IRONSCALES vs Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection comparison

IRONSCALES and Proofpoint are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. IRONSCALES is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0, while Proofpoint is ranked #30. IRONSCALES holds a 2.3% mindshare in ATP, compared to Proofpoint’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IRONSCALES users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Proofpoint users who would recommend it.

IRONSCALES

Read 14 IRONSCALES reviews

2,264 Views
498 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Proofpoint Targeted Attack ...

Read 1 Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection review

416 Views
333 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IRONSCALES

Proofpoint Targeted Attack ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 22, 2025

Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection and IRONSCALES compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Data suggests IRONSCALES has an edge due to its feature-rich offerings, while Proofpoint may benefit from pricing and support advantages.

Features: Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection offers advanced threat intelligence, email filtering capabilities, and comprehensive protection against sophisticated threats. IRONSCALES provides AI-driven phishing simulation, incident response automation, and proactive defense with faster threat remediation. IRONSCALES's automated capabilities and AI enhancements provide a decisive advantage in threat mitigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection has a thorough but potentially more complex deployment process with supportive customer service. IRONSCALES features a streamlined deployment praised for simplicity and efficiency, complemented by responsive customer assistance. The simplicity of IRONSCALES's deployment is a significant benefit, although Proofpoint's customer service remains commendable.

Pricing and ROI: Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection generally comes with a higher initial setup cost, which could impact ROI positively for larger enterprises. IRONSCALES offers a competitive pricing structure with a lower setup cost and swift feature integration, potentially yielding a quicker ROI. The lower setup cost and effective ROI of IRONSCALES make it a compelling choice for businesses seeking cost-effective protection, while Proofpoint may suit those prioritizing extensive service offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IRONSCALES

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

18th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (17th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (7th)

Proofpoint Targeted Attack ...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

30th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of IRONSCALES is 2.3%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is 1.7%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IRONSCALES	2.3%
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection	1.7%
Other	96.0%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Hemeshen Govender

Technology CyberSecurity at Oryx industries

Applies AI automation to clearly identify and stop a lot of phishing emails

The solution captures a bit more of the unknown, quantifies it, and applies intelligence to it to pick out and stop a lot of phishing emails that come through. The solution improved our response to phishing attempts. IRONSCALES has a virtual assistant and some AI intelligence that's applied to it. That was the main differentiator between IRONSCALES and Microsoft. The solution's AI automation clearly identifies phishing emails and gives you an overall indication of why it found the mail to be malicious. It does the whole analysis for you to see why the email was deemed a phishing email. The solution's response time is better than that of our previous tool. The solution's user interface is pretty straightforward and user-friendly.

Read full review

KrishnaChaitanya2

Information Security Specialist at Methanex Chile SpA

Dynamic runtime engine and good protection, but needs better support and a single console

We have two to three issues per month. We contact Proofpoint's customer support for these issues. I am a major point of contact for support. If I am not able to resolve an issue, we will be reaching out to them. Proofpoint can take a couple of days to get back. I also deal with other applications from Okta and Microsoft, and we get the support within a couple of hours. There is a lot of difference between a couple of hours and a couple of days. So, Proofpoint's support should be improved. Okta and Microsoft are also able to do a Zoom or video call, but Proofpoint provides support only through email communication. Only if you request, it would be a Zoom or video session.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a totally stable solution."

"The report function through Gmail is probably the most valuable feature. The next most valuable features are simulation and training."

"I would say the most valuable feature is what they call Themis. It's like a virtual analyst that uses the decisions that system admins make to generate a score for whether an email is legitimate, spam, or phishing. It gets better based on the decisions that we make over time. The automation piece is great as well. The integrated approach of email security combined with employee awareness training is excellent."

"The biggest benefit is that we get fewer phishing and spam emails, so using IRONSCALES has made our environment much safer."

"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to set it up, install, and manage the product."

"AI-driven phishing detection and incident remediation are valuable. It saves time from having to do manual analysis and investigation, and we also get alerts for phishing emails."

"There is buzz around phishing awareness training. When I make a campaign, all of a sudden people in our organization are talking, thinking, and wondering about it. Therefore, it keeps people on their toes. That is perfect because it does exactly what we want it to do."

"The fact that it is set-and-forget is valuable. Once you turn it on, you very rarely have to micromanage it, whereas, with a lot of spam filters, you have to go in very often."

More IRONSCALES pros

"It has a dynamic runtime engine, which gives it an advantage over Prisma that has a static engine. In Prisma, we have to do additional malware analysis, which is not required in Proofpoint."

Cons

"I would love to see the indication of compromise and how the solution utilizes open source resources. It would be good to see that included in the paid versions. It would be a small addition but add a lot of value for clients."

"There is a feature called Account Takeover, which isn't what I want it to be able to do. I know that they're working on that, but when they first started the Account Takeover feature in incident management, it didn't have much information. It didn't have any usability to it. I already had tools in place that were better."

"I think the tool can continue to hone the product to ensure the detections are accurate."

"IRONSCALES should bundle more features together instead of separating them and charging additional licensing fees."

