


ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are competitors in the cybersecurity space. Comparatively, ThreatLocker offers more customizable options while Kaspersky provides advanced threat protection backed by global threat intelligence.
Features: ThreatLocker offers granular application control, endpoint protection, and adaptive learning, enabling tailored security measures. Kaspersky excels with robust malware protection, data encryption, and centralized management for comprehensive cybersecurity. ThreatLocker focuses on flexibility and customization, while Kaspersky emphasizes thorough threat detection.
Room for Improvement: ThreatLocker could enhance granularity in options and simplify user access. Longer deployment time for complex environments might be reduced. Kaspersky may further streamline its configuration process and improve its initial guidance, while expanding features for seamless integration with existing IT structures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatLocker allows quick deployment with responsive support, seamlessly integrating with existing systems. Kaspersky offers a detailed guided setup, requiring more initial configuration but ensuring robust support and thorough integration.
Pricing and ROI: ThreatLocker presents competitive pricing with lower initial costs, focused on flexibility and long-term ROI. Kaspersky, though initially more expensive, delivers value with an extensive feature set and strategic ROI through ongoing threat mitigation. Organizations may find immediate cost benefits with ThreatLocker, but expansive coverage with Kaspersky aligns with long-term cybersecurity investments.
With Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks' incident correlation, behavioral detection, and process tree visibility, similar initial triage can often be completed in roughly 10 to 20 minutes, depending on the incident.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
They should start offering sessions if there's some critical error occurring, even if someone has to pay for the support.
We contacted support, and they answered all questions.
The technical support is nice and professional.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
If you assign a device to a user in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, you cannot reassign it to another user.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
When a Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks incident is confirmed, it would be useful to automatically create a ServiceNow or Jira ticket with the incident summary, including affected endpoints, user indicators, process tree, severity, and recommended response actions.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
Recently, there was a company which was attacked by phishing emails, and out of 10, it was only blocking three emails.
Changes occur without notification or updates from the Kaspersky team, making it difficult to prepare for modifications.
Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations could be improved if it depended more on artificial intelligence.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
Endpoint Detection and Response functionality includes root cause analysis and device isolation.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is one of the best, very effective software because of its vulnerability assessment and threat assessments.
We contacted support, and they answered all questions.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform | 8.7% |
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 9.9% |
| Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations | 4.8% |
| Other | 76.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 48 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers robust cybersecurity with features like malware detection and cloud-based endpoint management, suitable for businesses requiring advanced protection.
This solution provides comprehensive endpoint security, including a self-protection mechanism, EDR service, and integration with Microsoft Office 365. It supports multiple operating systems with components like Web Control, Device Control, and BitLocker encryption. Anti-phishing and anti-malware features, alongside detailed vulnerability assessments, enhance its security capabilities. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement in deployment, update management, and resource usage. Challenges include high CPU usage, installation delays, and stability issues. Companies benefit from features like ransomware protection and cloud platform integration, ensuring protection against threats.
What are the most important features of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud?Companies in sectors such as automation and insurance implement Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud for its advanced cybersecurity features. They rely on its capabilities for application blocking, web and email threat defense, and compliance with data protection standards. By leveraging endpoint management and behavior analysis, organizations integrate this tool with cloud platforms to secure servers, workstations, and mobile devices.
Gain proactive, industry leading Zero Trust cybersecurity capabilities with ThreatLocker. By employing a deny-by-default approach, you will greatly enhance your security and operational efficiency. Solutions from ThreatLocker are focused on precise application control and
streamlined access management without administrative rights.
ThreatLocker Application Control solutions include Zero Trust Alllowlisting, Zero Trust Ringfencing and Privilege Access Management, significantly reducing any unauthorized software activities in your environment. Granular controls improve your overall security, while ringfencing enhances application behavior monitoring. Elevation requests will allow users to gain administrative access without IT intervention. The platform's ease of policy management and real-time threat visibility contribute to reduced help desk tickets and operational costs, ensuring protection against ransomware and
unauthorized applications.
What are the key features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform?
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
Organizations often deploy ThreatLocker to ensure endpoint security in industries requiring stringent application control and administrative access management. Its functionalities are critical for managing Shadow IT, creating policies, and overseeing software installation approvals. Common usage spans sectors demanding robust security and compliance, such as finance and healthcare, where maintaining high
security and efficiency is crucial.
We monitor all Ransomware Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.