HPE GreenLake vs Kubernetes Everywhere comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Continent 8 are both solutions in the Managed Cloud Services category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.5, while Continent 8 is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.1. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 19.7% mindshare in MCS, compared to Continent 8’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Continent 8 users who would recommend it.

HPE GreenLake

Read 14 HPE GreenLake reviews

4,499 Views
1,485 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Kubernetes Everywhere

Read 12 Kubernetes Everywhere reviews

1,652 Views
330 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE GreenLake

Kubernetes Everywhere

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE GreenLake and Kubernetes Everywhere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Managed Cloud Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE GreenLake vs. Kubernetes Everywhere Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake vs. Kubernetes Everywhere

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE GreenLake

Ranking in Managed Cloud Services

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Consumption Services (2nd)

Kubernetes Everywhere

Ranking in Managed Cloud Services

2nd

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Managed Cloud Services category, the mindshare of HPE GreenLake is 19.7%, down from 35.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kubernetes Everywhere is 6.6%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Cloud Services Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kubernetes Everywhere	6.6%
HPE GreenLake	19.7%
Other	73.7%

Managed Cloud Services

Featured Reviews

Heriberto Mendez Olivo

CEO at Cyber Internet Services (Pvt) Ltd.

Flexible monthly infrastructure has simplified management and improved client cost control

Some valuable points about HPE GreenLake are that it is a managed solution in the same pane of glass. HPE GreenLake integrates well with the existing infrastructure, and it is straightforward. HPE GreenLake positively impacts my organization because it saves money and time, and it improves my sales because I have another solution to reduce costs for the client. The client may need to pay two thousand dollars to change every infrastructure in one payment, but not all clients have the total amount available. However, if it is possible to pay month-to-month for the solution, it is much easier for the client to accept the proposal. HPE GreenLake's real-time monitoring tools are good, and I really need them to improve the services.

Read full review

Manoday Ahire

AWS Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Reg-X Innovations

Modern deployment practices have reduced downtime and support efficient multi-app management

Kubernetes Everywhere offers features including auto-scaling, which is the best feature, as well as load balancing, ingress controllers, and the ability to host multiple applications on a single Kubernetes Everywhere cluster through segregation using namespaces. The commands are straightforward to execute, and it allows the integration and management of Docker containers efficiently. Auto-scaling is one of the features I use in Kubernetes Everywhere that made a significant impact, helping us with user distribution as the pods scale automatically without disruption as users increase, contributing to high availability and low downtime. I am using Kubernetes Everywhere with the GitOps approach, using Git as a source of truth, which provides excellent security and has made a significant change in our current infrastructure. Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing downtime. We have achieved almost zero minutes of downtime since implementing Kubernetes Everywhere in our organization after transitioning from manual deployments. Regarding cost savings, we were using multiple EC2 instances for different projects, but now everything is under one cluster, running as a pod and segregated by namespaces, leading to cost savings. For team collaboration, we are using different tools with Git as a source of truth, making it easy for developers to manage instances and gain insights efficiently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest thing that it gives us is reportability; that's the critical component. By giving us a monthly bill that is expandable based on usage, we're able to report back to the organization on the value that we're actually getting out of the hardware platform."

"We have seen ROI, reducing our organization's capacity management efforts by around 40 to 50 percent and saving our organization 30 to 40 percent while decreasing the time it takes to deploy IT projects by 50 percent."

"HPE has delivered on all their promises for this service."

"HPE GreenLake is highly stable."

"It is the flexible way to pay for everything that you need and pay as you go."

"In case the client needs this resource, it is available, and it is the best option in the market right now."

"It has helped us with the planning, and in concert with this, we are doing a lot of virtualizations. For a lot of cases, we are bringing in less gear and equipment to be able to accomplish the same things. It makes better use of what we do bring in."

"My clients are receiving a return on investment, this is why they are using it."

More HPE GreenLake pros

"I have seen specific outcomes, with incidents having definitely reduced drastically from what it was a few years back; so certainly, I can see there is more than 25 to 50% reduction in the incidents since adopting Kubernetes Everywhere."

"Since we started using Kubernetes Everywhere, we brought all the applications in one place, which impacted the speed, security, and cost, and mainly the data, so the data stays in one place."

"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing downtime; we have achieved almost zero minutes of downtime since implementing Kubernetes Everywhere in our organization after transitioning from manual deployments."

"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing the time needed to manage clusters and workloads, as we previously required several team members for cluster management, but now it provides a central console to manage everything."

"Kubernetes Everywhere is a very good tool with most of the features taken from Kubernetes open-source, and it works really well, is highly scalable with very low latency."

