Kiteworks vs Progress ShareFile comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Kiteworks and Progress Software are both solutions in the Content Collaboration Platforms category. Kiteworks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #11. Kiteworks holds a 2.7% mindshare in CCP, compared to Progress Software’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

6,246 Views
1,124 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Progress ShareFile

Read 11 Progress ShareFile reviews

4,086 Views
2,492 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Progress ShareFile

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2026

Kiteworks and Progress ShareFile are secure file sharing and collaboration solutions. Kiteworks has an advantage in pricing and support, while Progress ShareFile is preferred for its advanced features.

Features: Kiteworks offers secure file sharing with built-in tracking, automated file management, and a private content network. Progress ShareFile provides robust integration capabilities, advanced security measures, and the ease of use for end users.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could benefit from enhanced integration with external tools, a more streamlined user interface, and expanded mobile access. Progress ShareFile might improve its scalability, offer more cost-effective pricing, and enhance its hybrid deployment capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks supports flexible deployment models across cloud, on-premises, or hybrid environments with responsive support. Progress ShareFile offers straightforward cloud deployment with comprehensive training resources, emphasizing simplicity and training support.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks provides competitive pricing focusing on long-term cost-effectiveness with scalable solutions. Progress ShareFile might have higher initial costs but offers significant ROI for businesses using its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Progress ShareFile Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Progress ShareFile

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Email Security (27th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (7th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

Progress ShareFile

Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

eSignature (Electronic Signature) (10th), Cloud Data Exchange Services (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 2.7%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Progress ShareFile is 5.4%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Content Collaboration Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ShareFile	5.4%
Kiteworks	2.7%
Other	91.9%

Content Collaboration Platforms

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

David Donaldson

Regional Information Technology Director at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Flexible plans, stable, and scalable

I used another solution at the same time, which was far worse. The American company I worked for used a similar file-sharing solution called LeapFile, a secure file transfer service. Personally, I found Citrix ShareFile to be much better than LeapFile, which was quite clunky. I later used a solution called Egnyte, which my company used as its main file transfer solution, though I'm not sure if it's still in use. The company moved to Egnyte because it is more of an enterprise-level solution. Egnyte was expensive, but it worked. I believe Citrix ShareFile is aimed at smaller to medium-sized organizations, making it a more appropriate solution than Egnyte due to its pricing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"Kiteworks is easy to manage and maintain with a user-friendly interface and I recommend it to anyone that requires a file-sharing system that supports SFTP."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"As a file-sharing application, it's an absolute 10 out of 10."

"The most useful feature of this solution is to share files with external parties and we can use this functionality to share files internally too."

"Scalability is impressive."

More Kiteworks pros

"The solution would query the Active Directory, and if new accounts were identified, Citrix ShareFile would add them automatically."

"It's an enterprise-scalable product with security."

"It provided end users with a secure file-sharing option with which they can share big files."

"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."

"Easy to setup across the enterprise with Active Directory support for better managed security."

"We implement this solution at many customer sites which directly affects productivity and gives the customer a very flexible solution."

"ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution."

"Easy to manage and fully secure."

More Progress ShareFile pros

Cons

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"There is one particular thing that is a nuisance."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

More Kiteworks cons

"The user interface is not very intuitive."

"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode."

"DLP features are lacking and required because, especially with everyone working from home, security is now paramount when the data is on BYOD devices."

"Everything they have should be integrated into one item."

"Reporting features could be better Support could be better; we don't usually need it but I have read a number of complaints from users with more complex implementations (API use, AD integration) that have had issues."

"Would like more granular folder ownership administration."

"They should integrate the solution with more email services."

"Deployment by vendor was not done right. We were looking for a HA solution but it is not configured like that."

More Progress ShareFile cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"You have to work hard in order to get the suitable licenses."

"I give the cost of the solution a five out of five."

"If you are already a Citrix customer, I recommend having the Platinum licensing level, as it provides licensing for a number of various features that all integrate together."

"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Seclore Email Encryption vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs Progress ShareFile

Compared 10% of the time

Dropbox Business - Enterprise vs Progress ShareFile

Compared 8% of the time

Egnyte vs Progress ShareFile

Compared 8% of the time

Google Workspace vs Progress ShareFile

Compared 7% of the time

Google Drive Enterprise vs Progress ShareFile

Compared 6% of the time

More Progress ShareFile Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

October 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Progress ShareFile

September 2026

Download Progress ShareFile product report

Also Known As

Accellion

Citrix RightSignature, Citrix ShareFile

Overview

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Kiteworks

Progress® ShareFile® AI-powered document collaboration platform is designed to help businesses run client work from start to finish—securely, efficiently and with less friction.

Built for organizations that handle sensitive information—such as accounting, legal and financial services—ShareFile software goes beyond traditional file transfer tools to support a more connected, end-to-end client experience. From document collection and collaboration to approvals, e-signatures and secure storage, ShareFile software unifies key stages of client work in a single, secure platform.

With ShareFile, teams can securely share files, manage document workflows and collaborate with clients through branded client portals—while helping maintain visibility into documents, requests and client interactions. Instead of juggling disconnected tools, businesses can streamline processes, reduce manual work and create more consistent, professional client experiences.

ShareFile combines secure file transfer, client portals, document workflow automation and e-signature capabilities into one solution, helping teams move work faster, while helping organizations manage sensitive data.

Key capabilities include:

Secure file sharing and large file transfer with encrypted email and attachments

Client portals for structured, branded collaboration and document exchange

Document workflow automation for intake, approvals, onboarding and repeatable processes

Built-in e-signature, forms and approvals to help complete work without switching tools

AI-powered document automation, including intake, summarization and instant Q&A

Granular permissions, audit trails and governance controls to help improve visibility and support compliance efforts

Advanced security features, including encryption in transit and at rest, plus tools that support secure client interactions

By unifying people, processes and data into a single platform, ShareFile software helps reduce tool sprawl and enables teams to scale client work without increasing complexity. Benefits can include improved efficiency, more consistent client experiences and stronger operational outcomes.

ShareFile software is a modern alternative to legacy FTP systems and basic file-sharing tools—purpose-built to help organizations run client work end-to-end, improve client experiences and operate with greater confidence.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

SecondMarket, KBC Partners, Twilio, You Know Who Design, oDesk Corporation, CMT Agency, Townhog

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Progress ShareFile

September 2026

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Progress ShareFile

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Progress ShareFile and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. Progress ShareFile report.

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.