Camunda vs WorkflowGen comparison

Camunda and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while WorkflowGen is ranked #28. Camunda holds a 9.0% mindshare in BPD, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,866 Views
5,425 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

1,198 Views
228 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Camunda and WorkflowGen are competing products in the business process management category. Camunda has the upper hand in pricing and support, while WorkflowGen stands out for its features.

Features: Camunda offers flexibility through its open-source framework, extensive process automation capabilities, and comprehensive integration support. It provides excellent scalability suited for diverse environments. WorkflowGen includes an advanced form designer, robust workflow engine, and user-friendly interface, designed for business users seeking ready-to-use solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda provides flexible deployment, supporting cloud and on-premise setups, with community-driven support enhancing user satisfaction. WorkflowGen's deployment is straightforward, with dedicated customer support ensuring a smooth setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda offers lower setup costs with its open-source model, appealing to businesses focused on cost-effectiveness and customization potential. WorkflowGen's higher initial investment is justified by its extensive features, offering long-term value and dedicated support.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. WorkflowGen

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

1st

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (3rd), AI Customer Support (51st), AI IT Support (5th)

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Business Process Design

28th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

44th

Ranking in Process Automation

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (34th), Low-Code Development Platforms (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 9.0%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	9.0%
WorkflowGen	0.8%
Other	90.2%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."

"The flexibility is great."

"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."

"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."

"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."

"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."

"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."

"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."

More Camunda pros

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

Cons

"The setup process is a drawback as it has many dependencies, which affects our ability to migrate to Windows eleven due to security concerns."

"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."

"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."

"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."

"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."

More Camunda cons

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is decent. Everything is included in the license. The Community version is also good to start with. We are using the Community version."

"The most attractive feature of the product is that it is open source."

"We have an annual subscription to this solution."

"I use the open-source free version."

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

"There is a bit of scope for improvement in how the licensing and pricing are done. They are based on the number of processing instances you execute on the cluster... but on the self-hosted mode, the pricing model should be customized."

"There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly the same as in the enterprise version."

"In Africa, the cost of deployment is an important factor to consider since it adds to the overall cost. This might be the only drawback to using it."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 8% of the time

Bonita vs WorkflowGen

Compared 7% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs WorkflowGen

Compared 6% of the time

Zoho Creator vs WorkflowGen

Compared 6% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs WorkflowGen

Compared 5% of the time

More WorkflowGen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

January 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

January 2026

Download WorkflowGen product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

WorkflowGen

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. WorkflowGen

February 2026

Free Report: Camunda vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.