Jira vs Planview AdaptiveWork comparison

Atlassian and Planview are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Atlassian is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Planview is ranked #23. Atlassian holds a 3.9% mindshare in PMS, compared to Planview’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 281 Jira reviews

19,738 Views
5,132 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Planview AdaptiveWork

Read 8 Planview AdaptiveWork reviews

1,934 Views
1,489 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jira

Planview AdaptiveWork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Planview AdaptiveWork and Jira compete in the project management category. Planview AdaptiveWork has an advantage in ease of deployment and customer service attributes, while Jira's comprehensive features justify its higher pricing.

Features: Planview AdaptiveWork offers detailed resource management and transparency functionalities, making it suitable for complex project environments. It supports custom workflows that automate manual tasks, enhancing productivity. Additionally, its collaboration feature allows individuals to see the impact of their decisions on overall projects. Jira provides robust bug tracking and agile workflow capabilities for software development teams. It supports customizable workflows, integrates with various tools, and offers extensive plugin support. Its agile board functionalities enhance sprint planning and task management.

Room for Improvement: Planview AdaptiveWork could improve on integration capabilities to incorporate more project management solutions and enhance existing ones. It can also offer better report customization tools to provide a comprehensive project overview without relying on external tools like Power BI. Additionally, increasing visualization options in its interface could improve project insights. Jira may improve its user interface to be more intuitive for non-technical users. Another improvement area is enhancing its performance, as users have experienced issues under load. Lastly, providing better documentation and tutorials can help users explore its extensive features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview AdaptiveWork provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment process with effective customer support, allowing for quick team onboarding. In contrast, Jira, while powerful, requires a more involved setup due to its extensive customization options. However, Jira is known for its responsive customer service, efficiently resolving user issues.

Pricing and ROI: Planview AdaptiveWork generally presents a higher upfront cost but aims for long-term ROI by providing tailored project management capabilities. On the other hand, Jira offers competitive initial pricing, enhancing development efficiency and collaboration, leading to substantial ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. Planview AdaptiveWork Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Project Management Software

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

281

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (2nd)

Planview AdaptiveWork

Ranking in Project Management Software

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Jira is 3.9%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview AdaptiveWork is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jira	3.9%
Planview AdaptiveWork	1.5%
Other	94.6%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

VishalSingh11

Director BPM at a marketing services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has resources management and timesheets but could be more flexible

Compared to Broadcom Clarity, there was some flexibility with blueprints, etc. You can create a blueprint for different business groups or different customers. Planview AdaptiveWork doesn't have something like that. If they can build up something like a view price. It's still a traditional way where you have to create different instances for different customers. The PPM solution uses queries if I'm rolling out for different divisions. In that case, I have to create different instances for each region because each division may have a different look and feel. But if I have a blueprint, then it's very convenient. I can create multiple interfaces for different processes. Broadcom Clarity has some access control on those viewpoints.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can query the tickets and create dashboards based on these queries."

"We have around 2000 plus users, so scale wise, there are no issues, and we can easily scale up with multiple users."

"Has a good dashboard with good tracking features."

"Based on the flexibility that it offers us, we can adapt to different projects with different cycles."

"The solution offers up great transparency that makes it possible for everyone inside the departmental organization to see what's happening."

"Its integration with Bitbucket, Confluence, and other related products that Atlassian owns is most valuable."

"The solution helps a lot with scrums, is great for development, and the documentation is quite good."

"It has enabled us to keep track of features or projects; previously, we used to manually keep track in Office, and we now have a centralized repository for all the information."

More Jira pros

"I like the project management solution."

"Slide Publisher has been a lifesaver for us; it saves us five to 10 hours a week."

"Provides visibility into employee utilization, progress on specific client projects and a portfolio view of all programs."

"The feature that has improved our project planning the most is the ability to create custom workflows, which allows us to automate manual tasks that project managers need to perform. The collaboration feature enhances our team's productivity by allowing individuals to see the impact of their decisions on projects owned and managed by other teams."

"I like the project management solution. It's really nice."

"Clarizen's reporting features have been critical."

"Clarizen's strength is reporting. Aside from reporting, I also like the ability to create customized workflow and custom actions. The workflow rules are handy. For example, you can create custom fields and dependent picklists."

"Clarizen Slide Publisher has helped increase transparency and communication with project stakeholders for us."

Cons

"The workflow and layout can be confusing and takes a while to get used to."

"The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat."

"Workflow management User permissions Native reporting capabilities in workflow Ticket status, etc"

"The plugin management needs a lot of work."

"It is a bit harder for management or the business partners. I used to search the Atlassian Community online for some troubleshooting issues and I think there were some issues that seemed to not be a big problem for other similar applications, like Microsoft Teams, that were not considered by Jira."

"If you have 70 or 100 stories, it doesn't work to copy and paste or export each one individually."

"Nowadays, many organizations are moving toward the Objectives and Key Results (OKR) framework, and this is something that Jira should be able to accommodate."

"I struggle with Epics, how they are implemented in JIRA, because they don't work like any other Story, I see a list of Epics, but although I can order them, there are some mismatches with how the Epics are used compared to what Scrum expects, or what Story mapping expects an Epic to be."

