

Informatica IDMC and Microsoft Purview compete in the data management and governance space. Informatica IDMC stands out for its comprehensive integration and flexible architecture, while Microsoft Purview shines in data governance and cross-platform compliance.
Features: Informatica IDMC offers seamless integration of MDM, data quality, and data integration modules, making it highly flexible and scalable. Its match-and-merge capabilities and user customization options enhance its appeal. Microsoft Purview excels with its data governance and lineage capabilities, providing a holistic data visibility and ability to classify and protect sensitive information across platforms.
Room for Improvement: Informatica IDMC faces challenges with UI intuitiveness and transitioning on-premises to cloud, especially in handling spatial data. Enhanced customization and migration tools are needed for better ease of use. Microsoft Purview requires enhancement in data quality and needs to improve DLP for non-Microsoft devices with better external tool integration and consistent documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Informatica IDMC offers flexible deployment options from on-premises to hybrid cloud, with personalized support despite some delays. Its technical support can be inconsistent. Microsoft Purview integrates seamlessly within the Microsoft ecosystem, focusing on cloud deployment. It provides proactive customer service, but faces challenges in integrating non-Microsoft solutions.
Pricing and ROI: Informatica IDMC is considered expensive but offers a high ROI due to its robust feature set when fully utilized, with a usage-based licensing model. Microsoft Purview offers a more cost-effective, pay-per-use model, advantageous for existing Microsoft customers and smaller enterprises. Both solutions promise long-term ROI, though Purview’s cost structure may be more accessible.
Leadership prefers to utilize third-party tools, such as Snowflake, which has both storage and ELT features.
The stability and performance remain issues.
Compared to Collibra Catalog, where the value is noticeable within six months.
Clients benefit from using a one-stop-shop solution, increasing their visibility across different platforms.
Due to the tool's maturity limitations, solutions are not always simple and often require workarounds.
Even after going out of service support, they still reached back to me whenever I raised tickets.
We expect more responsive assistance because they have the expertise since Informatica is their tool, but I don't see enough expertise on the Informatica support side.
Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations.
They're skillful people who know what they're doing in their space.
I have a dedicated team as a government agency, and Microsoft assists us promptly.
I have used the product over multiple systems and was able to write reports for large data sets without any performance issues.
As a SaaS platform, IDMC is quite scalable and provides complete flexibility.
There are many options available, and the licensing model is quite good, supporting our needs effectively.
With automation, you can label five documents or 50,000 with the same amount of clicks.
It allows for one-to-one connections with different types of servers, either cloud-based like AWS, or physical servers.
The product is scalable and works across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments.
Stability is crucial because IDMC holds business-critical data, and it needs to be available all the time for business users.
There are substantial stability issues with Informatica Cloud Data Quality on the cloud.
I find the stability to be good, with occasional restarts required every two to three months due to glitches.
It can take seven days to 24 hours to determine whether a policy is effective.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is absolutely fine in terms of stability.
The tool needs to mature in terms of category-specific attributes or dynamic attributes.
The current solution requires code-writing and tweaking, while other solutions offer material-level matches.
If the development interface could be optimized to have fewer modules, it would be greatly beneficial.
It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses.
There are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded.
A watermark feature or similar tools to help enhance security for end users could be added.
It ranges from a quarter million to a couple of million a year.
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is affordable for my specific use cases, with the pricing being rated three or four on a scale where one is very cheap.
Regarding pricing, compared to other tools I have worked with, Informatica offers competitive pricing, which I find not high in terms of starting strategy.
The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs.
I'm not exactly sure how much our license costs, but it is very expensive.
The platform's ability to pull in data from other platforms without the need for an additional integration tool enhances its appeal.
The connectors serve as the main functionality, making data integration processes more efficient by saving time and effort.
We could run data quality rules as part of Service Bus, which ensured the integrity of customer information before it was entered into our database.
It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time.
The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance has helped my company by finding insider risks, ensuring data loss prevention, and achieving compliance to make sure everybody is compliant.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview Data Governance | 11.5% |
| Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) | 4.7% |
| Other | 83.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 51 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 153 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) offers seamless integration of master data management, data quality, and data integration with a cloud-native architecture supporting multiple data management styles, optimizing data governance through metadata management.
IDMC enhances data synchronization and mapping tasks, utilizing a broad range of connectors to interact efficiently with data sources. Its precise address validation via AddressDoctor and intuitive navigation bolster user empowerment, delivering agility, scalability, and security in data governance. Despite its strengths, areas like ease of use, SAP integration, and reporting could benefit from enhancements. Connectivity issues and workflow complexities are noted, needing improvements in performance, support, and licensing cost. Users demand expanded ETL capabilities, real-time processing, and broader data source support to address growing data needs.
What are the key features of IDMC?In industries such as banking, healthcare, and telecom, IDMC is implemented for data integration, cloud migration, and enhancing data quality. Its capabilities are crucial for metadata management, lineage tracking, and real-time processing, ensuring high data quality and streamlined operations.
The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.