Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management and Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] are both solutions in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category. Additionally, 97% of Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management compete in mobile and endpoint management. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management appears to have the upper hand with its advanced features and intuitive deployment, though Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] was known for its competitive pricing.

Features: Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] excelled in remote control, scalability, and managing a wide range of devices, finding robust support in mobile device management. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is recognized for its AI-powered automation reducing manual work, real-time endpoint visibility that enhances security, and centralized device management simplifying administration.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] could better integrate with newer IT systems and enhance its automation capabilities to streamline processes. Its user interface was sometimes criticized for being outdated. Customer support responsiveness needed improvement. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management might improve by ensuring more seamless integration with third-party applications, offering more granular control for specific enterprise needs, and enhancing user training resources to maximize product utilization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] was known for its straightforward and efficient deployment. However, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management offers a more intuitive deployment process enhanced by automation and provides superior customer service support, ensuring smoother endpoint management.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] was praised for being cost-effective. In contrast, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management, potentially with a higher entry cost, promises enhanced ROI through improved performance, reduced operational costs, and modernized management, making it an appealing long-term investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

Anumula Hitesh

Senior Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack

Centralized device management has automated onboarding and improves remote security compliance

One thing I feel Microsoft Intune could improve is troubleshooting visibility. In many cases, when a policy or application deployment fails, the error messages are a bit generic. So, admins still spend time checking logs manually or testing on devices one by one. Compared to the simplicity of deployment, troubleshooting sometimes feels less mature. I also think reporting and real-time monitoring could be stronger. The dashboard gives useful information, but in large environments, many teams still depend on additional tools or scripts for deeper reporting and analytics. If I had to focus on one area first, I would probably choose troubleshooting and reporting. Deployment through Microsoft Intune is generally straightforward, but when something fails, identifying the exact root cause can still take more time than expected. Error messages are sometimes too generic, and admins often have to dig through logs, sync status, or multiple portals to understand what actually happened. I think user experience and policy management could also improve further. Microsoft Intune has become much better over the years, but sometimes the admin portal still feels fragmented because certain configurations open in different sections or redirect to older interfaces. For new admins, especially, it can take time to understand where everything is located. Another thing is policy conflict handling. In larger organizations, multiple device policies, compliance rules, and configuration profiles can overlap. When conflicts happen, the visibility is not always very clear, so admins spend time figuring out which policy actually won or caused the issue.

Read full review

reviewer2882148

Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally

In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Read full review

it_user1399731

Chief Technology Officer at Lane Clark & Peacock LLP

Offers scalability and ability to create granular policies

It is a very easy-to-manage and granular policy-based solution. Policies that you can create per device per user behavior are the most valuable feature In future releases, I would like to see more automation or bringing in AI into to understand device behavior. I have been using it for five…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its security is most valuable. It gives us a way to secure devices, not only those that are steady. We do have a few tablets and other devices, and it is a way for us to secure these devices and manage them. We know they're out there and what's their status. We can manage their life cycle and verify that they're updated properly."

"The Asset Management and Auto Pilot are valuable features."

"We can manage and standardize security across your environment, identify problems, receive alerts, and so on. That's its purpose, and that's also why it's so good."

"The user experience of Microsoft Intune is very friendly and the interface is very good."

"It is a stable solution."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend Microsoft Intune to organizations looking for management of a large number of devices and enterprise environments."

"The feature that we need occasionally but is really important is the ability to remotely wipe a device, control it, and perform similar functions."

"The most reliable feature is the integration with Microsoft XDR, which grants administrators and solution architects like me the ability to bring value to a business."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."

"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."

"By moving to Intune, they were able to save the complete cost for Ivanti Neurons for UEM and put it towards something they were already paying for, and additionally they improved enrollment deployment time significantly and now can deploy laptops in an hour and even give the task to end users."

"This is an extremely robust product, very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate, and most of our customers just set it and forget it while it does all of the automatic patching month after month."

"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to reduce the volume of daily tasks."

"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."

"I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

"Installing the packages remotely and remote control are the most valuable features. There are around 100 pieces or devices, and the only way to send a package to a device is by connecting to the PC and then manually sending the package. By using Avalanche, we can send a package to all devices with one click. It is very stable and easy to use. Their technical support is also very good. We have implemented this solution for our clients, and they are satisfied with this solution. It does what it is meant to do."

"The most valuable features of the Ivanti Avalanche are the remote control and the file transfer."

"It is a very easy-to-manage and granular policy-based solution. Policies that you can create per device per user behavior are the most valuable feature."

"The solution is easy to work with. I like its stability and flexibility."

"The most useful feature of Avalanche is remote control — especially the ability to remotely install packages to many devices all at once. When the client has, for example, 100 devices needing updates, it would take far too long to update each device individually. But with Avalanche, we just connect to all the devices through the PC and send the updates out with one click."

"The terminal remediation feature is valuable."

"Ivanti Avalanche has reduced the time needed to perform updates on all the devices across our clients' organizations; it's a great time-saver for the client."