"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization by providing lower costs, flexibility, and scalability."

"Kubernetes Everywhere has positively impacted my organization with cost savings, where we have a good amount of savings around sixty thousand to seventy thousand USD per year."

"Kubernetes Everywhere positively impacts our organization by making it quite easy to deploy different microservices for different languages; we simply build the Docker container and pass it to the YAML, and if anything breaks, debugging is straightforward because we know exactly where the issue is coming from."

More Kubernetes Everywhere pros

Cons

"Because VMware is very expensive right now, offering another solution for a hypervisor from HP at a much lower cost of six hundred dollars a year is really awesome."

"I think the solution has cost us money. It hasn't decreased the time it takes to deploy IT projects."

"Unfortunately, HPE GreenLake can be sold only in Bahrain, UAE, and the Middle East, meaning it can be sold in only three or four countries because it requires certain approvals from countries where it has to be used."

"There could be better monitoring of growth and threshold usage so users could be more aware when their billing will change."

"I would really like to see more granularity in the costing model. That's the one limitation that we do have: We have a lot of departments. We want to be able to break down, in a granular way, that this department is using X amount of resources, that department is using Y amount of resources... I want to be able to tag it and say, "This is this department's fees, this is that department's fees." That way I could charge back internally to my own departments."

"I am still struggling with monitoring, particularly with OpsRamp, which is not fully customized to our needs, especially for disaster recovery."

"The interconnects were a challenge originally, but they sorted that out, and It was fine. We did have to spend a bit more money."

"There is a need for improved support in HPE GreenLake, including more administrators and engineers to provide faster resolution for issues."

More HPE GreenLake cons

"At this time, I may not have any improvement suggestions; I want to explore more, so the features currently provided satisfy me, but if there is anything Kubernetes Everywhere can share with modernization, that would be great."

"Kubernetes Everywhere is pretty good, but it can be improved in terms of reliability and speed because currently, it takes around two to three minutes to deploy my entire app, possibly due to the weight of the codes I have or some outages from the platform side."

"Kubernetes Everywhere can be improved if it had more convenient commands, which would make it easier for me to remember all the commands in GCP for Kubernetes."

"Deploying Kubernetes Everywhere infrastructure is somewhat difficult because there are many components that need to be deployed."

"Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, running a Kubernetes cluster can be costly depending on the use case; however, running on GCP GKE is cheaper compared to AWS, making it relatively economical in our case."

"Customer support for Kubernetes Everywhere could be better."

"Kubernetes Everywhere can be improved by providing an easier way for users to handle commands and developing a UI-based approach to make it easier for developers and semi-technical users, as well as focusing on improving containerization."

"Due to poor planning of the application developers and resource management, I have seen crashes, downtimes, and performance issues."

More Kubernetes Everywhere cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, it's a bit on the higher side."

"HPE GreenLake payment model is you pay for what you use. You can purchase a yearly, quarterly, or half-year license. The overall price of the solution is a little high and hopeful there can be better margins in the future."

"If you're used to buying HPE servers, it's less expensive than that. I don't really compare competitor servers because HPE has never given me any reason to look otherwise. However, if you get good pricing on HPE servers, you get better pricing on GreenLake."

"The price could be more flexible."

"It's a small cost per month compared to that one-time purchase. The big thing is if you get your one-time purchase wrong, then you are buying a lot more. With GreenLake, if we miss estimate (which with all the planning, you usually don't), we sign a piece of paper, and then they send more equipment in."

"HPE GreenLake has been growing in popularity due to its subscription model. The flexibility of the solution allows it to adapt to the changing market trends towards more edge performance and workloads."

"If you are looking to turn some of your capital expense into operational expense, this allows you to do it. It is a good idea."

"Right now we're paying about $180,000 per year."

More HPE GreenLake pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Cloud Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Construction Company

28%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE GreenLake?

We had a service and cost model established on utilization for specific KPIs, and we were measured by memory and storage, with no costs for CPU consumption.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE GreenLake?

HPE GreenLake solution is very good. Another solution that really improves the offering is what HP created for its own hypervisor solution. Because VMware is very expensive right now, offering anot...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE GreenLake?

I have dealt with HPE GreenLake for approximately one year. Initially, I offered service only, but this year, I am using it to sell HP products because the supplier in Puerto Rico, Solution Box, he...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kubernetes Everywhere?

The static cost for the control plane is $75, which is not a significant issue for a large organization considering we can host multiple applications, and the cost for the nodes remains the same as...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kubernetes Everywhere?

Kubernetes Everywhere can be improved by providing an easier way for users to handle commands and developing a UI-based approach to make it easier for developers and semi-technical users, as well a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kubernetes Everywhere?

