Invicti vs Kondukto [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and Kondukto [EOL] are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while Kondukto [EOL] is ranked #51. Invicti holds a 2.0% mindshare in SAST, compared to Kondukto [EOL]’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kondukto [EOL] users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

7,864 Views
4,482 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Kondukto [EOL]

Read 1 Kondukto [EOL] review

1,531 Views
1,148 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Invicti

Kondukto [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Invicti and Kondukto [EOL] compete in the software security market. Invicti seems to have an edge in deployment efficiency, while Kondukto [EOL] excels in feature robustness and innovation, offering value for its higher costs.

Features: Invicti provides automated scanning capabilities, comprehensive reporting tools, and efficient security measures. Kondukto [EOL] features robust integration, streamlined vulnerability management, and adaptability in complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti offers straightforward deployment with strong support that boosts user confidence. Kondukto [EOL] provides a flexible deployment model with extensive customer service options, though it may require a higher learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti is cost-effective with a competitive setup cost and notable ROI due to efficient operation. Kondukto [EOL] requires a higher initial expenditure but offers significant long-term value in return for its extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

16th

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (32nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (14th), API Security (12th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th)

Kondukto [EOL]

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

51st

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

DevSecOps (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kondukto [EOL] is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	2.0%
Kondukto	0.7%
Other	97.3%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

PrashantUppuluri

Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automated scanning has strengthened web application security and supports hybrid protection

A good scanning engine is what I appreciate about Invicti. When you want to find out the vulnerabilities within your web applications, Invicti has done a thorough job with respect to filtering out the vulnerabilities and identifying the risk factors with respect to the security modules within the solution. Invicti does have a segment of the solution which works on the automated scanning engine. As long as the license is active, the scanners that work within the solution are pretty effective. With respect to SAST and DAST, being a real-time scanning engine is one of the portfolios and one of the selling factors of the solution. Invicti is known to be a solution that works within the hybrid environment, be it cloud, on-premises, or a mix and match across multiple marketplaces. It does a thorough job. Most importantly, Invicti is a very good SAST and DAST solution that is very competitive in the market with respect to competitors. Invicti is a part of the Magic Quadrant with respect to Gartner's Magic Quadrant and has made a very good customer database and pipeline within the marketplace locally. With respect to security impacts in terms of support, Invicti is pretty much supportive. With respect to use cases or the POCs I have run on the solution, we have identified a couple of vulnerabilities and Invicti was able to trace them, detect, and quarantine the attacks.

Read full review

Mohamed Abdel-Hassanein

Co-Founder and Business Development at TeCrypt

Unified dashboard has simplified managing multiple scanners and improved vulnerability remediation

The best feature and biggest benefit of the product is the ability to manage different scanners from a single dashboard. Regarding analytics capability, Kondukto provides actionable insights into security needs because it performs all the work on the customer's behalf. It checks findings and vulnerabilities from different scanners, confirms that all findings are matched together, and makes it clear and confident that the final finding is truly a vulnerability requiring action. Regarding automation features, Kondukto is fully automated and fully integrated with a plug and play approach. In terms of integration with DevOps pipelines, the benefit is that Kondukto itself is not an integration tool. The DAST tool is integrated, and I can manage the scanner. The tool itself, whether it is DAST or SAST, will be integrated with DevOps and other tools like notification tools, SIEM, and SOC. The scanner tool itself will be managed under Kondukto, but Kondukto does not provide integration. There is no need because the scanner itself will integrate with other tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support."

"It is a very good tool."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."

"Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios."

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

"I like that it's stable and technical support is great."

"Netsparker has done an awesome job with its crawler, as it has found all of the links (also thanks to its good DOM parser)."

More Invicti pros

"Kondukto helps consolidate security findings by correlating them to minimize false positives and giving customers a complete and clear vision of high critical findings in an easy way."

Cons

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"When scanning a large web-based application, it tends to process slow and takes a long time especially on crawling and attacking part."

"Speed: It spends about one hour on scanning; I would like it to be less than 30 minutes."

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

"The scanning time, complexity, and authentication features of Invicti could be improved."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

More Invicti cons

"The primary concerns I have are that it is somewhat expensive, support would rate as seven, and there were licensing activation issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"It is competitive in the security market."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Snyk vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

DefectDojo vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

SonarQube vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Data Theorem API Secure vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Kondukto [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

October 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Kondukto [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

No data available

Overview

Invicti offers advanced web application security testing focused on identifying vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its Proof-Based Scanning minimizes false positives and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, making it an effective tool for enterprise environments.

Invicti provides comprehensive scanning capabilities that include detecting and verifying critical vulnerabilities and security data consolidation. Its scalable scanning engine and robust API support allow for flexible testing across diverse environments, including web and API testing. Despite some drawbacks like limited single sign-on integration and slow scanning speeds for large applications, Invicti remains a popular choice for automating security assessments, ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

What are the key features of Invicti?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
Proof-Based Scanning: Confirms exploitability and reduces false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development pipelines.
Security Data Consolidation: Centralizes data for better insights.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy analysis and reporting.
Scalable Scanning Engine: Supports testing in enterprise environments.
Robust API Support: Enhances flexibility in testing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Proactive Security: Actively identifies and verifies vulnerabilities to prevent breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain compliance with standards like PCI DSS and GDPR.
Efficient Vulnerability Management: Aids in prioritizing remediation efforts.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines processes with CI/CD pipeline compatibility.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Invicti is implemented to bolster security through automated vulnerability assessments. Its ability to provide insightful reports and remediation suggestions assists companies in efficiently managing security risks and achieving compliance with critical regulatory standards.

Invicti

Kondukto offers robust solutions designed for advanced security in software development. It centralizes vulnerability management, enhancing efficiency for teams and improving the security posture across projects.

As a comprehensive platform, Kondukto streamlines vulnerability management by integrating with existing development tools to automate and simplify processes. It informs users promptly about potential security threats, enabling swift risk mitigation. Kondukto caters to enterprises by providing essential insights and high adaptability in software environments.

What are the core features of Kondukto?

Integration Compatibility: Seamlessly aligns with popular development tools, ensuring a smooth workflow.
Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual effort by automating repetitive tasks related to security checks.
Risk Assessment: Offers detailed reports on vulnerabilities, assisting in prioritizing security fixes.
Custom Alerts: Configurable notifications to keep teams informed about significant security developments.

Why consider Kondukto?

Efficiency Boost: Streamlined processes lead to faster threat identification and resolution.
Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring maintains a high level of security assurance.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprises with expanding needs.

Kondukto is utilized in industries like finance and healthcare, where data protection is crucial. Its implementation focuses on integrating within existing ecosystems to strengthen security protocols without disrupting workflow. By providing relevant insights, it aids businesses in maintaining compliance and managing risk effectively.

Invicti

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Trendyol, Ödeal

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors and best Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.