations with budget constraints. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial long-term value for larger organizations with its comprehensive features and potential for extensive network oversight.

To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

42nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (15th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (49th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

72nd

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Icinga	1.1%
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG	0.6%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I use it for monitoring infrastructure and it was very good for that issue."

"We monitor all, starting from UPS to international mail chains."

"Icinga does the job and is fairly stable."

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring."

"I would recommend Icinga; it's an open-source solution, it's quite easy and simple to use, and checks can be run with Python code and Shell Script code."

More Icinga pros

"We use it for monitoring whenever we update a new circuit or site."

"It helps us to assist our customers to isolate problems. If it is us who is having the problem, then we can use it to streamline the process."

"It allows us to get quicker resolutions. We can see exactly what is using up the bandwidth, so we can assist end users."

"I love the single pane of glass view. It makes it easier to not have to navigate everywhere. It allows more simplistic visibility, without having to go from tool to tool to tool, or from window to window to window."

"If you are looking for a good application monitoring and packet analysis tool, you can strategically use NETSCOUT to get it done."

"When we have mobile operators who are signal partners, where one is the roaming host and another is the roamer, we are able to see their traffic. Their packets are able to detect if any faults to develop, and at what point they fail."

"An issue that used to take days is now fixed within minutes to an hour."

"We have seen a lot of return on investment: We have been able to recover radios in the field, we know exactly what is going on, we cut down fines from the service commission, and we have seen a measurable decrease in mean time to know, cutting troubleshooting down by days as we can now see the issues."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"The connection between Icinga and Icinga Web."

More Icinga cons

"The technology goes end-of-life on us every year, which is why I am looking forward to vSTREAM. I don't like when devices go end-of-life on us so quickly. If we can get more of an advanced notice of when an end-of-life is brought up, because our certification process within the organization takes a while."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement."

"The single pane of glass feed still needs work."

"It's not able to communicate with our probes."

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"Only problems that we have had are fiber issues going into the TAPs or vSTREAMs, which are usually local site issues."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an open-source solution."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"The solution is free to use."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The solution is cheap."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"The price is a little high."

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"This product could be cheaper."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

University

11%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 8% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 6% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 6% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

September 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG delivers fast, cost-efficient network visibility with a single pane of glass view, featuring real-time traffic analysis, dependency mapping, and performance metrics for comprehensive management.

InfiniStreamNG stands out for its real-time insights into network activity, providing a unified platform for managing network components. Its deep packet inspection, scalability, and compatibility make it an essential tool for IT professionals looking to optimize network performance and resolve issues quickly. User-friendly interface enhancements are anticipated for improved usability, alongside early product lifecycle notifications due to extensive certification periods.

What are the key features of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Speed: Enhances real-time traffic analysis and performance monitoring.
Network Visibility: Provides a comprehensive view with single pane device management.
Packet Inspection: Supports deep packet inspections for detailed data analytics.
Stability and Scalability: Ensures reliable performance and adapts to varying network sizes.
Compatibility: Seamlessly integrates with other technologies for smooth operations.

What are the benefits and ROI of using NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Quick Issue Resolution: Identifies and addresses network issues swiftly.
Efficient Utilization: Offers insights for optimizing resource use and network management.
Proactive Monitoring: Facilitates early detection of potential issues to maintain performance.
Application Performance Tracking: Monitors app connectivity and performance effectively.
KPI Evaluation: Provides comprehensive data for informed decision-making.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is implemented across industries for packet collection and analysis, serving network monitoring and troubleshooting needs. Companies in telecommunications monitor LTE roaming traffic, while financial institutions rely on it for analyzing banking data. It supports application connectivity checks and proactive remote site monitoring, becoming integral in evaluating KPIs and reporting network issues.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Free Report: Icinga vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Icinga vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.