I have been using Kubernetes Everywhere in production and UAT for almost a year, and I have also implemented it in some of my projects for freelancing. I am using Kubernetes Everywhere for the capa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell APEX vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 54% of the time

Everpure Evergreen One vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 22% of the time

CDW Managed Cloud Services vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Open Pay vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 4% of the time

Everpure Storage Evergreen Flex vs HPE GreenLake

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE GreenLake Competitors

HashiCorp Cloud Platform (HCP) vs Kubernetes Everywhere

Compared 23% of the time

n8n vs Kubernetes Everywhere

Compared 17% of the time

Everpure Evergreen One vs Kubernetes Everywhere

Compared 11% of the time

Spryker Systems vs Kubernetes Everywhere

Compared 8% of the time

CloudCheckr vs Kubernetes Everywhere

Compared 7% of the time

More Kubernetes Everywhere Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake

June 2026

Download HPE GreenLake product report

Buyer's Guide

Kubernetes Everywhere

June 2026

Download Kubernetes Everywhere product report

Also Known As

GreenLake Flex Capacity, HPE Flexible Capacity, HPE FlexCap

No data available

Overview

HPE GreenLake offers cost efficiency, consistent spending, and flexibility in scaling, providing a cloud-like experience with on-premises performance. It integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, supporting a hybrid cloud approach with ease.

HPE GreenLake is renowned for its cost-effectiveness and flexible scaling, blending cloud and on-premises experiences. It integrates efficiently with current systems and simplifies storage expansion and backup management through a GUI. Users leverage its hybrid cloud support, embracing a monthly OPEX model for efficient management with real-time monitoring, payment options, and security measures, addressing core demands in both compute and storage environments.

What are the key features of HPE GreenLake?

Cost Efficiency: Offers predictable financial management through constant spending.
Scalability: Provides flexibility in scaling resources according to demand.
Hybrid Cloud Strategy: Supports integration across cloud and on-premises infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Facilitates reduced management workload through active monitoring.
OPEX Model: Encourages an operational expense approach for easier budgeting.

What benefits can businesses expect from HPE GreenLake?

Financial Predictability: Ensures consistent spending to manage budgets efficiently.
Resource Flexibility: Allows organizations to scale operations smoothly as needed.
Infrastructure Ease: Provides straightforward integration with existing systems.
Enhanced Security: Delivers robust security features for safe operations.

HPE GreenLake finds implementation success across various industries involving compute, storage, and backup management. Organizations leveraging Epic, Citrix, and HyperSpace environments benefit from its cloud integration capabilities, simplifying complex environments and automating pipelines while maintaining support for virtualization platforms like VMware or Hyper-V.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Kubernetes Everywhere simplifies the deployment and management of applications across multicloud environments, offering a unified approach to container orchestration. It facilitates efficient integration and adaptability, enhancing operational continuity for enterprises.

Kubernetes Everywhere provides a comprehensive platform that supports application scaling, load balancing, and automated updates, ensuring seamless operations across cloud ecosystems. Designed for modern cloud infrastructure, it empowers enterprises to optimize resources, reduce downtime, and enhance application lifecycle management. Its robust architecture and support for diverse workloads make it a key choice for firms seeking agile and scalable solutions.

What are the key features of Kubernetes Everywhere?

Multicloud Support: Seamlessly manage workloads across different cloud platforms.
Automated Updates: Ensure applications are always running the latest versions with minimal manual intervention.
Scalability: Effortlessly scale applications to meet demand without compromising performance.
Load Balancing: Automatically distribute network traffic to maintain system stability and efficiency.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Savings: Optimize resource usage, leading to reduced operational costs.
Increased Uptime: Minimize downtime with reliable and consistent performance.
Flexibility: Easily adapt to changing business needs with scalable infrastructure.
Enhanced Efficiency: Streamline management processes to improve productivity.

Kubernetes Everywhere is employed across industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, where reliable multicloud operations and robust scaling capabilities are crucial. Its implementation supports critical applications by ensuring high availability and rapid adaptability, making it a preferred choice for enterprises.

Continent 8

Sample Customers

Capgemini Finland Infrastructure Services, Sogeti BeLux, Accenture

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HPE GreenLake vs. Kubernetes Everywhere

April 2026

Free Report: HPE GreenLake vs. Kubernetes Everywhere

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE GreenLake vs. Kubernetes Everywhere and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE GreenLake vs. Kubernetes Everywhere report.

See our list of best Managed Cloud Services vendors.

We monitor all Managed Cloud Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.