Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kovair Intelligent DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management comparison

Kovair and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Kovair is ranked #24, while OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Kovair holds a 1.0% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.
Kovair Intelligent DevOps
  • 285 Views
  • 285 Comparison Views
OpenText Application Qualit...
Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews
  • 5,872 Views
  • 3,523 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Application Quality Management and Kovair Intelligent DevOps compete in enhancing software development processes. Kovair stands out due to its superior features and adaptability for deployment.

Features: OpenText Application Quality Management provides comprehensive test management, defect tracking, and enhances quality assurance. Kovair Intelligent DevOps offers robust continuous integration, delivery capabilities, and strong collaboration tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management offers straightforward deployment and dependable customer service. Kovair Intelligent DevOps provides a flexible deployment model with integrated support, offering agility in managing complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management has moderate setup costs with favorable ROI, known for its affordability. Kovair Intelligent DevOps involves a higher initial investment but yields substantial ROI by optimizing development efficiencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kovair Intelligent DevOps
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
24th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Application Qualit...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
208
Ranking in other categories
Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Kovair Intelligent DevOps is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 4.6%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management4.6%
Kovair Intelligent DevOps1.0%
Other94.4%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Use Kovair Intelligent DevOps?
Leave a review
GS
Greg Stone
Partner at IS Nordic AS
Manages multiple releases seamlessly
We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Performing Arts
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise162
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Rally Software vs Kovair Intelligent DevOps Logo
Rally Software vs Kovair Intelligent DevOps
Compared 51% of the time
PTC Integrity vs Kovair Intelligent DevOps Logo
PTC Integrity vs Kovair Intelligent DevOps
Compared 25% of the time
More Kovair Intelligent DevOps Competitors
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 13% of the time
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 9% of the time
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 9% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 8% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Application Quality Management
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
December 2025
Kovair Intelligent DevOps reportDownload Kovair Intelligent DevOps product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Application Quality Management
January 2026
OpenText Application Quality Management reportDownload OpenText Application Quality Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager
 

Overview

Kovair Intelligent DevOps with its SOA architected proprietary ESB-based Omnibus engine and tool specific adapters and plugins; can seamlessly integrate tools for data synchronizing across the toolchain. Kovair Omnibus also possesses the unique capability of integrating in-house tools of an organization. This keeps all project stakeholders, managers, developers, testers, and operations team on the same page of information; ensuring traceable artifacts, continuous integration, on-time delivery with uncompromised quality.

Kovair connects to 75+ multi-vendor, legacy, open source tools that are frequently used by DevOps teams. Some of the benefits of using Kovair Intelligent DevOps platform are as follows —

- Real-time collaboration between development, delivery, and operations tools

- Clear management visibility with total metrics and drill-down analytics

- Plug-and-play tool integration flexibility- anytime, anywhere even for homegrown tools

- Continuous support from requirement gathering to agile development to production deployment

- Cross-tool traceability providing better release predictability and Change impact analysis

- Continuous Testing through workflow based automatic triggering of both manual & automated test cases

- Schedule based test automation script execution enabling Continuous Delivery

- Continuous monitoring of release quality through reports and dashboards

    Product Highlights

    - Out-of-the-Box Reports for Release, Build, and Deployment

    - Kovair Omnibus Integration Platform

      More details - https://www.kovair.com/intelligent-devops/

      Kovair

      OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

      Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

      What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?
      • Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
      • Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
      • Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
      • Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
      • Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
      • Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.
      What benefits should users look for in reviews?
      • Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
      • Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
      • Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
      • User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
      • Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

      In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

      OpenText
       

      Sample Customers

      Division of the State Architect (DSA), HSBC
      Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
      Buyer's Guide
      Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
      December 2025
      Download Free Report
      Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: December 2025.
      DOWNLOAD NOW
      881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
      See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

      We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.