Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WorkflowGen Logo

Top 10 WorkflowGen Alternatives

Vendor: WorkflowGen
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top WorkflowGen Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WorkflowGen based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Microsoft Power Apps, and Appian. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

WorkflowGen Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WorkflowGen, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WorkflowGen Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Camunda excels in integration flexibility and developer support, making it ideal for tech-savvy teams. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers comprehensive features and personalized service, appealing to businesses seeking thorough workflow management and support. Camunda's lower costs benefit cost-conscious organizations, while WorkflowGen targets feature-rich needs.
Download Camunda vs. WorkflowGen Report
Camunda has a lower initial setup cost, offering affordability, while WorkflowGen demands a higher setup fee, reflecting its extensive features.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda has a lower initial setup cost, offering affordability, while WorkflowGen demands a higher setup fee, reflecting its extensive features.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
Microsoft Power Apps
3.9 out of 5
WorkflowGen offers comprehensive process management and scalability, ideal for larger organizations needing detailed oversight. In comparison, Microsoft Power Apps provides strong integration and customization features. Microsoft Power Apps ensures quicker deployment and support with flexible pricing, appealing to organizations seeking rapid adaptation and quicker ROI.
Download Microsoft Power Apps vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen setup costs are often transparent and predictable, while Microsoft Power Apps may present variable costs due to customization needs. The streamlined cost structure of WorkflowGen contrasts with the potentially fluctuating expenses associated with Microsoft Power Apps.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen setup costs are often transparent and predictable, while Microsoft Power Apps may present variable costs due to customization needs. The streamlined cost structure of WorkflowGen contrasts with the potentially fluctuating expenses associated with Microsoft Power Apps.
WorkflowGen Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Appian offers superior scalability and integration for business process automation, making it ideal for diverse ecosystems. In comparison, WorkflowGen provides extensive customization options, appealing to businesses seeking tailored solutions. Appian's initial higher investment is offset by long-term ROI, while WorkflowGen presents a cost-effective setup.
Download Appian vs. WorkflowGen Report
Appian offers a straightforward setup at a higher initial cost, while WorkflowGen provides a more budget-friendly setup option with potentially fewer upfront custom features.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian offers a straightforward setup at a higher initial cost, while WorkflowGen provides a more budget-friendly setup option with potentially fewer upfront custom features.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager
4.1 out of 5
SAP Signavio Process Manager excels in collaborative modeling and offers attractive pricing. In comparison, WorkflowGen delivers strong automation capabilities with extensive customization options. SAP Signavio's intuitive deployment and support cater to rapid onboarding; meanwhile, WorkflowGen’s features justify its initial setup costs.
Download SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. WorkflowGen Report
SAP Signavio Process Manager offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while WorkflowGen involves a more complex setup with potentially higher expenses. The difference in setup processes highlights varying levels of initial investment required for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Signavio Process Manager offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while WorkflowGen involves a more complex setup with potentially higher expenses. The difference in setup processes highlights varying levels of initial investment required for each solution.
WorkflowGen Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Pega Platform is ideal for complex needs with robust features and AI integration. In comparison, WorkflowGen appeals to those valuing quick deployment and simplicity. Buyers might prefer Pega for customization and WorkflowGen for ease of use and cost-effectiveness.
Download Pega Platform vs. WorkflowGen Report
Pega Platform offers higher setup costs compared to WorkflowGen, known for its more budget-friendly initial expenses. Pega often includes more complex integrations, while WorkflowGen caters to straightforward setups, emphasizing clear distinctions in deployment investments.
