Inflectra Rapise vs LambdaTest comparison

Read 28 LambdaTest reviews

2,889 Views
1,271 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Inflectra Rapise and LambdaTest are competing products in the software testing solutions category. LambdaTest appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and strong performance feedback, despite its higher pricing compared to Inflectra Rapise.

Features: Inflectra Rapise provides comprehensive automation tools supporting a wide range of applications and languages, focusing on automation versatility. LambdaTest excels in real-time and cross-browser testing capabilities, utilizing an accessible cloud platform. It also offers geolocation testing and integration with various CI/CD tools.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could improve by reducing the initial setup time and increasing cloud readiness. It may also enhance integration with existing tools. LambdaTest might focus on expanding support for real device testing and refining its pricing model to cater to more budget-sensitive clients. Enhanced offline capabilities could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise offers an intuitive setup with extensive documentation and personalized support. Conversely, LambdaTest simplifies deployment with a cloud-based system, reducing complexity and providing widely accessible service. Rapise requires more initial setup time, while LambdaTest boasts immediate cloud readiness.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise provides a cost-effective pricing model, ensuring solid return on investment through adaptable testing solutions. Despite its higher cost, LambdaTest justifies its premium price with superior performance in cross-browser testing, offering significant benefits that offset initial expenses through advanced feature offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: January 2026).

Inflectra Rapise vs. LambdaTest

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

32nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (41st), AI Quality Assurance (3rd)

LambdaTest

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LambdaTest is 2.5%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LambdaTest	2.5%
Inflectra Rapise	0.9%
Other	96.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Kumar Gaurav Jain

Head of QA at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Cross-platform testing and faster execution enhance testing efficiency

Don't worry about anything. Just go for it. There will not be an issue, as far as you know what you are buying and how you want to use it. Go for it, the platform is good. I rate the solution eight out of ten due to some areas needing improvement. I rate the overall solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"Automation and mobile testing have improved our efficiency."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."

"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."

"The primary feature that has significantly improved our test execution times is automation."

"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."

"The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."

More LambdaTest pros

Cons

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."

"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."

More LambdaTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"I used the product for free."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

16%

Government

13%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

I was not impressed with how detailed their analytics and logs are from LambdaTest. The solution we were testing is being used because many of us are working from home. It was easy to implement bec...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 21% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 18% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 14% of the time

NICE Robotic Automation vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 14% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 11% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 43% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 14% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

QA Wolf vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Product Reports

Inflectra Rapise

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Download LambdaTest product report

Also Known As

Rapise

No data available

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

LambdaTest offers real-time and automated testing across extensive browser and OS combinations with integrations like Jenkins and GitLab. It combines legacy and real device access for diverse compatibility, enhancing functionality and execution speed with HyperExecute and Docker tunneling.

Geared for businesses requiring robust browser compatibility, LambdaTest simplifies large-scale testing needs with seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. Its automation features and parallel testing capabilities help detect UI misalignments quickly while reducing manual efforts. LambdaTest supports cross-browser functionality with comprehensive documentation and platform fusions like AWS for enhanced utility.

What key features make LambdaTest indispensable?

Intuitive Interface: Streamlines user experience.
Real-Time Testing: Thousands of browser and OS combinations available.
Tool Integration: Compatible with Jenkins and GitLab.
Automation and Parallel Testing: Efficient test cycles and process streamlining.
Legacy and Real Device Access: Ensures broad compatibility.
HyperExecute: Boosts execution speed significantly.
Docker Tunnel: Enables local testing with ease.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Comprehensive Documentation: Ensures ease of use and knowledge sharing.
Enhanced Performance: Fusions with platforms like AWS offer improved efficiency.
Global User Compatibility: Reduces manual testing, boosts customer experience.
CI/CD Integration: Consistent performance across teams.
Efficient Resource Utilization: Lowered manual testing efforts and cost efficiency.

In industries demanding high browser compatibility and web responsiveness, teams integrate LambdaTest for automation, real-time testing, and maintaining global user experience standards. Its use in parallel testing cycles alongside industry-driven integrations minimizes timelines and optimizes workflows effectively.

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Inflectra Rapise vs. LambdaTest