Jira vs OpenText AccuRev comparison

Atlassian and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Atlassian is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #22. Atlassian holds a 11.2% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 281 Jira reviews

19,738 Views
9,672 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText AccuRev

Read 8 OpenText AccuRev reviews

881 Views
872 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jira

OpenText AccuRev

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Jira and OpenText AccuRev are competing in the project management and software version control categories, respectively. Jira has an edge in pricing and deployment ease, while OpenText AccuRev stands out for its specialized features aimed at robust version control capabilities.

Features: Jira provides comprehensive project management features including customizable workflows, agile reporting, and extensive third-party tool integration. OpenText AccuRev delivers advanced version control utilities with its stream-based architecture and superior parallel development capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Jira could enhance its version control capabilities and improve performance issues during scale-ups. More sophisticated reporting and analytics features could benefit power users. OpenText AccuRev would benefit from expanding its cloud deployment options and improving user interface design. Accelerating the initial setup process could also make it more user-friendly for new adopters.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira offers a flexible cloud-based deployment with a fast setup and extensive online resources. It suits remote teams due to its ease of integration with various tools. OpenText AccuRev involves a more complex on-premise setup suitable for organizations requiring strict control over their ecosystems, supported by dedicated customer service catering to specific enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: Jira features flexible subscription plans with competitive pricing, providing a quick ROI thanks to its adaptability and low entry costs. It appeals to budget-conscious teams who need immediate access to project management tools. OpenText AccuRev demands higher initial investments but offers long-term value for organizations needing advanced version control, resulting in a favorable ROI where these features are crucial.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

281

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (2nd), Project Management Software (1st)

OpenText AccuRev

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Jira is 11.2%, down from 21.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AccuRev is 1.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jira	11.2%
OpenText AccuRev	1.2%
Other	87.6%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

Sameh-Hablas

CEO - Director General & Founder Ai/ IT Expert - Digital Transformation at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions

Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization

To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is pretty good and is geared towards those with multiple teams who are using it for the same purposes as us."

"In terms of product management, Jira increases productivity and visibility into the product. Those are the top benefits this tool provides to the team. Also, it's accessible to the executives and whoever wants to sign on to Jira to see what's going on."

"This product provides you a good view of the status of your projects."

"We can create multiple boards for the same product backlogs."

"I like that Jira allows you to customize the flow for an agile process and adapt it to your own flow."

"The most valuable features of Jira are the dashboards and user interface."

"The product provides high flexibility to create new workflows quickly."

"It is easy to use and easy to onboard, and it has got a good foundation of offerings for the business requirements if you're working on an agile project or user stories."

More Jira pros

"The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost."

"I have used many solutions throughout my career, but this is the best there is."

"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."

"The solution is very scalable and it's been quite scalable for our organization's purpose."

"Customer Service: Excellent. Our original pre-sales technical contact is now in a different position within the sales organization, but is still willing to field questions, and get the right resources involved to speed up the delivery of customer service."

"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."

"AccuRev is a better tool in general."

"Easy to use on Window platform."

More OpenText AccuRev pros

Cons

"The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat."

"Tracking is important but the built-in features don't meet our needs."

"Of course, the price could always be cheaper."

"I do know the initial setup was pretty complicated. The user interface could be better organized and easier. "

"I have noticed a problem with Jira in the Philippines. In the Philippines, there are only a few companies that offer local support, which is alarming."

"The dashboard reports can be improved. Its dashboard reports are good, but you cannot have complex reports. They are currently very basic. For instance, we can only choose two columns for a dashboard, so it is not friendly enough."

"In terms of what could be improved, it is a bit harder for management or the business partners."

"Its UI can be improved a little bit. I know this a business tool and not a commercial tool, but it could be a little bit more interactive like the HP ALM/Quality Center, which provides you the results of graphs and gives you a lot of visual representations."

More Jira cons

"Stability needs improvement. It has some minor defects that could be improved."