View comparison
Pricing
Pega Platform offers higher setup costs compared to WorkflowGen, known for its more budget-friendly initial expenses. Pega often includes more complex integrations, while WorkflowGen caters to straightforward setups, emphasizing clear distinctions in deployment investments.
WorkflowGen Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Bizagi's intuitive design and strong process modeling are appreciated by users. In comparison, WorkflowGen's flexibility in handling complex workflows and integration capabilities makes it attractive. Bizagi's cost-effectiveness is noted, while WorkflowGen's advanced functionalities justify its higher price, offering compelling ROI for tech buyers.
Download Bizagi vs. WorkflowGen Report
Bizagi offers competitive setup costs, while WorkflowGen's setup costs are typically higher, reflecting their broader feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Bizagi offers competitive setup costs, while WorkflowGen's setup costs are typically higher, reflecting their broader feature set.
WorkflowGen Logo
Mendix
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Mendix
4.1 out of 5
Mendix suits those seeking drag-and-drop capability and integration flexibility. In comparison, WorkflowGen's advanced process automation and detailed workflow customization are advantageous. Mendix excels in deployment and customer service ease, while WorkflowGen's higher initial costs are justified by long-term benefits.
Download Mendix vs. WorkflowGen Report
Mendix has a higher setup cost compared to WorkflowGen, making WorkflowGen a more cost-effective initial choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Mendix has a higher setup cost compared to WorkflowGen, making WorkflowGen a more cost-effective initial choice.
WorkflowGen Logo
OutSystems
4.2 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
OutSystems
4.2 out of 5
OutSystems is known for its rapid application development, drag-and-drop functionality, and pre-built templates. In comparison, WorkflowGen excels in integration capabilities and powerful workflow customization. OutSystems focuses on speed and usability, while WorkflowGen stands out for flexibility and tailored workflows.
Download OutSystems vs. WorkflowGen Report
OutSystems has a higher setup cost compared to WorkflowGen, making WorkflowGen a more budget-friendly option for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
OutSystems has a higher setup cost compared to WorkflowGen, making WorkflowGen a more budget-friendly option for initial setup.
WorkflowGen Logo
ARIS BPA
4.2 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
ARIS BPA
4.2 out of 5
ARIS BPA excels in process modeling and analytics, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers ease of use and flexibility, suitable for dynamic operations. ARIS BPA's cost-effectiveness suits long-term analysis, while WorkflowGen provides higher efficiency and ROI over time.
Download ARIS BPA vs. WorkflowGen Report
ARIS BPA offers a high initial setup cost, while WorkflowGen provides a more moderate setup fee, highlighting their different approaches to onboarding users.
View comparison
Pricing
ARIS BPA offers a high initial setup cost, while WorkflowGen provides a more moderate setup fee, highlighting their different approaches to onboarding users.
WorkflowGen Logo
Bonita
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Bonita
4.1 out of 5
Bonita excels in integration simplicity ideal for budget-conscious buyers, focusing on competitive pricing and seamless adaptability. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers superior modeling flexibility and structured support, appealing to larger enterprises seeking advanced features and justifying a higher investment with enhanced ROI potential.
Download Bonita vs. WorkflowGen Report
Bonita has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while WorkflowGen involves higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Bonita has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while WorkflowGen involves higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
Nintex Process Platform
3.9 out of 5
Nintex offers ease of use with drag-and-drop simplicity and robust integration for accessible automation. In comparison, WorkflowGen provides extensive customization and complex workflow support, appealing to enterprises needing detailed process control for tailored process management solutions.
Download Nintex Process Platform vs. WorkflowGen Report
Nintex Process Platform has a higher setup cost, while WorkflowGen offers a more affordable setup. These pricing differences highlight varying initial investment expectations between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Nintex Process Platform has a higher setup cost, while WorkflowGen offers a more affordable setup. These pricing differences highlight varying initial investment expectations between the two platforms.
WorkflowGen Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
3.9 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
3.9 out of 5