"The integration with Google Suite needs to be better. it's something they can work on."

"The only thing that I could say is that some of the reporting features could be better."

"The simulation and training piece could be improved by having more granularity in terms of scheduling how campaigns are run and allowing people to directly take the training rather than having to go through an official campaign. That's not available yet."

"The tool supports 15 to 16 languages, but the content it uses in the training in Spanish has certain limitations."

More IRONSCALES cons

"We are using the TRAP console that has a Linux-based UI, which is not user-friendly. The TAP console looks very advanced. Currently, we are maintaining three different consoles, and it is sometimes hard to switch between them or try to grab the data."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay $3000 plus a little more a year for the number of employees we have, and we're not even that big. The solution is at the higher end in terms of cost. It's not the most expensive product, but I would say it's worth the price if you have a high volume of email traffic. In our case, the solution has inspected over 162,000 emails between three and four months. It saved us a lot of time and money. It's a worthwhile investment because a bad actor only has to succeed once; we must defend against everything in our business. IRONSCALES offers a sense of security and confidence from being well protected."

"IRONSCALES is an expensive solution."

"There is an installation cost. Since we have this as a managed service, we pay for licensing and the managed service itself. Other than that, there are no additional costs."

"The product is available as a middle-priced tool. I think it is not the cheapest solution."

"As compared to everything else we looked at, it was good. It was the best value for the dollars."

"They are pretty much the same as all the other competitors in the market."

"Considering the value it provides, it is definitely worth the cost. We don't have to do manual analysis and remediation of phishing emails, which saves us a lot of hours. Its licensing is based on the number of users being supported and the number of email addresses being protected. I'm not aware of any additional costs."

"The tool is not very cheap, but it is affordable."

More IRONSCALES pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

University

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IRONSCALES?

The solution captures a bit more of the unknown, quantifies it, and applies intelligence to it to pick out and stop a lot of phishing emails that come through.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IRONSCALES?

While I don't specifically oversee the pricing details, I understand that IRONSCALES is in the range of similar solutions while offering better results.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IRONSCALES?

There are areas that could be improved with this product. Regarding the Spanish language awareness training, while they are producing good content, it appears to be initially produced in English an...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Proofpoint Email Protection vs IRONSCALES

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs IRONSCALES

Compared 12% of the time

Avanan vs IRONSCALES

Compared 11% of the time

Mimecast Email Security vs IRONSCALES

Compared 7% of the time

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs IRONSCALES

Compared 7% of the time

More IRONSCALES Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection

Compared 66% of the time

More Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IRONSCALES

September 2025

Download IRONSCALES product report

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

September 2025

Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection report

Download Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

Targeted Attack Protection

Overview

IRONSCALES delivers cutting-edge AI-driven email phishing detection and prevention, seamlessly integrating with Microsoft 365 for enhanced security.

IRONSCALES, with its advanced AI capabilities, focuses on email security by detecting phishing threats, mitigating business email compromises, and preventing impersonation. Its integration with Microsoft 365 strengthens spam filters, automatically responding to suspicious emails. The platform is used globally for threat inspection, quarantine, and end-user incident reporting. Staff training is enhanced through simulated phishing campaigns, offering an extra layer of protection beyond Microsoft's spam filters. Areas for improvement include better Google Suite integration, pricing adjustments, and enhanced reporting features.

What features make IRONSCALES stand out?

AI Phishing Detection: Advanced algorithms for identifying phishing threats.
Microsoft 365 Integration: Seamless enhancement of email security within Microsoft systems.
Mobile App: Manage email threats on the go.
Anti-Phishing Training: Simulated campaigns for staff education.
Multi-Organization Management: Centralized administration for multiple entities.

What benefits and ROI should you consider?

Time-Saving: Automated detection and response to threats improve efficiency.
Comprehensive Security: Offers an additional protection layer beyond standard spam filters.
Ease of Use: Intuitive integration and user-friendly design streamline operations.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes potential email security breaches through proactive threat management.

In finance, IRONSCALES plays an essential role in safeguarding sensitive data from phishing attacks, ensuring compliance with industry standards. Educational institutions use IRONSCALES for training faculty and students on recognizing phishing attempts, thereby enhancing overall cybersecurity awareness. IT sectors leverage its capabilities for managing complex threat landscapes.

IRONSCALES

More than 90% of targeted attacks start with email—and these threats are always evolving. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps you stay ahead of attackers with an innovative approach that detects, analyzes and blocks advanced threats before they reach your inbox. This includes ransomware and other advanced email threats delivered through malicious attachments and URLs. And zero-day threats, polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and phishing attacks. TAP provides adaptive controls to isolate the riskiest URL clicks. TAP also detects threats and risks in cloud apps, connecting email attacks related to credential theft or other attacks.

Proofpoint

Sample Customers

Allegheny Millwork, Ayrshire College, Nium, Orris, Paramount School District, Pres Les, PRT Staffing, Recovery Unplugged, Telit, WebHelp

Brinker Capital

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

September 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Fortinet and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.