"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code."

"The tool has an issue whereby it restarts its services on its own."

"My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual."

"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."

"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available."

"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."

"Limited reporting features for management."

More OpenText AccuRev cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money."

"The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you."

"We are on an annual license to use Jira."

"For very small companies, if you have less than 10 individuals, it is $10 a year for each of the products. When we were a part of the enterprise and had more than 10 people using it, or before they came up with this solution for small companies, it was $2,500 a year for the license for Jira and Confluence, and I believe something like $600 a year to perpetuate the license. I can't remember if it was $600 or $2,500 annually. It was for up to 25 people at the time, and this was in the early 2000s and mid 2000s."

"One of my customers told me that they were receiving better pricing for a similar tool from Microsoft."

"As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website."

"The pricing for Jira is reasonable, although I think they can bring it down because the plugins cost extra."

"We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

"It is a lower cost than other top competetors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	108
Midsize Enterprise	58
Large Enterprise	151

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 5% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

monday.com vs Jira

Compared 3% of the time

More Jira Competitors

TFS vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 21% of the time

GoCD vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 13% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText AccuRev Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

May 2026

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev

April 2026

Download OpenText AccuRev product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev

Overview

Jira is a comprehensive tool favored by teams for its ability to streamline project management and enhance Agile workflows. Its versatile features, such as customization options and integration capabilities, enable efficient task management and collaboration.

Jira supports Agile methodologies through its adaptability and robust functionalities. Teams benefit from its customizable workflows, enabling seamless integration with third-party applications. Despite its complexity in customization and interface challenges, Jira is invaluable for sprint planning, backlog management, and issue tracking. It provides strong reporting tools, though some users highlight areas for improvement in documentation and stability. It's especially useful for IT, development, and marketing teams to maintain productivity and effective collaboration.

What are the key features of Jira?

Customization: Allows crafting specific workflows and processes tailored to team needs.
Agile Compatibility: Supports Scrum and Kanban boards for efficient Agile practices.
API Integration: Offers robust integration options with numerous plugins and tools.
Reporting Tools: Provides detailed analytics for informed sprint planning and tracking.

What benefits should users expect from Jira?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and teamwork across departments.
Improved Task Management: Streamlines tracking of tasks and issues for projects.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse team requirements through customizable features.
Efficiency: Boosts productivity with support for Agile methodologies.

Jira's implementation in software development and project management sectors underscores its suitability for managing complex projects. Its use extends to QA and marketing for organizing workflows and ensuring effective task distribution. Despite some areas needing refinement, Jira remains integral for teams aiming to boost collaboration and maintain streamlined project processes.

Atlassian

OpenText AccuRev offers a robust and reliable approach to software configuration management, making it an essential tool for teams who prioritize efficient and detailed version control.

OpenText AccuRev stands out due to its stream-based architecture, helping teams manage complex codebases seamlessly. It supports parallel development, facilitating the streamlined management of simultaneous projects. Its scalability ensures seamless adaptation to changing team sizes and project demands.

What are the key features of OpenText AccuRev?

Stream-based architecture: Enables efficient management of branching and merging.
Parallel development: Supports multiple code paths for concurrent project work.
Scalability: Adapts to team size and project complexity effortlessly.
Time-based visualizations: Enhances understanding of project history and changes.
Enterprise-level security: Ensures safe and secure data handling practices.

What benefits should users evaluate in OpenText AccuRev?

Improved team collaboration: Facilitates smooth workflows among development teams.
Increased efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual overhead.
Enhanced control: Offers precise management over project changes and iterations.
Cost savings: Reduces resources needed for managing complex projects.

OpenText AccuRev is implemented across industries like software development, finance, and telecommunications to manage large-scale applications. Its adaptability has made it a go-to option where change management and version control are critical for project success.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev

April 2026

Free Report: Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. OpenText AccuRev report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.