Jitterbit Vinyl vs WorkflowGen comparison

Jitterbit and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Jitterbit is ranked #27, while WorkflowGen is ranked #35. Jitterbit holds a 1.0% mindshare in RADS, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jitterbit users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

1,360 Views
938 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

977 Views
361 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Jitterbit Vinyl and WorkflowGen compete in workflow automation. WorkflowGen has the upper hand due to superior features, despite higher costs.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl offers easy integration capabilities, extensive API support, and pricing advantage. WorkflowGen provides flexibility, handles complex workflows efficiently, and offers an advanced feature set suitable for complex automation needs.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Vinyl needs more customization options, enhanced documentation, and usability enhancements. WorkflowGen requires an improved error-handling mechanism, increased scalability, and can present a steeper learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. WorkflowGen offers comprehensive setup guidance but needs more initial configuration, and its deployment is perceived as requiring more technical proficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl is known for competitive pricing and quick ROI. WorkflowGen, while more expensive, delivers long-term value through its extensive capabilities, and users find the overall cost justified by its robust performance and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

27th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

24th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No-Code Development Platforms (14th)

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

35th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (30th), Business Process Management (BPM) (44th), Process Automation (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jitterbit Vinyl	1.0%
WorkflowGen	0.9%
Other	98.1%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2208660

Mobile Dog Product Manager at BioPet Laboratories

It has sped up the app development process, enabling us to release a public version of the app much quicker

Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the creation of the app and its functions at every step of the way."

"The product has reduced the time that it takes us to produce apps."

"The product is super fast at getting things done."

"You can unite data which lives in different sources without moving that data."

"With the Lite Integration, I didn't to have to disrupt my entire organization to do something. We haven't had to disrupt IT and the business organizations to keep them up and running."

"The way that they've done some of the reports, they've created really great data dumps. If I want to see a snapshot of something in time, for a given timeframe, I can download it. From that download, I can create further analysis or do my own thing with it, which is really helpful. I'm even able to go back several years and get data."

"The integration is a huge accelerator into enabling new business processes. As a small company, we have a few different systems that otherwise couldn't talk to each other. We recognize, from an IT perspective, the value that data and change in status of certain data in one area could influence the ability to take action in another. With these integration points, we are able to essentially create that communication from one system to another, letting system B know that something has been completed or is ready in system A. That allows our users to know that they are ready to complete a task. Without that, we would be relying on a lot of manual communication. We would be relying on individuals sending emails, saying, "Hey, by the way, this is ready in system A." Now, we have the system recognizing it and shooting that email off automatically, with all the instructions necessary."

"App development, database storage, and 3rd party app integrations are great."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

Cons

"Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles."

"Once or twice, when a new version of VINYL comes out, it has had a negative impact on a feature. However, we do everything in a test environment. Unless we miss something in test, we don't go live with it if it isn't perfect. Zudy hasn't had too many stumbles along the way, but there have been a couple times, and it's been minor."

"Right now it's very dependent on having an imagination to understand."

"Some new features I think I'd like to see is visibility into running jobs so that we can see what the status is, or it's not stuck in its process and doing its thing, or how much longer it's going to take. I'd also like to see a native calendaring function so we can put calendars into our apps with maybe even recurring tasks or appointments and that sort of thing. We'd also like to see multi-select lists. The users being able to pick multiple things to filter on and get a list and be able to export that list."

"The interface has had a lot of changes to it. It is better than it was before. However, with the subqueries in particular, this has been the most difficult part of the interface."

"The documentation isn't everything it could be, and the user forum is not always the most helpful."

"Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard."

"I sometimes find formatting tricky to get the front end of an app the way I want it."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing and licensing are on par with or better than what we were looking at and what we had. That was also one of the key factors for making the decision. We cut our costs in half by going over to the Zudy platform."

"Pricing and licensing are expensive."

"Our licensing costs are approximately 100K annually, and from my perspective, that really is quite the value with the flexibility and what we're getting from the product."

"The key thing here is that the pricing is just one price. We can do as much or as little with the product as we want to which is very attractive. I don't have to worry about if I build a new app, I have to pay more. Or, if I put 20 more people logging into the app, I don't have to pay any extra for that either."

"It is affordable."

"The pricing is moderate. It's okay."

"Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it."

"I feel the product’s pricing is a good value. The licensing model is very straightforward. You license the platform and you can build however many solutions you want with it."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

Consumer Goods Company

Comms Service Provider

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 14% of the time

QuickBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 12% of the time

Temenos Quantum vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 11% of the time

Retool vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 9% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 7% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 14% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs WorkflowGen

Compared 9% of the time

Bonita vs WorkflowGen

Compared 9% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs WorkflowGen

Compared 9% of the time

Studio Creatio vs WorkflowGen

Compared 6% of the time

More WorkflowGen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

January 2026

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

January 2026

Download WorkflowGen product report

Overview

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen

December 2025

Free Report: Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.