WorkflowGen offers favorable pricing and deployment ease, appealing to businesses prioritizing cost and flexibility. In comparison, SS&C Blue Prism's advanced AI and machine learning features attract those who value comprehensive automation capabilities, despite higher initial investment and complex setup.

Download SS&C Blue Prism vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen has a straightforward setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious users, while SS&C Blue Prism requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has a straightforward setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious users, while SS&C Blue Prism requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
ServiceNow Now Platform
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen is praised for ease of deployment and customer service, while ServiceNow Now Platform excels with comprehensive features despite higher pricing. WorkflowGen offers customizable workflows, but ServiceNow Now Platform provides AI-driven automation and extensive integrations. WorkflowGen's competitive pricing attracts small to mid-sized businesses; in comparison, ServiceNow Now Platform's advanced features appeal to larger enterprises.
Download ServiceNow Now Platform vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen has a significantly lower setup cost compared to ServiceNow Now Platform, making it more accessible for small businesses. In contrast, ServiceNow Now Platform incurs higher initial expenses, justifying this with more extensive features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has a significantly lower setup cost compared to ServiceNow Now Platform, making it more accessible for small businesses. In contrast, ServiceNow Now Platform incurs higher initial expenses, justifying this with more extensive features and capabilities.
WorkflowGen Logo
QuickBase
4.5 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
QuickBase
4.5 out of 5
QuickBase excels in customization and scalability, ideal for businesses needing tailored solutions. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers extensive integration capabilities and advanced scripting options, suitable for complex IT environments. QuickBase ensures easy deployment. WorkflowGen, despite higher setup costs, provides value with its comprehensive features.
Download QuickBase vs. WorkflowGen Report
QuickBase generally has higher setup costs compared to WorkflowGen, which often requires a smaller investment for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
QuickBase generally has higher setup costs compared to WorkflowGen, which often requires a smaller investment for initial setup.
WorkflowGen Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen stands out for its ease of use and quick deployment. In comparison, Studio Creatio excels with comprehensive features and higher long-term value. WorkflowGen's cost-effectiveness appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Studio Creatio is preferred for its extensive customization and superior customer service.
Download Studio Creatio vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen has a higher setup cost compared to Studio Creatio, which offers more budget-friendly options.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has a higher setup cost compared to Studio Creatio, which offers more budget-friendly options.
WorkflowGen Logo
KiSSFLOW
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
KiSSFLOW
4.3 out of 5
KiSSFLOW attracts users with its intuitive drag-and-drop interface and easy setup using pre-built templates. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers advanced customization and robust integration for complex workflows. KiSSFLOW is cost-effective for straightforward needs, while WorkflowGen provides long-term ROI through extensive capabilities.
Download KiSSFLOW vs. WorkflowGen Report
KiSSFLOW's setup costs are minimal and more affordable, while WorkflowGen's setup costs are higher and may be less budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
KiSSFLOW's setup costs are minimal and more affordable, while WorkflowGen's setup costs are higher and may be less budget-friendly.
WorkflowGen Logo
AgilePoint
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
AgilePoint
4.1 out of 5
AgilePoint offers cost advantages and responsive support, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking quick ROI and broad integration. In comparison, WorkflowGen excels with advanced customizability and extensive API capabilities, appealing to users desiring superior functionality and detailed deployment guidance despite higher costs.
Download AgilePoint vs. WorkflowGen Report
AgilePoint has a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while WorkflowGen's higher setup cost offers additional advanced features for a premium experience.
View comparison
Pricing
AgilePoint has a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while WorkflowGen's higher setup cost offers additional advanced features for a premium experience.
WorkflowGen Logo
Temenos Quantum
3.6 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Temenos Quantum
3.6 out of 5
Temenos Quantum excels in functionality and integration, making it a robust option. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers flexibility with customizable workflows, catering to diverse business needs. While Temenos Quantum ensures comprehensive features at a higher cost, WorkflowGen's cost-effectiveness appeals to budget-conscious buyers.
Download Temenos Quantum vs. WorkflowGen Report
Temenos Quantum has a relatively high setup cost, while WorkflowGen offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Temenos Quantum has a relatively high setup cost, while WorkflowGen offers a more affordable setup option.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service
4.0 out of 5

WorkflowGen excels in intuitive design and seamless integration. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers extensive customization and robust data management. WorkflowGen is ideal for those seeking ease of use, while Oracle attracts enterprises requiring advanced customization and flexibility.