Cons

"I would like to see easier pushdowns. Currently, we have to package our own software and then push it. Intune can make that way easier and integrate applications, such as Zoom and Adobe Acrobat, that are used by a lot of enterprise or corporate organizations."

"There is room for improvement, particularly in terms of compatibility, extending beyond the well-known major brands."

"Data leak prevention can be integrated into it. Currently, it does not have data leak prevention."

"Intune's server management could be better. If it could incorporate more features from System Center into Intune's Configuration Manager, it would be beneficial."

"The initial setup of Microsoft Intune could be more simplified, but apart from this, everything is outstanding and performs well as per our expectations."

"I've dealt with Microsoft way too many times, and needless to say, I'm not too fond of Microsoft support most of the time."

"The reporting and cost have room for improvement."

"In future releases, I would like to see better integration with Apple products."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"Regarding how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, the dashboard can be quite complex for first-time users and even small-scale organizations."

"Ivanti Neurons for UEM could be improved by providing training on the dashboard, which could help users understand better how they can get more out of the platform."

"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."

"An improvement Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management needs is a dashboard that shows which devices are not in sync or a proper dashboard that displays all telemetries related to machines with high CPU, RAM, missing patches, or those needing attention, or a health check."

"The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement."

"From my perspective of having just moved away from the product, I would probably give it a six."

"In terms of improvements for Ivanti Neurons for UEM, the only challenge I face with EPM Endpoint Manager is in scanning network devices, as some devices appear without a serial number, which is an issue that takes more time since customers often require the serial number as a mandatory field."

"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

"Its price could be improved. It could be cheaper."

"Its price could be improved. It could be cheaper. I would like to see a better approach for Android and an easy way to send packages and manage devices."

"The solution can improve by adding a kiosk mode option to the devices."

"There is a lack of flexibility."

"The tool's stability could be better."

"Because our clients are all very satisfied with Ivanti from their side, there is little I can say about room for improvement. However, I think that to stay competitive with other solutions offering a similiar solution, Ivanti could look into making their products more affordable."

"In future releases, I would like to see more automation or bringing in AI into to understand device behavior."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The Intune license model is costly."

"I liked the tool's pricing until P2 came into effect. I am unsure about the current value versus the cost of the new licensing model."

"If you're subscribing to Premium or E3, there are no additional costs for Intune, it's included."

"I am not that aware of the pricing, but as compared to other MDM solutions, Microsoft is providing a lot of things at the organizational level. So, it is quite reasonable as compared to other MDM solutions."

"Microsoft Intune is a cost effective choice. It is less expensive than other products on the market."

"Microsoft Intune has a user-based subscription model. You can go for a monthly or a yearly payment."

"It comes as a bundle, so you do not really know what the prices are. Microsoft does not break it down to the user cost for us. It is just bundled with our E5 license."

"Microsoft Intune is included in the E5 license at no additional cost."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

"The solution is affordable."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"It is expensive. Its price could be cheaper."

"You will need to purchase licenses for each device."

"The license is based on assets. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Other than the standard licensing fee, there aren't any additional or hidden costs, although I believe Avalanche could be made more affordable in general."

"Although the solution is a bit costly in my opinion, for customers who really need this solution, Ivanti Avalanche is worth it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	187

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that it is quite high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management can be improved by allowing me to drive optimization, proactive monitoring, and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

My main use case for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is support. I use Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management in...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 12% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 9% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

SOTI MobiControl vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Sophos Mobile vs Ivanti Avalanche [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

September 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

September 2026

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

September 2026

Download Ivanti Avalanche [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Microsoft

Ivanti

Demo not available

Ivanti

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Ivanti Avalanche is a robust management tool favored by organizations for mobile device and file transfer tasks. Its remote installation capabilities and policy-based management make it a reliable choice for efficient operations.

Ivanti Avalanche supports mobile device management and file transfers, especially in sectors like warehousing and logistics. Its stability and management features offer seamless remote control and package installation across devices, ensuring efficiency in environments such as transport and utilities. While users value its performance and technical support, there is interest in features like kiosk mode and broader Android support.

What are Ivanti Avalanche's most valuable features?

Remote Control: Enables remote management of devices, crucial for troubleshooting.
File Transfer: Facilitates efficient data transfer between devices.
Package Installation: Allows for simultaneous installation on multiple devices.
Policy-Based Management: Simplifies device management through customizable policies.
Granular Policies: Offers detailed control per device and user behavior.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Time Efficiency: Streamlines device management processes.
Stability: Provides consistent performance in dynamic environments.
Technical Support: Ensures guidance for optimal usage.
Cost-Effectiveness: A consideration for improving pricing models and expanding features.

Ivanti Avalanche is utilized in industries like warehousing, logistics, transport, and utilities for managing mobile devices, file transfers, and software updates. It supports technologies such as barcode scanners and thermal printers, assisting integrators in deploying solutions efficiently across client environments.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Frontier Airlines

Goya, Gist, TaylorMade

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, Kandji and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.