No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Kubernetes Everywhere vs Spryker Systems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kubernetes Everywhere
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Managed Cloud Services (3rd)
Spryker Systems
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
eCommerce Platforms (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Kubernetes Everywhere and Spryker Systems aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Kubernetes Everywhere is designed for Managed Cloud Services and holds a mindshare of 6.5%, up 2.6% compared to last year.
Spryker Systems, on the other hand, focuses on eCommerce Platforms, holds 1.0% mindshare, up 0.9% since last year.
Managed Cloud Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kubernetes Everywhere6.5%
HPE GreenLake18.2%
Everpure Evergreen One17.0%
Other58.3%
Managed Cloud Services
eCommerce Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Spryker Systems1.0%
Adobe Commerce6.1%
SAP Commerce Cloud4.7%
Other88.2%
eCommerce Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2784369 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director, Mobile & Online Channel at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Reliable mobile platform has delivered accurate retirement data and reduces incident rates
The best feature Kubernetes Everywhere offers is the reliability feature, which mostly impresses me. What makes the reliability stand out for me is uptime and error handling; also, as I mentioned previously, it's providing reliable data, which is very important for us in TIAA because it is the retirement data that we serve, and we do not want to provide anything incorrect to our participants. As this is a 100-year-old company, we want to make sure our participants are given the accurate information, reliable information that they deserve. Kubernetes Everywhere has impacted my organization positively by being reliable as well as providing accurate data, maintaining the uptime, which is very important, and making sure we deliver the accurate data that is required by our participants. I have seen specific outcomes, with incidents having definitely reduced drastically from what it was a few years back; so certainly, I can see there is more than 25 to 50% reduction in the incidents since adopting Kubernetes Everywhere.
AP
Staff Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Headless architecture has powered high‑traffic APIs and accelerated complex commerce projects
For Spryker Systems, there is one major issue I see. There are no peer groups or developer channels where we can post our problems. If we go with Magento and other frameworks, there are many developers available there. You can search on Google, and there are multiple solutions available. You can see the solution, apply it, and then determine if you are able to solve your problem. This type of community resource is missing in Spryker Systems, so they need to do a lot of work on their side. Some user-friendly features are missing in Spryker Systems. Right now, in the present release, they did some things, but they need to do much more from a normal user's point of view. Currently, Spryker Systems is only focused on developer points of view, such as how a developer can extend the functionality or inject functionality into the system. However, if we talk about default features, there are no features. For example, there is nothing for reporting, and if we go with the configuration, only basic configuration is available. No high-level or low-level configuration exists. For example, if we want to showcase something on the cart checkout page, you cannot simply go into the configuration and enable or disable things. These types of features are missing. If Spryker Systems works on these parts, then it is a very cool platform from a user's standpoint.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Kubernetes Everywhere positively impacts our organization by making it quite easy to deploy different microservices for different languages; we simply build the Docker container and pass it to the YAML, and if anything breaks, debugging is straightforward because we know exactly where the issue is coming from."
"Since we started using Kubernetes Everywhere, we brought all the applications in one place, which impacted the speed, security, and cost, and mainly the data, so the data stays in one place."
"I have seen specific outcomes, with incidents having definitely reduced drastically from what it was a few years back; so certainly, I can see there is more than 25 to 50% reduction in the incidents since adopting Kubernetes Everywhere."
"Kubernetes Everywhere has impacted my organization positively because performance-wise, we don't have any downtimes, whereas earlier we used to have downtime."
"Kubernetes Everywhere is easy to operate when you have a settled environment and easy to manage, offering high availability and fault tolerance with all high availability features, rich support of the latest technologies, vulnerability management, and easy management."
"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization by providing lower costs, flexibility, and scalability."
"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing downtime; we have achieved almost zero minutes of downtime since implementing Kubernetes Everywhere in our organization after transitioning from manual deployments."
"Kubernetes Everywhere is a very good tool with most of the features taken from Kubernetes open-source, and it works really well, is highly scalable with very low latency."