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, with significant differences influencing the initial investment required.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, with significant differences influencing the initial investment required.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
Boomi AtomSphere Flow
3.9 out of 5
WorkflowGen is known for its ease of deployment and affordability, featuring a robust form builder and process automation capabilities. In comparison, Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers extensive integration options and scalability. WorkflowGen excels in deployment and cost-effectiveness, while Boomi provides superior integration and complex needs versatility.
Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen has a higher setup cost compared to Boomi AtomSphere Flow, making the latter a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has a higher setup cost compared to Boomi AtomSphere Flow, making the latter a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
WorkflowGen Logo
Zoho Creator
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Zoho Creator
4.3 out of 5
Zoho Creator offers easy customization and a drag-and-drop interface, making it ideal for rapid application building. In comparison, WorkflowGen provides robust workflow automation and advanced integration features. Zoho Creator is budget-friendly, while WorkflowGen, although pricier, delivers strong ROI through comprehensive capabilities.
Download WorkflowGen vs. Zoho Creator Report
Zoho Creator has a low setup cost with easy onboarding, while WorkflowGen requires a higher setup investment but provides robust customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
Zoho Creator has a low setup cost with easy onboarding, while WorkflowGen requires a higher setup investment but provides robust customization options.
WorkflowGen Logo
Jitterbit Vinyl
4.4 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Jitterbit Vinyl
4.4 out of 5
Jitterbit Vinyl offers user-friendly integration tools and extensive connectivity options. In comparison, WorkflowGen provides dynamic form generation and comprehensive task management. Jitterbit Vinyl needs system customization and reporting enhancements. WorkflowGen requires better mobile app support. Jitterbit Vinyl features cost-effective pricing; WorkflowGen justifies a higher price with robust features.
Download Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen Report
Jitterbit Vinyl offers a transparent setup cost structure, while WorkflowGen requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Jitterbit Vinyl offers a transparent setup cost structure, while WorkflowGen requires a higher initial investment.
WorkflowGen Logo
CMW Tracker
4.8 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
CMW Tracker
4.8 out of 5
CMW Tracker is favored for its affordable pricing and straightforward deployment, offering ease of use. In comparison, WorkflowGen stands out for its superior integration capabilities and extensive customization, appealing to businesses seeking advanced features despite higher initial costs.
Download CMW Tracker vs. WorkflowGen Report
CMW Tracker has a straightforward setup cost, while WorkflowGen's setup process involves additional expenses and complexities, highlighting a cost-efficient start with CMW Tracker compared to the potentially higher initial investment needed for WorkflowGen.
View comparison
Pricing
CMW Tracker has a straightforward setup cost, while WorkflowGen's setup process involves additional expenses and complexities, highlighting a cost-efficient start with CMW Tracker compared to the potentially higher initial investment needed for WorkflowGen.
WorkflowGen Logo
Adobe ColdFusion
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Adobe ColdFusion
4.3 out of 5
Adobe ColdFusion provides rapid application development and integration options, attracting users focused on web applications. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers advanced workflow and forms management, appealing to those prioritizing workflow automation. Adobe ColdFusion's deployment is straightforward, while WorkflowGen allows flexible yet complex setups.
Download Adobe ColdFusion vs. WorkflowGen Report
Adobe ColdFusion setup cost is higher compared to WorkflowGen's more affordable setup cost. WorkflowGen is generally seen as more cost-effective for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe ColdFusion setup cost is higher compared to WorkflowGen's more affordable setup cost. WorkflowGen is generally seen as more cost-effective for initial setup.
WorkflowGen Logo
WaveMaker
4.0 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
WaveMaker
4.0 out of 5
WorkflowGen offers intuitive process design and robust automation, making it ideal for process management. In comparison, WaveMaker excels in rapid application development with a versatile drag-and-drop interface. WorkflowGen demands a higher cost for significant process improvements, while WaveMaker ensures quick, cost-effective app development and deployment.
WorkflowGen has minimal setup costs, while WaveMaker requires substantial upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has minimal setup costs, while WaveMaker requires substantial upfront investment.
WorkflowGen Logo
PMG
1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
PMG
1 out of 5

PMG is a worldwide digital company that helps businesses to connect better with people. They use a special software called Alli to offer different services like planning media strategies, making creative marketing campaigns, and building helpful software.

View comparison
WorkflowGen Logo
Alpha Anywhere
4.0 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Alpha Anywhere
4.0 out of 5
WorkflowGen excels in usability, handling complex processes seamlessly, while Alpha Anywhere offers extensive features like offline functionality and cross-platform flexibility. In comparison, WorkflowGen's competitive pricing benefits small businesses, whereas Alpha Anywhere's higher cost justifies its scalability and versatile ROI.
Download Alpha Anywhere vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen has a higher setup cost compared to Alpha Anywhere. Alpha Anywhere offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has a higher setup cost compared to Alpha Anywhere. Alpha Anywhere offers a more affordable initial setup.
WorkflowGen Logo
Pillir
5.0 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Pillir
5.0 out of 5
WorkflowGen's flexible integrations and ease of use are ideal for those prioritizing straightforward deployment. In comparison, Pillir excels in SAP environments with rapid app development and offline functionality. WorkflowGen's user-friendly interface contrasts Pillir's higher initial cost, justifying its value through robust SAP-specific features.
Download Pillir vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen offers moderate setup costs, whereas Pillir offers a more affordable setup. Pillir's lower initial investment contrasts with WorkflowGen's higher cost, making it a budget-friendly option for startups.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen offers moderate setup costs, whereas Pillir offers a more affordable setup. Pillir's lower initial investment contrasts with WorkflowGen's higher cost, making it a budget-friendly option for startups.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
TIBCO Cloud Live Apps
1 out of 5
TIBCO Cloud Live Apps is a low-code application platform that enables Citizen Developers to turn an idea into a business application with no code. Using an intuitive Case Management approach the Citizen Developer can create applications that have enough structure to meet business needs but are flexible enough to not constrain them in the way they want to use it. Some subscriptions to Live Apps also include capabilities from the Integration domain meaning the Citizen Developer can create applications that integrate and interact with a wide range of Enterprise data systems on cloud or on-premise.
View comparison

Related categories

Business Process Design
Business Process Management (BPM)
Process Automation