No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IDERA ER/Studio vs MIMIX [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IDERA ER/Studio
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Architecture Management (10th), Database Development and Management (7th)
MIMIX [EOL]
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2796111 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Improved data modeling has reduced system footprint and strengthened finance workflows
I assess the benefits of IDERA ER_Studio's metadata management for my organization as not as good as Erwin's. Erwin's metadata management is better in how it handles data. There is a lot more user involvement in managing the metadata, primarily because in IDERA ER_Studio, the logical and physical models are separately defined in the same file, so you have to map them every single time. In Erwin, it has a unified structure, so if you make a change in the logical model, it automatically shows up in the physical model. You have to go through a couple of steps in the IDERA model to make sure everything has moved over. While that is not that inconvenient when you are actually doing development, as far as metadata management, that is prone to things getting dropped and missed. The collaboration tools in IDERA ER_Studio are adequate, but I think with Erwin, there is more of an opportunity for things to crash. Changes can be merged in IDERA more fluidly; however, the locking and sharing are a little bit more defined in Erwin. I think the learning curve for Erwin might be easier than IDERA ER_Studio, especially with connecting to different models and systems.
MR
IT Consultant at Ministry of Justice, Kuwait
A solution that offers excellent replication and easy implementation
We primarily use the solution for backup replication The most valuable feature is data replication. Everything about the solution is very simple, which makes it easy to use. The solution could use better dashboards for new users. They can look complicated until you get used to using the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Within a week of installation I had reverse engineered several existing databases into physical data models with basic data dictionaries and published them on the company wiki."
"Ease of use It looks good enough Ability to create HTML reports Ability to compare the model against the database"
"Straightforward setup."
"ER/Studio is good. It is really user-friendly and you can start without much training."
"It's a great tool for modeling and I'm generally very happy with its features."
"The most important features are logical and physical models that we can compare and develop. Also, the Data Dictionary can be created out of your studio. Finally, database schemas help understand the logic that's behind the scene, behind the SQL tables. Especially when there are a lot of them, the schemas help everyone understand the business processes."
"I feel the product's pricing is a good value."
"IDERA ER_Studio does a lot more and performs model comparison much better than Erwin."
"Customer Service: Excellent; their team is very knowledgeable and responsive."
"It has helped us cut down process time and manpower."
"It allowed us to have a stable, low maintenance, worry free disaster recovery solution that we can present to our management and our clients."
"Provides high degree of comfort regarding High Availability (HA)."
"It's used in our new architecture, for production, HA/DR and it works with different data groups."
"We used it solely for IBM AS400 replication for disaster recovery/failover purposes."
"Complete/custom machine real-time replication process (including apply and verification of destination)."
"By implementing remote journals, we have put the load on the target system as opposed to the source."
 

Cons

"Tech support is a sticking point with me. I am really disappointed in the tech support. We pay for the Platinum level. It takes hours to get a response."
"Whenever there is a new version, there are a lot of release notes on the technical side of it, but I would like to be told why are we doing the upgrade... What I would like to really see is how this benefits us from the business point of view. What are the real benefits that the user gets? I want some kind of way white paper. The release notes describe the technical enhancements but, from the layman's point of view, if someone asks me what are the business benefits of this upgrade, I don't have any documentation to explain it to the business."
"There have been some issues with performance, and there are some issues with inconsistencies."
"We receive these new functionalities, and sometimes we start to test them and we find errors that we need to correct by talking with tech support."
"The repository causes continuous problems, as it's slow and sometimes crashes."
"We did have a big issue when we upgraded to the 2016 version. The Team Server portion never did quite install correctly, and/or the database was corrupted, and we never figured it out."
"The solution could be sped up, as it is a little slow (e.g., when it's doing its database compare)."
"When building the relationships there should be a little more flexibility."
"Replication of the IBM i spooled files and files on the IFS system (Windows-like environment). About 1/2 the time, we have to nudge the system a bit to get the file(s) over."
"The solution could use better dashboards for new users. They can look complicated until you get used to using the solution."
"Monitoring tools can be improved but are very useful already."
"Replication errors need to be resolved."
"Switch procedures are not as easy and straightforward as it may seem at first glance."
"Could make it easier to fix object errors."
"The systems overheads need improvement."
"The MQSeries replication part doesn't work smoothly, sometimes requiring more manual activity to ensure synch between live and backup."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is okay."
"I use the product's trial version."
"At my previous company using ER/Studio, a database compare took four hours before using the product and 15 minutes after using the product."
"I feel the product's pricing is a good value."
"Pricing is expensive and on the higher-end."
"I'm a firm believer that all software is overpriced these days but, comparatively speaking, I think ER/Studio is worth the money."
"The solution’s pricing is high."
"The process of licensing could be much simpler, from our experience."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Construction Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Transportation Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise25
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IDERA ER Studio?
In terms of pricing, ER/Studio is slightly more expensive compared to Erwin, by about five to ten percent.
What is your primary use case for IDERA ER Studio?
I work in the finance industry, and the use cases for this product are very similar to what I mentioned previously when I discussed being in industrial management. It is simply a different product.
What advice do you have for others considering IDERA ER Studio?
I have not used IDERA ER_Studio's impact analysis tools, so I really could not judge that regarding mitigating database risks for security. I am not on the end as far as the pricing, as this is wha...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

IDERA ER Studio, ER/Studio, ER/Studio Enterprise Team Edition
Vision Solutions MIMIX
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Newmont Mining, Entrust, Accolade, TalkTalk, Catalina, Protective Life, NTT Data, dir systèmes, Microsoft; American Express, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Coriant, Fedex, GlaxoSmithKline, PepsiCo, Prudential, Wells Fargo
ACG Automotive, Autoliv, Takataês Manufacturing, AMPORTS, Faurecia, Unipres, Wheeler Machinery Company, PennEngineering, Parsons Corporation, Hindustan Dorr-Oliver Ltd. India, Amway India
Find out what your peers are saying about Quest Software, Oracle, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management. Updated: July 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.