Jitterbit Vinyl vs WorkflowGen comparison

Jitterbit and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Jitterbit is ranked #27, while WorkflowGen is ranked #36. Jitterbit holds a 0.6% mindshare in RADS, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jitterbit users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

1,044 Views
877 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

605 Views
236 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Jitterbit Vinyl and WorkflowGen compete in workflow automation. WorkflowGen has the upper hand due to superior features, despite higher costs.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl offers easy integration capabilities, extensive API support, and pricing advantage. WorkflowGen provides flexibility, handles complex workflows efficiently, and offers an advanced feature set suitable for complex automation needs.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Vinyl needs more customization options, enhanced documentation, and usability enhancements. WorkflowGen requires an improved error-handling mechanism, increased scalability, and can present a steeper learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. WorkflowGen offers comprehensive setup guidance but needs more initial configuration, and its deployment is perceived as requiring more technical proficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl is known for competitive pricing and quick ROI. WorkflowGen, while more expensive, delivers long-term value through its extensive capabilities, and users find the overall cost justified by its robust performance and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

27th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

24th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No-Code Development Platforms (16th)

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

36th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

43rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (29th), Business Process Management (BPM) (45th), Process Automation (44th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jitterbit Vinyl	0.6%
WorkflowGen	0.5%
Other	98.9%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2208660

Mobile Dog Product Manager at BioPet Laboratories

It has sped up the app development process, enabling us to release a public version of the app much quicker

Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very scalable from its licensing to design. We have not had any performance issues when scaling."

"It's customizable to whatever you see might use it for... It's very user-friendly, and the front-end is exactly what we need to see, very simple. It can get more complicated too, if those are the needs."

"We have been able to leverage the platform to rapidly build custom solutions, and tailor-make them to our needs."

"You can unite data which lives in different sources without moving that data."

"It's extremely easy to use in getting into the IDE and then back down to your applications, and getting from your applications to your pages, and navigating through all your tables. That's very simple and pretty intuitive."

"It allows us higher visibility into our data, which allows us to data-check faster, and validate data that we had not been able to validate, prior."

"The product has reduced the time that it takes us to produce apps."

"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

Cons

"Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard."

"Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles."

"Upload time of documents that needed to be uploaded was a request that we were having an issue with. That issue got resolved in [near] real time, within probably 30 minutes."

"There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit."

"While some of the reporting functionality is adequate, reporting needs to continue to be worked on, given the fact that there are a lot of really good reporting tools out there."

"When designing the user interface, there are many built-in features; however, Vinyl could use some more extensive design elements that are used in marketing, such as Canva or Web design tools. These would allow for more extensive design elements to be added more easily."

"Version 2.3 has a good UI but we want a more customizable UI."

"During the initial rollout, the text editor wasn't 100% what we were looking for, but we were able to get the job done. After some discussions and finding ways to use different plugins during the short term, Zudy actually came back a few months later and said that they have integrated a standard product into their text editing that checked all the boxes for us."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing costs are approximately 100K annually, and from my perspective, that really is quite the value with the flexibility and what we're getting from the product."

"I feel the product’s pricing is a good value. The licensing model is very straightforward. You license the platform and you can build however many solutions you want with it."

"It is affordable."

"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."

"Compared to if I used traditional methods, such as hiring developers and setting up systems, VINYL is costing me less than half of what it would normally cost."

"Pricing is less than the cost of a consultant and the value you receive is much greater."

"The pricing is moderate. It's okay."

"The value for us for VINYL is that we've got one fee that we're paying per year and we can deploy and build as many apps and bring in as many users as we need."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Consumer Goods Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 55% of the time

QuickBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 45% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 44% of the time

TIBCO Cloud Live Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 30% of the time

Zoho Creator vs WorkflowGen

Compared 26% of the time

More WorkflowGen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

October 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

October 2025

Download WorkflowGen product report

Overview

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen

September 2025

Free Report: Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.