"Spryker Systems is very useful as we can use it as a user interface and as an entire ERP or CRM system."
"If someone has a big product, then they can use Spryker Systems there, and if they do not want to lose customers' sessions or lose their customers, then Spryker Systems is a viable option."
"The platform's composability is valuable as it provides a variety of extensions to interface with other solutions."
"From an extensive point of view or for a large project point of view, Spryker Systems is the best platform right now."
"So far, as I could see, Spryker Systems is stable in my experience."
"Spryker Systems has had a positive impact on my company because we were able to generate a significant revenue increase in our e-commerce area."
"Over the last six months, I have found that Spryker Systems' composable commerce and integration capabilities have helped me because Spryker also has the capability with Docker."
 

Cons

"Customer support for Kubernetes Everywhere could be better."
"Kubernetes Everywhere can be improved by providing an easier way for users to handle commands and developing a UI-based approach to make it easier for developers and semi-technical users, as well as focusing on improving containerization."
"Kubernetes Everywhere is pretty good, but it can be improved in terms of reliability and speed because currently, it takes around two to three minutes to deploy my entire app, possibly due to the weight of the codes I have or some outages from the platform side."
"Deploying Kubernetes Everywhere infrastructure is somewhat difficult because there are many components that need to be deployed."
"Due to poor planning of the application developers and resource management, I have seen crashes, downtimes, and performance issues."
"Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, running a Kubernetes cluster can be costly depending on the use case; however, running on GCP GKE is cheaper compared to AWS, making it relatively economical in our case."
"Kubernetes Everywhere can be improved if it had more convenient commands, which would make it easier for me to remember all the commands in GCP for Kubernetes."
"At this time, I may not have any improvement suggestions; I want to explore more, so the features currently provided satisfy me, but if there is anything Kubernetes Everywhere can share with modernization, that would be great."
"Spryker Systems could be improved if we can reduce the complexity level."
"For Spryker Systems, there is one major issue I see. There are no peer groups or developer channels where we can post our problems."
"In my opinion, there are no best features on Spryker Systems. It is a very complex system that uses hexagonal architecture and is very complicated."
"When we build a Spryker Systems application in our local environment, it is really painful as it takes a long time, and the build requires a high-configuration system to become executable in our local environment."
"Spryker, even with its native features, often requires some development and configuration into the code, which is not straightforward in the beginning."
"Spryker Systems is a good company with good customer support. However, there are also problems and setbacks from time to time."
"In Spryker Systems, the main issue is that connectivity is too difficult. If I want to make a small change, I have to pass code through three layers: Zed, Yves, and middleware."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Cloud Services solutions are best for your needs.
908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
27%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Construction Company
27%
Insurance Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kubernetes Everywhere?
The static cost for the control plane is $75, which is not a significant issue for a large organization considering we can host multiple applications, and the cost for the nodes remains the same as...
What needs improvement with Kubernetes Everywhere?
Kubernetes Everywhere can be improved by providing an easier way for users to handle commands and developing a UI-based approach to make it easier for developers and semi-technical users, as well a...
What is your primary use case for Kubernetes Everywhere?
I have been using Kubernetes Everywhere in production and UAT for almost a year, and I have also implemented it in some of my projects for freelancing. I am using Kubernetes Everywhere for the capa...
What needs improvement with Spryker Systems?
Spryker Systems can improve with their setup functionalities, as it is totally based on the Symfony framework and vendor libraries. When we build a Spryker Systems application in our local environm...
What is your primary use case for Spryker Systems?
Spryker Systems is our primary e-commerce platform, and we have developed multiple applications including subscription portals, leasing portals, and billing and checkout functionalities using Spryk...
What advice do you have for others considering Spryker Systems?
I advise them that if they are planning to get Spryker Systems in their local environment or in their day-to-day practice, they need to use high-configuration systems and have a good technical envi...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Spryker Cloud Commerce OS
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CDW, Everpure (formerly Pure Storage), Continent 8 and others in Managed Cloud Services. Updated: August 2026.
908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.