More Jira cons

"Have struggled with reporting and user adoption."

"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."

"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."

"I felt like the slide publisher isn't that user-friendly. I think it wasn't that easy to use or to figure out because of formatting constraints, or maybe we need to get better at understanding some of its limitations."

"One specific area for improvement could be implementing a development environment to test workflows with live production data."

"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."

"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get really slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you get larger, the pricing becomes very, very steep."

"As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website."

"The price of Jira could be lower."

"Jira and its solution off the shelf are cheap. It is cheap for startups."

"The basic price of Jira is reasonable, but for each plugin, we have to keep paying more. When you add it all up, it can be expensive. The main problem we face is we are forced to purchases plugin licenses for users who are not going to use them. For example, we have Jira licenses for approximately 450 people but if we only want a purchase a plugin for few people it is mandatory to buy the license for the 450 people who have Jira licensees. This is a problem because sometimes we need plugins for the product manager or for people in charge of the report, not everyone. For us, it can be very expensive in the end, they should alter this policy to allow plugins for only a set number of licenses."

"The price of Jira is reasonable."

"The price of the solution could be lower."

"The tool's pricing is expensive. The new pricing is indeed quite expensive compared to what it was a few years ago. Last year, when we intended to renew our subscription, we found the pricing considerably higher."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	108
Midsize Enterprise	58
Large Enterprise	151

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 5% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

monday.com vs Jira

Compared 3% of the time

More Jira Competitors

monday.com vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 7% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 6% of the time

Semantic Space Technologies PPM Studio vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Planview AdaptiveWork

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview AdaptiveWork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

May 2026

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview AdaptiveWork

April 2026

Download Planview AdaptiveWork product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

Planview Clarizen

Overview

Jira is a comprehensive tool favored by teams for its ability to streamline project management and enhance Agile workflows. Its versatile features, such as customization options and integration capabilities, enable efficient task management and collaboration.

Jira supports Agile methodologies through its adaptability and robust functionalities. Teams benefit from its customizable workflows, enabling seamless integration with third-party applications. Despite its complexity in customization and interface challenges, Jira is invaluable for sprint planning, backlog management, and issue tracking. It provides strong reporting tools, though some users highlight areas for improvement in documentation and stability. It's especially useful for IT, development, and marketing teams to maintain productivity and effective collaboration.

What are the key features of Jira?

Customization: Allows crafting specific workflows and processes tailored to team needs.
Agile Compatibility: Supports Scrum and Kanban boards for efficient Agile practices.
API Integration: Offers robust integration options with numerous plugins and tools.
Reporting Tools: Provides detailed analytics for informed sprint planning and tracking.

What benefits should users expect from Jira?

Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates communication and teamwork across departments.
Improved Task Management: Streamlines tracking of tasks and issues for projects.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse team requirements through customizable features.
Efficiency: Boosts productivity with support for Agile methodologies.

Jira's implementation in software development and project management sectors underscores its suitability for managing complex projects. Its use extends to QA and marketing for organizing workflows and ensuring effective task distribution. Despite some areas needing refinement, Jira remains integral for teams aiming to boost collaboration and maintain streamlined project processes.

Atlassian

Planview AdaptiveWork enhances project and resource management through customizable reports and streamlined workflows. Offering transparency and time-saving benefits, it facilitates efficient decision-making with effective management of key metrics and visualizations.

Planview AdaptiveWork is sought after for its comprehensive project and resource management capabilities, offering detailed portfolio visibility and employee utilization tracking. Organizations find value in its reporting features, including customizable dashboards and the Slide Publisher, which streamline presentations and enhance transparency. Automated workflows and collaboration tools reduce manual effort, boosting productivity. However, it lacks the flexibility of competitors like Broadcom Clarity, particularly in catering to diverse business needs. Some users find the interface less intuitive and certain features, such as schedule management and partial automation, pose challenges.

What are the main features of Planview AdaptiveWork?

Project and Resource Management: Enables effective tracking and utilization.
Customizable Dashboards: Enhances insight and transparency in reporting.
Slide Publisher: Simplifies the creation of presentation assets.
Automated Workflows: Increases efficiency by reducing manual tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with other tools to streamline operations.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Improved Decision-Making: Efficiently manages key metrics and visualizations.
Time Savings: Automated features reduce the time spent on routine tasks.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better teamwork through integrated tools.
Transparency: Offers comprehensive views of project portfolios and resources.
Adaptability: Serves various team needs beyond project management.

Planview AdaptiveWork is implemented in sectors focusing on program and portfolio management, proving essential in tracking timesheets and finances with multiple rate cards. It integrates financial data into project plans for accurate forecasting and supports teams with custom workflows for ongoing maintenance. Additionally, it adapts to deliverable tracking and reporting, serving as a robust content repository or library, catering to diverse team requirements in industries beyond conventional project management.

Planview

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Cisco Capital, JLL, Conagra Brands, Cargill, JLL, IBM, IIROC, Siemens Energy

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

April 2026

Free Report: Jira vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. Planview AdaptiveWork and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. Planview AdaptiveWork report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.